IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0022871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Methods in Recent HIV Noninferiority Trials: Reanalysis of 11 Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Flandre

Abstract

Background: In recent years the “noninferiority” trial has emerged as the new standard design for HIV drug development among antiretroviral patients often with a primary endpoint based on the difference in success rates between the two treatment groups. Different statistical methods have been introduced to provide confidence intervals for that difference. The main objective is to investigate whether the choice of the statistical method changes the conclusion of the trials. Methods: We presented 11 trials published in 2010 using a difference in proportions as the primary endpoint. In these trials, 5 different statistical methods have been used to estimate such confidence intervals. The five methods are described and applied to data from the 11 trials. The noninferiority of the new treatment is not demonstrated if the prespecified noninferiority margin it includes in the confidence interval of the treatment difference. Results: Results indicated that confidence intervals can be quite different according to the method used. In many situations, however, conclusions of the trials are not altered because point estimates of the treatment difference were too far from the prespecified noninferiority margins. Nevertheless, in few trials the use of different statistical methods led to different conclusions. In particular the use of “exact” methods can be very confusing. Conclusion: Statistical methods used to estimate confidence intervals in noninferiority trials have a strong impact on the conclusion of such trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Flandre, 2011. "Statistical Methods in Recent HIV Noninferiority Trials: Reanalysis of 11 Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-8, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0022871
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0022871
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0022871&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0022871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barker L. & Rolka H. & Rolka D. & Brown C., 2001. "Equivalence Testing for Binomial Random Variables: Which Test to Use?," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 55, pages 279-287, November.
    2. Alan Agresti & Yongyi Min, 2001. "On Small-Sample Confidence Intervals for Parameters in Discrete Distributions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 963-971, September.
    3. Ivan S. F. Chan & Zhongxin Zhang, 1999. "Test-Based Exact Confidence Intervals for the Difference of Two Binomial Proportions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 1202-1209, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Man-Lai & Qiu, Shi-Fang & Poon, Wai-Yin, 2012. "Confidence interval construction for disease prevalence based on partial validation series," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1200-1220.
    2. Dongyuan Wu & Guogen Shan, 2024. "Score confidence interval with continuity correction for ratio of two independent proportions," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 82(2), pages 183-199, August.
    3. Alan Agresti & Sabrina Giordano & Anna Gottard, 2022. "A Review of Score-Test-Based Inference for Categorical Data," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 20(1), pages 31-48, September.
    4. Martin Andres, A. & Herranz Tejedor, I., 2004. "Exact unconditional non-classical tests on the difference of two proportions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 373-388, March.
    5. Santner, Thomas J. & Pradhan, Vivek & Senchaudhuri, Pralay & Mehta, Cyrus R. & Tamhane, Ajit, 2007. "Small-sample comparisons of confidence intervals for the difference of two independent binomial proportions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 5791-5799, August.
    6. Kabaila, Paul, 2008. "Statistical properties of exact confidence intervals from discrete data using studentized test statistics," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(6), pages 720-727, April.
    7. Reiczigel, Jeno & Abonyi-Tóth, Zsolt & Singer, Júlia, 2008. "An exact confidence set for two binomial proportions and exact unconditional confidence intervals for the difference and ratio of proportions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(11), pages 5046-5053, July.
    8. Munk, A. & Skipka, G. & Stratmann, B., 2005. "Testing general hypotheses under binomial sampling: the two sample case--asymptotic theory and exact procedures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 723-739, June.
    9. Joseph B. Lang, 2017. "Mean-Minimum Exact Confidence Intervals," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(4), pages 354-368, October.
    10. Devan V. Mehrotra & Ivan S. F. Chan & Roger L. Berger, 2003. "A Cautionary Note on Exact Unconditional Inference for a Difference between Two Independent Binomial Proportions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 441-450, June.
    11. Schaarschmidt, Frank & Gerhard, Daniel & Vogel, Charlotte, 2017. "Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparisons of several multinomial samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 65-76.
    12. Agresti, Alan & Gottard, Anna, 2007. "Nonconservative exact small-sample inference for discrete data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6447-6458, August.
    13. Martin Biehler & Heinz Holling & Philipp Doebler, 2015. "Saddlepoint Approximations of the Distribution of the Person Parameter in the Two Parameter Logistic Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 665-688, September.
    14. Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Sébastien Duchêne & Eric Guerci, 2016. "Quantum-like models cannot account for the conjunction fallacy," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 479-510, November.
    15. Nian-Sheng Tang & Man-Lai Tang, 2002. "Exact Unconditional Inference for Risk Ratio in a Correlated 2 × 2 Table with Structural Zero," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 972-980, December.
    16. Nicholas Taylor, 2010. "The Determinants of Future U.S. Monetary Policy: High‐Frequency Evidence," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(2‐3), pages 399-420, March.
    17. Barry Kronenfeld & Timothy Leslie, 2015. "Restricted random labeling: testing for between-group interaction after controlling for joint population and within-group spatial structure," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28, January.
    18. Rickey E. Carter & Yan Lin & Stuart R. Lipsitz & Robert G. Newcombe & Kathie L. Hermayer, 2010. "Relative risk estimated from the ratio of two median unbiased estimates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(4), pages 657-671, August.
    19. Xu Gao & Daniel Gillen & Hernando Ombao, 2018. "Fisher information matrix of binary time series," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 76(3), pages 287-304, December.
    20. Shu-Chih Su & Xiaoming Li & Yanli Zhao & Ivan S. F. Chan, 2018. "Population-Enrichment Adaptive Design Strategy for an Event-Driven Vaccine Efficacy Trial," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 10(2), pages 357-370, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0022871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.