IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v423y2003i6943d10.1038_nature01752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Y. Martin

    (Zoological Museum, University of Zürich)

  • David J. Hosken

    (Zoological Museum, University of Zürich)

Abstract

Classical population-genetics theory suggests that reproductive isolation will evolve fastest in small isolated populations1. In contrast, recent theory suggests that divergence should occur fastest in larger allopatric populations2. The rationale behind this is that sexual conflict, potentially the strongest driver of speciation, is greater in larger, higher-density populations. This idea is highly controversial3 and has little experimental support4,5. Here we show, using replicate fly populations with varying levels of sexual conflict, that larger, more dense populations with more sexual conflict diverged to a greater degree than small populations with relaxed conflict. This result strongly suggests that speciation can occur rapidly in large populations through increased sexual conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Y. Martin & David J. Hosken, 2003. "The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6943), pages 979-982, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:423:y:2003:i:6943:d:10.1038_nature01752
    DOI: 10.1038/nature01752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01752
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature01752?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janette W Boughman, 2018. "When does male competition foster speciation?: a comment on Tinghitella et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(4), pages 801-802.
    2. Johannes Bergsten & Kelly B Miller, 2007. "Phylogeny of Diving Beetles Reveals a Coevolutionary Arms Race between the Sexes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(6), pages 1-6, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:423:y:2003:i:6943:d:10.1038_nature01752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.