IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1007385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ancestry-specific recent effective population size in the Americas

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon R Browning
  • Brian L Browning
  • Martha L Daviglus
  • Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu
  • Neil Schneiderman
  • Robert C Kaplan
  • Cathy C Laurie

Abstract

Populations change in size over time due to factors such as population growth, migration, bottleneck events, natural disasters, and disease. The historical effective size of a population affects the power and resolution of genetic association studies. For admixed populations, it is not only the overall effective population size that is of interest, but also the effective sizes of the component ancestral populations. We use identity by descent and local ancestry inferred from genome-wide genetic data to estimate overall and ancestry-specific effective population size during the past hundred generations for nine admixed American populations from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos, and for African-American and European-American populations from two US cities. In these populations, the estimated pre-admixture effective sizes of the ancestral populations vary by sampled population, suggesting that the ancestors of different sampled populations were drawn from different sub-populations. In addition, we estimate that overall effective population sizes dropped substantially in the generations immediately after the commencement of European and African immigration, reaching a minimum around 12 generations ago, but rebounded within a small number of generations afterwards. Of the populations that we considered, the population of individuals originating from Puerto Rico has the smallest bottleneck size of one thousand, while the Pittsburgh African-American population has the largest bottleneck size of two hundred thousand.Author summary: Using genome-wide genetic data on several hundred individuals sampled from a population, we can estimate the current effective size of the population and the changes in effective size that have occurred over the past hundred generations. Many populations in the Americas are admixed, having ancestry from Europe, Africa, and the Americas. In such cases, one can learn not only about the effective population size history of the admixed population since admixture, but also about the effective population size histories of the contributing ancestral populations. In this paper we develop methodology for estimating past effective population size and analyze data from Hispanic, African-American, and European-American populations resident in the United States. We observe differences between populations in their historical effective sizes. These differences are useful for understanding differences in disease incidence between populations and for identifying populations that will maximize power in genetic association studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon R Browning & Brian L Browning & Martha L Daviglus & Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu & Neil Schneiderman & Robert C Kaplan & Cathy C Laurie, 2018. "Ancestry-specific recent effective population size in the Americas," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1007385
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007385
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007385&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007385?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerome Kelleher & Alison M Etheridge & Gilean McVean, 2016. "Efficient Coalescent Simulation and Genealogical Analysis for Large Sample Sizes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Alkes L Price & Arti Tandon & Nick Patterson & Kathleen C Barnes & Nicholas Rafaels & Ingo Ruczinski & Terri H Beaty & Rasika Mathias & David Reich & Simon Myers, 2009. "Sensitive Detection of Chromosomal Segments of Distinct Ancestry in Admixed Populations," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Shriner & Adebowale Adeyemo & Charles N Rotimi, 2011. "Joint Ancestry and Association Testing in Admixed Individuals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Melissa J Hubisz & Amy L Williams & Adam Siepel, 2020. "Mapping gene flow between ancient hominins through demography-aware inference of the ancestral recombination graph," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Sergio F. Nigenda-Morales & Meixi Lin & Paulina G. Nuñez-Valencia & Christopher C. Kyriazis & Annabel C. Beichman & Jacqueline A. Robinson & Aaron P. Ragsdale & Jorge Urbán R. & Frederick I. Archer & , 2023. "The genomic footprint of whaling and isolation in fin whale populations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Ralph, Peter L., 2019. "An empirical approach to demographic inference with genomic data," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 91-101.
    5. Zihao Wang & Wenxi Wang & Xiaoming Xie & Yongfa Wang & Zhengzhao Yang & Huiru Peng & Mingming Xin & Yingyin Yao & Zhaorong Hu & Jie Liu & Zhenqi Su & Chaojie Xie & Baoyun Li & Zhongfu Ni & Qixin Sun &, 2022. "Dispersed emergence and protracted domestication of polyploid wheat uncovered by mosaic ancestral haploblock inference," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Robert Brown & Bogdan Pasaniuc, 2014. "Enhanced Methods for Local Ancestry Assignment in Sequenced Admixed Individuals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-1, April.
    7. Vasili Pankratov & Milyausha Yunusbaeva & Sergei Ryakhovsky & Maksym Zarodniuk & Bayazit Yunusbayev, 2022. "Prioritizing autoimmunity risk variants for functional analyses by fine-mapping mutations under natural selection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Michael DeGiorgio & Zachary A Szpiech, 2022. "A spatially aware likelihood test to detect sweeps from haplotype distributions," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-37, April.
    9. Ali Mahmoudi & Jere Koskela & Jerome Kelleher & Yao-ban Chan & David Balding, 2022. "Bayesian inference of ancestral recombination graphs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Kerdoncuff, Elise & Lambert, Amaury & Achaz, Guillaume, 2020. "Testing for population decline using maximal linkage disequilibrium blocks," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 171-181.
    11. David A Turissini & Daniel R Matute, 2017. "Fine scale mapping of genomic introgressions within the Drosophila yakuba clade," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-40, September.
    12. Parul Johri & Wolfgang Stephan & Jeffrey D Jensen, 2022. "Soft selective sweeps: Addressing new definitions, evaluating competing models, and interpreting empirical outliers," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-12, February.
    13. Simone Rubinacci & Olivier Delaneau & Jonathan Marchini, 2020. "Genotype imputation using the Positional Burrows Wheeler Transform," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Dominic Nelson & Jerome Kelleher & Aaron P Ragsdale & Claudia Moreau & Gil McVean & Simon Gravel, 2020. "Accounting for long-range correlations in genome-wide simulations of large cohorts," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, May.
    15. Andrea Fulgione & Célia Neto & Ahmed F. Elfarargi & Emmanuel Tergemina & Shifa Ansari & Mehmet Göktay & Herculano Dinis & Nina Döring & Pádraic J. Flood & Sofia Rodriguez-Pacheco & Nora Walden & Marcu, 2022. "Parallel reduction in flowering time from de novo mutations enable evolutionary rescue in colonizing lineages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Miró Pina, Verónica & Joly, Émilien & Siri-Jégousse, Arno, 2023. "Estimating the Lambda measure in multiple-merger coalescents," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 94-101.
    17. Sam Tallman & Maria das Dores Sungo & Sílvio Saranga & Sandra Beleza, 2023. "Whole genomes from Angola and Mozambique inform about the origins and dispersals of major African migrations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Victoria L. Sork & Shawn J. Cokus & Sorel T. Fitz-Gibbon & Aleksey V. Zimin & Daniela Puiu & Jesse A. Garcia & Paul F. Gugger & Claudia L. Henriquez & Ying Zhen & Kirk E. Lohmueller & Matteo Pellegrin, 2022. "High-quality genome and methylomes illustrate features underlying evolutionary success of oaks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Max Lundberg & Alexander Mackintosh & Anna Petri & Staffan Bensch, 2023. "Inversions maintain differences between migratory phenotypes of a songbird," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Jerome Kelleher & Kevin R Thornton & Jaime Ashander & Peter L Ralph, 2018. "Efficient pedigree recording for fast population genetics simulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1007385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.