IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1009479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cortical feedback and gating in odor discrimination and generalization

Author

Listed:
  • Gaia Tavoni
  • David E Chen Kersen
  • Vijay Balasubramanian

Abstract

A central question in neuroscience is how context changes perception. In the olfactory system, for example, experiments show that task demands can drive divergence and convergence of cortical odor responses, likely underpinning olfactory discrimination and generalization. Here, we propose a simple statistical mechanism for this effect based on unstructured feedback from the central brain to the olfactory bulb, which represents the context associated with an odor, and sufficiently selective cortical gating of sensory inputs. Strikingly, the model predicts that both convergence and divergence of cortical odor patterns should increase when odors are initially more similar, an effect reported in recent experiments. The theory in turn predicts reversals of these trends following experimental manipulations and in neurological conditions that increase cortical excitability.Author summary: Contextual information can powerfully influence the neural representation and perception of sensory stimuli. Here, we propose a mechanism, based on unstructured feedback from the central brain to the sensory periphery, by which similar and different contexts lead to characteristic trends in convergence and divergence of cortical odor responses that are critically dependent on threshold to firing of cortical cells. The analysis predicts specific deficits in context-driven olfactory perceptual discrimination in neurological conditions of high cortical excitability, such as Alzheimer’s disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaia Tavoni & David E Chen Kersen & Vijay Balasubramanian, 2021. "Cortical feedback and gating in odor discrimination and generalization," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-35, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009479
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009479
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009479&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dara L. Sosulski & Maria Lissitsyna Bloom & Tyler Cutforth & Richard Axel & Sandeep Robert Datta, 2011. "Distinct representations of olfactory information in different cortical centres," Nature, Nature, vol. 472(7342), pages 213-216, April.
    2. Sulagna Ghosh & Stephen D. Larson & Hooman Hefzi & Zachary Marnoy & Tyler Cutforth & Kartheek Dokka & Kristin K. Baldwin, 2011. "Sensory maps in the olfactory cortex defined by long-range viral tracing of single neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 472(7342), pages 217-220, April.
    3. Claire Chambers & Sahar Akram & Vincent Adam & Claire Pelofi & Maneesh Sahani & Shihab Shamma & Daniel Pressnitzer, 2017. "Prior context in audition informs binding and shapes simple features," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Wilder Doucette & Diego Restrepo, 2008. "Profound Context-Dependent Plasticity of Mitral Cell Responses in Olfactory Bulb," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jürgen Kornmeier & Kriti Bhatia & Ellen Joos, 2021. "Top-down resolution of visual ambiguity – knowledge from the future or footprints from the past?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Geoffrey Terral & Evan Harrell & Gabriel Lepousez & Yohan Wards & Dinghuang Huang & Tiphaine Dolique & Giulio Casali & Antoine Nissant & Pierre-Marie Lledo & Guillaume Ferreira & Giovanni Marsicano & , 2024. "Endogenous cannabinoids in the piriform cortex tune olfactory perception," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Joseph D. Zak & Gautam Reddy & Vaibhav Konanur & Venkatesh N. Murthy, 2024. "Distinct information conveyed to the olfactory bulb by feedforward input from the nose and feedback from the cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.