IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0008447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Vivo Dynamical Interactions between CD4 Tregs, CD8 Tregs and CD4+CD25− Cells in Mice

Author

Listed:
  • Arnon Arazi
  • Amir Sharabi
  • Heidy Zinger
  • Edna Mozes
  • Avidan U Neumann

Abstract

Background: Regulatory T cells (Tregs) were shown to be central in maintaining immunological homeostasis and preventing the development of autoimmune diseases. Several subsets of Tregs have been identified to date; however, the dynamics of the interactions between these subsets, and their implications on their regulatory functions are yet to be elucidated. Methodology/Principal Findings: We employed a combination of mathematical modeling and frequent in vivo measurements of several T cell subsets. Healthy BALB/c mice received a single injection of either hCDR1 - a tolerogenic peptide previously shown to induce Tregs, a control peptide or vehicle alone, and were monitored for 16 days. During this period, splenocytes from the treated mice were analyzed for the levels of CD4, CD25, CD8, CD28 and Foxp3. The collected data were then fitted to mathematical models, in order to test competing hypotheses regarding the interactions between the followed T cell subsets. In all 3 treatment groups, a significant, lasting, non-random perturbation of the immune system could be observed. Our analysis predicted the emergence of functional CD4 Tregs based on inverse oscillations of the latter and CD4+CD25− cells. Furthermore, CD4 Tregs seemed to require a sufficiently high level of CD8 Tregs in order to become functional, while conversion was unlikely to be their major source. Our results indicated in addition that Foxp3 is not a sufficient marker for regulatory activity. Conclusions/Significance: In this work, we unraveled the dynamics of the interplay between CD4, CD8 Tregs and effector T cells, using, for the first time, a mathematical-mechanistic perspective in the analysis of Treg kinetics. Furthermore, the results obtained from this interdisciplinary approach supported the notion that CD4 Tregs need to interact with CD8 Tregs in order to become functional. Finally, we generated predictions regarding the time-dependent function of Tregs, which can be further tested empirically in future work.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnon Arazi & Amir Sharabi & Heidy Zinger & Edna Mozes & Avidan U Neumann, 2009. "In Vivo Dynamical Interactions between CD4 Tregs, CD8 Tregs and CD4+CD25− Cells in Mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0008447
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008447
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008447&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0008447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David D. Ho & Avidan U. Neumann & Alan S. Perelson & Wen Chen & John M. Leonard & Martin Markowitz, 1995. "Rapid Turnover of Plasma Virions and CD4 Lymphocytes in HIV-1 Infection," Working Papers 95-01-002, Santa Fe Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iraj Hosseini & Feilim Mac Gabhann, 2012. "Multi-Scale Modeling of HIV Infection in vitro and APOBEC3G-Based Anti-Retroviral Therapy," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Hillmann, Andreas & Crane, Martin & Ruskin, Heather J., 2017. "HIV models for treatment interruption: Adaptation and comparison," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 483(C), pages 44-56.
    3. Gumel, A.B. & Twizell, E.H. & Yu, P., 2000. "Numerical and bifurcation analyses for a population model of HIV chemotherapy," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 169-181.
    4. Dacheng Liu & Tao Lu & Xu-Feng Niu & Hulin Wu, 2011. "Mixed-Effects State-Space Models for Analysis of Longitudinal Dynamic Systems," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 476-485, June.
    5. Wang, Jinliang & Guo, Min & Liu, Xianning & Zhao, Zhitao, 2016. "Threshold dynamics of HIV-1 virus model with cell-to-cell transmission, cell-mediated immune responses and distributed delay," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 291(C), pages 149-161.
    6. Nicolas Rapin & Ole Lund & Massimo Bernaschi & Filippo Castiglione, 2010. "Computational Immunology Meets Bioinformatics: The Use of Prediction Tools for Molecular Binding in the Simulation of the Immune System," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Cong Han & Kathryn Chaloner, 2004. "Bayesian Experimental Design for Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models with Application to HIV Dynamics," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 25-33, March.
    8. Singh, Harendra, 2021. "Analysis of drug treatment of the fractional HIV infection model of CD4+ T-cells," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. James B Gilmore & Anthony D Kelleher & David A Cooper & John M Murray, 2013. "Explaining the Determinants of First Phase HIV Decay Dynamics through the Effects of Stage-dependent Drug Action," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    10. Jianwei Chen, 2010. "Modelling long‐term human immunodeficiency virus dynamic models with application to acquired immune deficiency syndrome clinical study," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(5), pages 805-820, November.
    11. J. Guedj & R. Thiébaut & D. Commenges, 2007. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Dynamical Models of HIV," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1198-1206, December.
    12. Cai, Liming & Li, Xuezhi, 2009. "Stability and Hopf bifurcation in a delayed model for HIV infection of CD4+T cells," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-11.
    13. Bassey E & SU Ufoaroh, 2017. "On Discretization Method for Optimization Control Model for The Treatment of Pathogenic Induced HIV Infection," Current Trends in Clinical & Medical Imaging, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(5), pages 78-83, April.
    14. Rob J De Boer, 2012. "Which of Our Modeling Predictions Are Robust?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-5, July.
    15. Rebecca M. D'Amato & Richard T. D'Aquila & Lawrence M. Wein, 2000. "Management of Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Infection: Analyzing When to Change Therapy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1200-1213, September.
    16. Wein, Lawrence M. & D'Amato, Rebecca M. & Perelman, Alan S., 1947-, 1997. "Mathematical considerations of antiretroviral therapy aimed at HIV-1 eradication or maintenance of low viral loads," Working papers WP 3939-97., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    17. Guo, Wenjuan & Zhang, Qimin, 2021. "Explicit numerical approximation for an impulsive stochastic age-structured HIV infection model with Markovian switching," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 86-115.
    18. Jeremie Guedj & Rodolphe Thiébaut & Daniel Commenges, 2011. "Joint Modeling of the Clinical Progression and of the Biomarkers' Dynamics Using a Mechanistic Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 59-66, March.
    19. González, Ramón E.R. & Coutinho, Sérgio & Zorzenon dos Santos, Rita Maria & de Figueirêdo, Pedro Hugo, 2013. "Dynamics of the HIV infection under antiretroviral therapy: A cellular automata approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(19), pages 4701-4716.
    20. Chris Fields, 2015. "How small is the center of science? Short cross-disciplinary cycles in co-authorship graphs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1287-1306, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0008447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.