IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0029104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partner-Aware Prediction of Interacting Residues in Protein-Protein Complexes from Sequence Data

Author

Listed:
  • Shandar Ahmad
  • Kenji Mizuguchi

Abstract

Computational prediction of residues that participate in protein-protein interactions is a difficult task, and state of the art methods have shown only limited success in this arena. One possible problem with these methods is that they try to predict interacting residues without incorporating information about the partner protein, although it is unclear how much partner information could enhance prediction performance. To address this issue, the two following comparisons are of crucial significance: (a) comparison between the predictability of inter-protein residue pairs, i.e., predicting exactly which residue pairs interact with each other given two protein sequences; this can be achieved by either combining conventional single-protein predictions or making predictions using a new model trained directly on the residue pairs, and the performance of these two approaches may be compared: (b) comparison between the predictability of the interacting residues in a single protein (irrespective of the partner residue or protein) from conventional methods and predictions converted from the pair-wise trained model. Using these two streams of training and validation procedures and employing similar two-stage neural networks, we showed that the models trained on pair-wise contacts outperformed the partner-unaware models in predicting both interacting pairs and interacting single-protein residues. Prediction performance decreased with the size of the conformational change upon complex formation; this trend is similar to docking, even though no structural information was used in our prediction. An example application that predicts two partner-specific interfaces of a protein was shown to be effective, highlighting the potential of the proposed approach. Finally, a preliminary attempt was made to score docking decoy poses using prediction of interacting residue pairs; this analysis produced an encouraging result.

Suggested Citation

  • Shandar Ahmad & Kenji Mizuguchi, 2011. "Partner-Aware Prediction of Interacting Residues in Protein-Protein Complexes from Sequence Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0029104
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029104&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0029104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Domonkos Tikk & Philippe Thomas & Peter Palaga & Jörg Hakenberg & Ulf Leser, 2010. "A Comprehensive Benchmark of Kernel Methods to Extract Protein–Protein Interactions from Literature," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanchan Jha & Sriparna Saha & Pratik Dutta, 2024. "Incorporation of gene ontology in identification of protein interactions from biomedical corpus: a multi-modal approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1793-1811, August.
    2. Peng Su & Gang Li & Cathy Wu & K Vijay-Shanker, 2019. "Using distant supervision to augment manually annotated data for relation extraction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Kersten Döring & Ammar Qaseem & Michael Becer & Jianyu Li & Pankaj Mishra & Mingjie Gao & Pascal Kirchner & Florian Sauter & Kiran K Telukunta & Aurélien F A Moumbock & Philippe Thomas & Stefan Günthe, 2020. "Automated recognition of functional compound-protein relationships in literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Behrouz Bokharaeian & Alberto Diaz & Hamidreza Chitsaz, 2016. "Enhancing Extraction of Drug-Drug Interaction from Literature Using Neutral Candidates, Negation, and Clause Dependency," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Haibin Liu & Lawrence Hunter & Vlado Kešelj & Karin Verspoor, 2013. "Approximate Subgraph Matching-Based Literature Mining for Biomedical Events and Relations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0029104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.