IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1009305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ciona Brachyury proximal and distal enhancers have different FGF dose-response relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew J Harder
  • Julie Hix
  • Wendy M Reeves
  • Michael T Veeman

Abstract

Many genes are regulated by two or more enhancers that drive similar expression patterns. Evolutionary theory suggests that these seemingly redundant enhancers must have functionally important differences. In the simple ascidian chordate Ciona, the transcription factor Brachyury is induced exclusively in the presumptive notochord downstream of lineage specific regulators and FGF-responsive Ets family transcription factors. Here we exploit the ability to finely titrate FGF signaling activity via the MAPK pathway using the MEK inhibitor U0126 to quantify the dependence of transcription driven by different Brachyury reporter constructs on this direct upstream regulator. We find that the more powerful promoter-adjacent proximal enhancer and a weaker distal enhancer have fundamentally different dose-response relationships to MAPK inhibition. The Distal enhancer is more sensitive to MAPK inhibition but shows a less cooperative response, whereas the Proximal enhancer is less sensitive and more cooperative. A longer construct containing both enhancers has a complex dose-response curve that supports the idea that the proximal and distal enhancers are moderately super-additive. We show that the overall expression loss from intermediate doses of U0126 is not only a function of the fraction of cells expressing these reporters, but also involves graded decreases in expression at the single-cell level. Expression of the endogenous gene shows a comparable dose-response relationship to the full length reporter, and we find that different notochord founder cells are differentially sensitive to MAPK inhibition. Together, these results indicate that although the two Brachyury enhancers have qualitatively similar expression patterns, they respond to FGF in quantitatively different ways and act together to drive high levels of Brachyury expression with a characteristic input/output relationship. This indicates that they are fundamentally not equivalent genetic elements.Author summary: When and where genes are expressed is controlled by regulatory DNA regions known as enhancers. Genes often have multiple enhancers that control expression in different cell types or embryonic regions, but there are also genes that have multiple enhancers that control near-identical expression patterns. These ‘shadow’ enhancers are common features of many animal genomes, but it is unclear to what extent they are truly identical in function. Here we studied a pair of shadow enhancers for the notochord-specific gene Brachyury in the simple model chordate Ciona that are both directly activated by the same signaling pathway. We titrated the activity of this pathway with graded doses of a pharmacological inhibitor and measured the effects in quantitative enhancer assays. We found that the two enhancers had significant differences in sensitivity and cooperativity to the same shared regulator and are thus not identical in function when assessed quantitatively. We also identified subtle differences in sensitivity to this upstream signal between different notochord precursor cells.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew J Harder & Julie Hix & Wendy M Reeves & Michael T Veeman, 2021. "Ciona Brachyury proximal and distal enhancers have different FGF dose-response relationships," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009305
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009305
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009305&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Osterwalder & Iros Barozzi & Virginie Tissières & Yoko Fukuda-Yuzawa & Brandon J. Mannion & Sarah Y. Afzal & Elizabeth A. Lee & Yiwen Zhu & Ingrid Plajzer-Frick & Catherine S. Pickle & Momoe Kat, 2018. "Enhancer redundancy provides phenotypic robustness in mammalian development," Nature, Nature, vol. 554(7691), pages 239-243, February.
    2. Nicolás Frankel & Gregory K. Davis & Diego Vargas & Shu Wang & François Payre & David L. Stern, 2010. "Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7305), pages 490-493, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markus Götz & Olivier Messina & Sergio Espinola & Jean-Bernard Fiche & Marcelo Nollmann, 2022. "Multiple parameters shape the 3D chromatin structure of single nuclei at the doc locus in Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Andrea Wilderman & Eva D’haene & Machteld Baetens & Tara N. Yankee & Emma Wentworth Winchester & Nicole Glidden & Ellen Roets & Jo Dorpe & Sandra Janssens & Danny E. Miller & Miranda Galey & Kari M. B, 2024. "A distant global control region is essential for normal expression of anterior HOXA genes during mouse and human craniofacial development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Jin Woo Oh & Michael A. Beer, 2024. "Gapped-kmer sequence modeling robustly identifies regulatory vocabularies and distal enhancers conserved between evolutionarily distant mammals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Brent S. Perlman & Noah Burget & Yeqiao Zhou & Gregory W. Schwartz & Jelena Petrovic & Zora Modrusan & Robert B. Faryabi, 2024. "Enhancer-promoter hubs organize transcriptional networks promoting oncogenesis and drug resistance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Jan-Renier Moonen & James Chappell & Minyi Shi & Tsutomu Shinohara & Dan Li & Maxwell R. Mumbach & Fan Zhang & Ramesh V. Nair & Joseph Nasser & Daniel H. Mai & Shalina Taylor & Lingli Wang & Ross J. M, 2022. "KLF4 recruits SWI/SNF to increase chromatin accessibility and reprogram the endothelial enhancer landscape under laminar shear stress," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Raquel Rouco & Olimpia Bompadre & Antonella Rauseo & Olivier Fazio & Rodrigue Peraldi & Fabrizio Thorel & Guillaume Andrey, 2021. "Cell-specific alterations in Pitx1 regulatory landscape activation caused by the loss of a single enhancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Daniela Michelatti & Sven Beyes & Chiara Bernardis & Maria Luce Negri & Leonardo Morelli & Naiara Garcia Bediaga & Vittoria Poli & Luca Fagnocchi & Sara Lago & Sarah D’Annunzio & Nicole Cona & Ilaria , 2024. "Oncogenic enhancers prime quiescent metastatic cells to escape NK immune surveillance by eliciting transcriptional memory," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Christopher Chase Bolt & Lucille Lopez-Delisle & Aurélie Hintermann & Bénédicte Mascrez & Antonella Rauseo & Guillaume Andrey & Denis Duboule, 2022. "Context-dependent enhancer function revealed by targeted inter-TAD relocation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Fabrice Darbellay & Anna Ramisch & Lucille Lopez-Delisle & Michael Kosicki & Antonella Rauseo & Zahra Jouini & Axel Visel & Guillaume Andrey, 2024. "Pre-hypertrophic chondrogenic enhancer landscape of limb and axial skeleton development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Dohoon Lee & Jeewon Yang & Sun Kim, 2022. "Learning the histone codes with large genomic windows and three-dimensional chromatin interactions using transformer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Matthieu Santos & Stéphanie Backer & Frédéric Auradé & Matthew Man-Kin Wong & Maud Wurmser & Rémi Pierre & Francina Langa & Marcio Cruzeiro & Alain Schmitt & Jean-Paul Concordet & Athanassia Sotiropou, 2022. "A fast Myosin super enhancer dictates muscle fiber phenotype through competitive interactions with Myosin genes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Xuemeng Zhou & Tsz Wing Sam & Ah Young Lee & Danny Leung, 2021. "Mouse strain-specific polymorphic provirus functions as cis-regulatory element leading to epigenomic and transcriptomic variations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Sandra Kessler & Maryline Minoux & Onkar Joshi & Yousra Zouari & Sebastien Ducret & Fiona Ross & Nathalie Vilain & Adwait Salvi & Joachim Wolff & Hubertus Kohler & Michael B. Stadler & Filippo M. Rijl, 2023. "A multiple super-enhancer region establishes inter-TAD interactions and controls Hoxa function in cranial neural crest," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Mukta Kundu & Alexander Kuzin & Tzu-Yang Lin & Chi-Hon Lee & Thomas Brody & Ward F Odenwald, 2013. "cis-Regulatory Complexity within a Large Non-Coding Region in the Drosophila Genome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Naoko Koyano-Nakagawa & Wuming Gong & Satyabrata Das & Joshua W. M. Theisen & Tran B. Swanholm & Daniel Ly & Nikita Dsouza & Bhairab N. Singh & Hiroko Kawakami & Samantha Young & Katherine Q. Chen & Y, 2022. "Etv2 regulates enhancer chromatin status to initiate Shh expression in the limb bud," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.