IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1006869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting epistasis with the marginal epistasis test in genetic mapping studies of quantitative traits

Author

Listed:
  • Lorin Crawford
  • Ping Zeng
  • Sayan Mukherjee
  • Xiang Zhou

Abstract

Epistasis, commonly defined as the interaction between multiple genes, is an important genetic component underlying phenotypic variation. Many statistical methods have been developed to model and identify epistatic interactions between genetic variants. However, because of the large combinatorial search space of interactions, most epistasis mapping methods face enormous computational challenges and often suffer from low statistical power due to multiple test correction. Here, we present a novel, alternative strategy for mapping epistasis: instead of directly identifying individual pairwise or higher-order interactions, we focus on mapping variants that have non-zero marginal epistatic effects—the combined pairwise interaction effects between a given variant and all other variants. By testing marginal epistatic effects, we can identify candidate variants that are involved in epistasis without the need to identify the exact partners with which the variants interact, thus potentially alleviating much of the statistical and computational burden associated with standard epistatic mapping procedures. Our method is based on a variance component model, and relies on a recently developed variance component estimation method for efficient parameter inference and p-value computation. We refer to our method as the “MArginal ePIstasis Test”, or MAPIT. With simulations, we show how MAPIT can be used to estimate and test marginal epistatic effects, produce calibrated test statistics under the null, and facilitate the detection of pairwise epistatic interactions. We further illustrate the benefits of MAPIT in a QTL mapping study by analyzing the gene expression data of over 400 individuals from the GEUVADIS consortium.Author summary: Epistasis is an important genetic component that underlies phenotypic variation and is also a key mechanism that accounts for missing heritability. Identifying epistatic interactions in genetic association studies can help us better understand the genetic architecture of complex traits and diseases. However, the ability to identify epistatic interactions in practice faces important statistical and computational challenges. Standard statistical methods scan through all-pairs (or all high-orders) of interactions, and the large number of interaction combinations results in slow computation time and low statistical power. We propose an alternative mapping strategy and a new variance component method for identifying epistasis. Our method examines one variant at a time, and estimates and tests its marginal epistatic effect—the combined pairwise interaction effects between a given variant and all other variants. By testing for marginal epistatic effects, we can identify variants that are involved in epistasis without the need of explicitly searching for interactions. Our method also relies on a recently developed variance component estimation method for efficient and robust parameter inference, and accurate p-value computation. We illustrate the benefits of our method using simulations and real data applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorin Crawford & Ping Zeng & Sayan Mukherjee & Xiang Zhou, 2017. "Detecting epistasis with the marginal epistasis test in genetic mapping studies of quantitative traits," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-37, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1006869
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006869
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006869&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiang Zhou & Peter Carbonetto & Matthew Stephens, 2013. "Polygenic Modeling with Bayesian Sparse Linear Mixed Models," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Juergen Kroymann & Thomas Mitchell-Olds, 2005. "Epistasis and balanced polymorphism influencing complex trait variation," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7038), pages 95-98, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominic Holland & Oleksandr Frei & Rahul Desikan & Chun-Chieh Fan & Alexey A Shadrin & Olav B Smeland & V S Sundar & Paul Thompson & Ole A Andreassen & Anders M Dale, 2020. "Beyond SNP heritability: Polygenicity and discoverability of phenotypes estimated with a univariate Gaussian mixture model," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, May.
    2. Yiming Hu & Qiongshi Lu & Ryan Powles & Xinwei Yao & Can Yang & Fang Fang & Xinran Xu & Hongyu Zhao, 2017. "Leveraging functional annotations in genetic risk prediction for human complex diseases," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Carla Márquez-Luna & Steven Gazal & Po-Ru Loh & Samuel S. Kim & Nicholas Furlotte & Adam Auton & Alkes L. Price, 2021. "Incorporating functional priors improves polygenic prediction accuracy in UK Biobank and 23andMe data sets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Yanyi Song & Xiang Zhou & Min Zhang & Wei Zhao & Yongmei Liu & Sharon L. R. Kardia & Ana V. Diez Roux & Belinda L. Needham & Jennifer A. Smith & Bhramar Mukherjee, 2020. "Bayesian shrinkage estimation of high dimensional causal mediation effects in omics studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 700-710, September.
    5. Hui Li & Rahul Mazumder & Xihong Lin, 2023. "Accurate and efficient estimation of local heritability using summary statistics and the linkage disequilibrium matrix," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. McMahan Christopher & Baurley James & Bridges William & Joyner Chase & Kacamarga Muhamad Fitra & Lund Robert & Pardamean Carissa & Pardamean Bens, 2017. "A Bayesian hierarchical model for identifying significant polygenic effects while controlling for confounding and repeated measures," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 16(5-6), pages 407-419, December.
    7. Wei Xu & Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray & David M. Morris & Chengjia Wang & Calum D. Gray & Samuel Sjöström & Giorgos Papanastasiou & Sammy Badr & Julien Paccou & Xue Li & Paul R. H. J. Timmers & Maria Timofeev, 2025. "Deep learning and genome-wide association meta-analyses of bone marrow adiposity in the UK Biobank," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Longpeng Bai & Kaiyi Wang & Qiusi Zhang & Qi Zhang & Xiaofeng Wang & Shouhui Pan & Liyang Zhang & Xuliang He & Ran Li & Dongfeng Zhang & Yanyun Han, 2025. "A Study of Maize Genotype–Environment Interaction Based on Deep K-Means Clustering Neural Network," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Arunabha Majumdar & Tanushree Haldar & Sourabh Bhattacharya & John S Witte, 2018. "An efficient Bayesian meta-analysis approach for studying cross-phenotype genetic associations," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-32, February.
    10. Marie Bouteillé & Gaëlle Rolland & Crispulo Balsera & Olivier Loudet & Bertrand Muller, 2012. "Disentangling the Intertwined Genetic Bases of Root and Shoot Growth in Arabidopsis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-13, February.
    11. Gao Wang & Abhishek Sarkar & Peter Carbonetto & Matthew Stephens, 2020. "A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(5), pages 1273-1300, December.
    12. Heather E Wheeler & Kaanan P Shah & Jonathon Brenner & Tzintzuni Garcia & Keston Aquino-Michaels & GTEx Consortium & Nancy J Cox & Dan L Nicolae & Hae Kyung Im, 2016. "Survey of the Heritability and Sparse Architecture of Gene Expression Traits across Human Tissues," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, November.
    13. Lulu Shang & Wei Zhao & Yi Zhe Wang & Zheng Li & Jerome J. Choi & Minjung Kho & Thomas H. Mosley & Sharon L. R. Kardia & Jennifer A. Smith & Xiang Zhou, 2023. "meQTL mapping in the GENOA study reveals genetic determinants of DNA methylation in African Americans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Abrahamsen, Tavis & Hobert, James P., 2019. "Fast Monte Carlo Markov chains for Bayesian shrinkage models with random effects," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 61-80.
    15. Ulrike Ober & Wen Huang & Michael Magwire & Martin Schlather & Henner Simianer & Trudy F C Mackay, 2015. "Accounting for Genetic Architecture Improves Sequence Based Genomic Prediction for a Drosophila Fitness Trait," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Casey S Greene & Nadia M Penrod & Scott M Williams & Jason H Moore, 2009. "Failure to Replicate a Genetic Association May Provide Important Clues About Genetic Architecture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-7, June.
    17. Sahir R Bhatnagar & Yi Yang & Tianyuan Lu & Erwin Schurr & JC Loredo-Osti & Marie Forest & Karim Oualkacha & Celia M T Greenwood, 2020. "Simultaneous SNP selection and adjustment for population structure in high dimensional prediction models," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Cristina C. Bastias & Aurélien Estarague & Denis Vile & Elza Gaignon & Cheng-Ruei Lee & Moises Exposito-Alonso & Cyrille Violle & François Vasseur, 2024. "Ecological trade-offs drive phenotypic and genetic differentiation of Arabidopsis thaliana in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Niloy Biswas & Anirban Bhattacharya & Pierre E. Jacob & James E. Johndrow, 2022. "Coupling‐based convergence assessment of some Gibbs samplers for high‐dimensional Bayesian regression with shrinkage priors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(3), pages 973-996, July.
    20. Saikat Banerjee & Lingyao Zeng & Heribert Schunkert & Johannes Söding, 2018. "Bayesian multiple logistic regression for case-control GWAS," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-27, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1006869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.