IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0010304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FAM-MDR: A Flexible Family-Based Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction Technique to Detect Epistasis Using Related Individuals

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Cattaert
  • Víctor Urrea
  • Adam C Naj
  • Lizzy De Lobel
  • Vanessa De Wit
  • Mao Fu
  • Jestinah M Mahachie John
  • Haiqing Shen
  • M Luz Calle
  • Marylyn D Ritchie
  • Todd L Edwards
  • Kristel Van Steen

Abstract

We propose a novel multifactor dimensionality reduction method for epistasis detection in small or extended pedigrees, FAM-MDR. It combines features of the Genome-wide Rapid Association using Mixed Model And Regression approach (GRAMMAR) with Model-Based MDR (MB-MDR). We focus on continuous traits, although the method is general and can be used for outcomes of any type, including binary and censored traits. When comparing FAM-MDR with Pedigree-based Generalized MDR (PGMDR), which is a generalization of Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (MDR) to continuous traits and related individuals, FAM-MDR was found to outperform PGMDR in terms of power, in most of the considered simulated scenarios. Additional simulations revealed that PGMDR does not appropriately deal with multiple testing and consequently gives rise to overly optimistic results. FAM-MDR adequately deals with multiple testing in epistasis screens and is in contrast rather conservative, by construction. Furthermore, simulations show that correcting for lower order (main) effects is of utmost importance when claiming epistasis. As Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a complex phenotype likely influenced by gene-gene interactions, we applied FAM-MDR to examine data on glucose area-under-the-curve (GAUC), an endophenotype of T2DM for which multiple independent genetic associations have been observed, in the Amish Family Diabetes Study (AFDS). This application reveals that FAM-MDR makes more efficient use of the available data than PGMDR and can deal with multi-generational pedigrees more easily. In conclusion, we have validated FAM-MDR and compared it to PGMDR, the current state-of-the-art MDR method for family data, using both simulations and a practical dataset. FAM-MDR is found to outperform PGMDR in that it handles the multiple testing issue more correctly, has increased power, and efficiently uses all available information.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Cattaert & Víctor Urrea & Adam C Naj & Lizzy De Lobel & Vanessa De Wit & Mao Fu & Jestinah M Mahachie John & Haiqing Shen & M Luz Calle & Marylyn D Ritchie & Todd L Edwards & Kristel Van Steen, 2010. "FAM-MDR: A Flexible Family-Based Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction Technique to Detect Epistasis Using Related Individuals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0010304
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0010304
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0010304&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0010304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Najaf Amin & Cornelia M van Duijn & Yurii S Aulchenko, 2007. "A Genomic Background Based Method for Association Analysis in Related Individuals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(12), pages 1-7, December.
    2. B. Devlin & Kathryn Roeder, 1999. "Genomic Control for Association Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 997-1004, December.
    3. Casey S Greene & Nadia M Penrod & Scott M Williams & Jason H Moore, 2009. "Failure to Replicate a Genetic Association May Provide Important Clues About Genetic Architecture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-7, June.
    4. Dan Nettleton & R. W. Doerge, 2000. "Accounting for Variability in the Use of Permutation Testing to Detect Quantitative Trait Loci," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 52-58, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo-Bo Chen & Yi Xu & Hai-Ming Xu & Ming D Li & Jun Zhu & Xiang-Yang Lou, 2011. "Practical and Theoretical Considerations in Study Design for Detecting Gene-Gene Interactions Using MDR and GMDR Approaches," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-9, February.
    2. Jestinah M Mahachie John & Tom Cattaert & François Van Lishout & Elena S Gusareva & Kristel Van Steen, 2012. "Lower-Order Effects Adjustment in Quantitative Traits Model-Based Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jakris Eu-ahsunthornwattana & E Nancy Miller & Michaela Fakiola & Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2 & Selma M B Jeronimo & Jenefer M Blackwell & Heather J Cordell, 2014. "Comparison of Methods to Account for Relatedness in Genome-Wide Association Studies with Family-Based Data," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Lei Zhang & Yu-Fang Pei & Jian Li & Christopher J Papasian & Hong-Wen Deng, 2009. "Univariate/Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Scans Using Data from Families and Unrelated Samples," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Dominic Holland & Oleksandr Frei & Rahul Desikan & Chun-Chieh Fan & Alexey A Shadrin & Olav B Smeland & V S Sundar & Paul Thompson & Ole A Andreassen & Anders M Dale, 2020. "Beyond SNP heritability: Polygenicity and discoverability of phenotypes estimated with a univariate Gaussian mixture model," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, May.
    4. Vincent Michaud & Eulalie Lasseaux & David J. Green & Dave T. Gerrard & Claudio Plaisant & Tomas Fitzgerald & Ewan Birney & Benoît Arveiler & Graeme C. Black & Panagiotis I. Sergouniotis, 2022. "The contribution of common regulatory and protein-coding TYR variants to the genetic architecture of albinism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Natalie DeForest & Yuqi Wang & Zhiyi Zhu & Jacqueline S. Dron & Ryan Koesterer & Pradeep Natarajan & Jason Flannick & Tiffany Amariuta & Gina M. Peloso & Amit R. Majithia, 2024. "Genome-wide discovery and integrative genomic characterization of insulin resistance loci using serum triglycerides to HDL-cholesterol ratio as a proxy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Parsa Akbari & Dragana Vuckovic & Luca Stefanucci & Tao Jiang & Kousik Kundu & Roman Kreuzhuber & Erik L. Bao & Janine H. Collins & Kate Downes & Luigi Grassi & Jose A. Guerrero & Stephen Kaptoge & Ju, 2023. "A genome-wide association study of blood cell morphology identifies cellular proteins implicated in disease aetiology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. B. Moerkerke & E. Goetghebeur & J. De Riek & I. Roldán‐Ruiz, 2006. "Significance and impotence: towards a balanced view of the null and the alternative hypotheses in marker selection for plant breeding," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(1), pages 61-79, January.
    8. Gang Zheng & Zhaohai Li & Mitchell H. Gail & Joseph L. Gastwirth, 2010. "Impact of Population Substructure on Trend Tests for Genetic Case–Control Association Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 196-204, March.
    9. Sandosh Padmanabhan & Olle Melander & Toby Johnson & Anna Maria Di Blasio & Wai K Lee & Davide Gentilini & Claire E Hastie & Cristina Menni & Maria Cristina Monti & Christian Delles & Stewart Laing & , 2010. "Genome-Wide Association Study of Blood Pressure Extremes Identifies Variant near UMOD Associated with Hypertension," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-11, October.
    10. Jianzhong Ma & Christopher I Amos, 2010. "Theoretical Formulation of Principal Components Analysis to Detect and Correct for Population Stratification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-14, September.
    11. Claire L Simpson & Robert Wojciechowski & Konrad Oexle & Federico Murgia & Laura Portas & Xiaohui Li & Virginie J M Verhoeven & Veronique Vitart & Maria Schache & S Mohsen Hosseini & Pirro G Hysi & Le, 2014. "Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis of Myopia and Hyperopia Provides Evidence for Replication of 11 Loci," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Cyril S Rakovski & Daniel O Stram, 2009. "A Kinship-Based Modification of the Armitage Trend Test to Address Hidden Population Structure and Small Differential Genotyping Errors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-10, June.
    13. Denise Anderson & Heather J Cordell & Michaela Fakiola & Richard W Francis & Genevieve Syn & Elizabeth S H Scaman & Elizabeth Davis & Simon J Miles & Toby McLeay & Sarra E Jamieson & Jenefer M Blackwe, 2015. "First Genome-Wide Association Study in an Australian Aboriginal Population Provides Insights into Genetic Risk Factors for Body Mass Index and Type 2 Diabetes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Matthieu Bouaziz & Christophe Ambroise & Mickael Guedj, 2011. "Accounting for Population Stratification in Practice: A Comparison of the Main Strategies Dedicated to Genome-Wide Association Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Aditi Shendre & Howard W Wiener & Marguerite R Irvin & Bradley E Aouizerat & Edgar T Overton & Jason Lazar & Chenglong Liu & Howard N Hodis & Nita A Limdi & Kathleen M Weber & Stephen J Gange & Degui , 2017. "Genome-wide admixture and association study of subclinical atherosclerosis in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Li Shaoyu & Lu Qing & Fu Wenjiang & Romero Roberto & Cui Yuehua, 2009. "A Regularized Regression Approach for Dissecting Genetic Conflicts that Increase Disease Risk in Pregnancy," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30, October.
    17. Warrington Nicole M. & Tilling Kate & Howe Laura D. & Paternoster Lavinia & Pennell Craig E. & Wu Yan Yan & Briollais Laurent, 2014. "Robustness of the linear mixed effects model to error distribution assumptions and the consequences for genome-wide association studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(5), pages 567-587, October.
    18. Wang, Linglu & Li, Qizhai & Li, Zhaohai & Zheng, Gang, 2011. "Bayes factors in the presence of population stratification," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(7), pages 836-841, July.
    19. Boitard Simon & Mangin Brigitte & Azaïs Jean-Marc, 2010. "Asymptotic Distribution of the "Orthogonal" Quantitative Transmission Disequilibrium Test in a Structured Population: Exact Formula," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Ilja M Nolte & Chris Wallace & Stephen J Newhouse & Daryl Waggott & Jingyuan Fu & Nicole Soranzo & Rhian Gwilliam & Panos Deloukas & Irina Savelieva & Dongling Zheng & Chrysoula Dalageorgou & Martin F, 2009. "Common Genetic Variation Near the Phospholamban Gene Is Associated with Cardiac Repolarisation: Meta-Analysis of Three Genome-Wide Association Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-10, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0010304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.