IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0000522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phylogeny of Diving Beetles Reveals a Coevolutionary Arms Race between the Sexes

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Bergsten
  • Kelly B Miller

Abstract

Background: Darwin illustrated his sexual selection theory with male and female morphology of diving beetles, but maintained a cooperative view of their interaction. Present theory suggests that instead sexual conflict should be a widespread evolutionary force driving both intersexual coevolutionary arms races and speciation. Methodology/Principal Findings: We combined Bayesian phylogenetics, complete taxon sampling and a multi-gene approach to test the arms race scenario on a robust diving beetle phylogeny. As predicted, suction cups in males and modified dorsal surfaces in females showed a pronounced coevolutionary pattern. The female dorsal modifications impair the attachment ability of male suction cups, but each antagonistic novelty in females corresponds to counter-differentiation of suction cups in males. Conclusions: A recently diverged sibling species pair in Japan is possibly one consequence of this arms race and we suggest that future studies on hypoxia might reveal the key to the extraordinary selection for female counter-adaptations in diving beetles.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Bergsten & Kelly B Miller, 2007. "Phylogeny of Diving Beetles Reveals a Coevolutionary Arms Race between the Sexes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(6), pages 1-6, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0000522
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000522
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000522&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0000522?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bryan Kolaczkowski & Joseph W. Thornton, 2004. "Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous," Nature, Nature, vol. 431(7011), pages 980-984, October.
    2. Göran Arnqvist & Locke Rowe, 2002. "Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6873), pages 787-789, February.
    3. Sergey Gavrilets, 2000. "Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6772), pages 886-889, February.
    4. Oliver Y. Martin & David J. Hosken, 2003. "The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6943), pages 979-982, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. April M Wright & David M Hillis, 2014. "Bayesian Analysis Using a Simple Likelihood Model Outperforms Parsimony for Estimation of Phylogeny from Discrete Morphological Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-6, October.
    2. Hung D Nguyen & Maki Yoshihama & Naoya Kenmochi, 2005. "New Maximum Likelihood Estimators for Eukaryotic Intron Evolution," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(7), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Charles Cunningham & Jorge E Parra & Lucy Coals & Marcela Beltrán & Sama Zefania & Tamás Székely, 2018. "Social interactions predict genetic diversification: an experimental manipulation in shorebirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(3), pages 609-618.
    4. Leigh W Simmons, 2018. "Sperm competition, sexual conflict, and speciation: a comment on Tinghitella et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(4), pages 800-800.
    5. Janette W Boughman, 2018. "When does male competition foster speciation?: a comment on Tinghitella et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(4), pages 801-802.
    6. Jussi Määttä & Teemu Roos, 2016. "Maximum Parsimony and the Skewness Test: A Simulation Study of the Limits of Applicability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0000522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.