IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1008817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting microbial growth dynamics in response to nutrient availability

Author

Listed:
  • Olga A Nev
  • Richard J Lindsay
  • Alys Jepson
  • Lisa Butt
  • Robert E Beardmore
  • Ivana Gudelj

Abstract

Developing mathematical models to accurately predict microbial growth dynamics remains a key challenge in ecology, evolution, biotechnology, and public health. To reproduce and grow, microbes need to take up essential nutrients from the environment, and mathematical models classically assume that the nutrient uptake rate is a saturating function of the nutrient concentration. In nature, microbes experience different levels of nutrient availability at all environmental scales, yet parameters shaping the nutrient uptake function are commonly estimated for a single initial nutrient concentration. This hampers the models from accurately capturing microbial dynamics when the environmental conditions change. To address this problem, we conduct growth experiments for a range of micro-organisms, including human fungal pathogens, baker’s yeast, and common coliform bacteria, and uncover the following patterns. We observed that the maximal nutrient uptake rate and biomass yield were both decreasing functions of initial nutrient concentration. While a functional form for the relationship between biomass yield and initial nutrient concentration has been previously derived from first metabolic principles, here we also derive the form of the relationship between maximal nutrient uptake rate and initial nutrient concentration. Incorporating these two functions into a model of microbial growth allows for variable growth parameters and enables us to substantially improve predictions for microbial dynamics in a range of initial nutrient concentrations, compared to keeping growth parameters fixed.Author summary: Our ability to predict microbial population dynamics is of key importance for the fields of ecology, evolution, biotechnology, and public health. Yet, current mathematical models used to predict microbial growth have an inherent limitation. They are parameterised using empirical measurements of microbial growth performed at a single initial nutrient concentration. This overlooks the fact that in nature microbes face different levels of nutrient availability at all environmental scales: from glucose fluctuations in the blood of critically ill patients to dissolved organic carbon fluctuations in marine environments. Current literature overwhelmingly suggests that estimating growth parameters at a single initial nutrient concentration hampers the models from accurately capturing microbial dynamics when the environmental conditions change. Here we tackle this problem using an interplay between mathematical modelling and laboratory experiments spanning human fungal pathogens, common coliform bacteria, and baker’s yeast. We propose a modelling approach that incorporates growth parameters as a function of initial nutrient concentration. Importantly, we demonstrate that our approach performs significantly better at predicting microbial growth and the outcomes of between-species competition across different initial nutrient concentrations, compared to the classical models which assume fixed growth parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga A Nev & Richard J Lindsay & Alys Jepson & Lisa Butt & Robert E Beardmore & Ivana Gudelj, 2021. "Predicting microbial growth dynamics in response to nutrient availability," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008817
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008817
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008817&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert E. Beardmore & Ivana Gudelj & David A. Lipson & Laurence D. Hurst, 2011. "Metabolic trade-offs and the maintenance of the fittest and the flattest," Nature, Nature, vol. 472(7343), pages 342-346, April.
    2. Emily J. Zakem & Alia Al-Haj & Matthew J. Church & Gert L. Dijken & Stephanie Dutkiewicz & Sarah Q. Foster & Robinson W. Fulweiler & Matthew M. Mills & Michael J. Follows, 2018. "Ecological control of nitrite in the upper ocean," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Jeff Gore & Hyun Youk & Alexander van Oudenaarden, 2009. "Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 459(7244), pages 253-256, May.
    4. Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo & Fernando T. Maestre & Peter B. Reich & Thomas C. Jeffries & Juan J. Gaitan & Daniel Encinar & Miguel Berdugo & Colin D. Campbell & Brajesh K. Singh, 2016. "Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, April.
    5. R. Craig MacLean & Ivana Gudelj, 2006. "Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 498-501, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yasa Baig & Helena R. Ma & Helen Xu & Lingchong You, 2023. "Autoencoder neural networks enable low dimensional structure analyses of microbial growth dynamics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Jianying Jiang & Junyuan Guo, 2023. "Treatment Performance of Municipal Sewage in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor (SMBR) and Mechanism of Biochar to Reduce Membrane Fouling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivana Gudelj & Margie Kinnersley & Peter Rashkov & Karen Schmidt & Frank Rosenzweig, 2016. "Stability of Cross-Feeding Polymorphisms in Microbial Communities," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Elhanati, Yuval & Schuster, Stefan & Brenner, Naama, 2011. "Dynamic modeling of cooperative protein secretion in microorganism populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 49-63.
    3. Martin Schuster & Eric Foxall & David Finch & Hal Smith & Patrick De Leenheer, 2017. "Tragedy of the commons in the chemostat," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.
    4. David Bruce Borenstein & Yigal Meir & Joshua W Shaevitz & Ned S Wingreen, 2013. "Non-Local Interaction via Diffusible Resource Prevents Coexistence of Cooperators and Cheaters in a Lattice Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    5. Jorge Peña & Yannick Rochat, 2012. "Bipartite Graphs as Models of Population Structures in Evolutionary Multiplayer Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Xiaojie Chen & Attila Szolnoki, 2018. "Punishment and inspection for governing the commons in a feedback-evolving game," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Felix J H Hol & Peter Galajda & Krisztina Nagy & Rutger G Woolthuis & Cees Dekker & Juan E Keymer, 2013. "Spatial Structure Facilitates Cooperation in a Social Dilemma: Empirical Evidence from a Bacterial Community," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-10, October.
    8. Aditi Sengupta & Priyanka Kushwaha & Antonia Jim & Peter A. Troch & Raina Maier, 2020. "New Soil, Old Plants, and Ubiquitous Microbes: Evaluating the Potential of Incipient Basaltic Soil to Support Native Plant Growth and Influence Belowground Soil Microbial Community Composition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Kerry E Boyle & Hilary Monaco & Dave van Ditmarsch & Maxime Deforet & Joao B Xavier, 2015. "Integration of Metabolic and Quorum Sensing Signals Governing the Decision to Cooperate in a Bacterial Social Trait," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, June.
    10. Friedrich Scherzinger & Martin Schädler & Thomas Reitz & Rui Yin & Harald Auge & Ines Merbach & Christiane Roscher & W Stanley Harpole & Evgenia Blagodatskaya & Julia Siebert & Marcel Ciobanu & Fabian, 2024. "Sustainable land management enhances ecological and economic multifunctionality under ambient and future climate," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Claudius Gros, 2022. "Generic catastrophic poverty when selfish investors exploit a degradable common resource," Papers 2208.08171, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    12. Wu, Yu’e & Zhang, Zhipeng & Wang, Xinyu & Chang, Shuhua, 2019. "Impact of probabilistic incentives on the evolution of cooperation in complex topologies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 307-314.
    13. Li, Guochun & Niu, Wenquan & Ma, Li & Du, Yadan & Zhang, Qian & Gan, Haicheng & Siddique, Kadambot H.M., 2024. "Effects of drip irrigation upper limits on rhizosphere soil bacterial communities, soil organic carbon, and wheat yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    14. Richard J. Lindsay & Philippa J. Holder & Mark Hewlett & Ivana Gudelj, 2024. "Experimental evolution of yeast shows that public-goods upregulation can evolve despite challenges from exploitative non-producers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Peña, Jorge & Nöldeke, Georg & Lehmann, Laurent, 2014. "Relatedness and synergies of kind and scale in the evolution of helping," Working papers 2014/09, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    16. Brian McLoone & Wai-Tong Louis Fan & Adam Pham & Rory Smead & Laurence Loewe, 2018. "Stochasticity, Selection, and the Evolution of Cooperation in a Two-Level Moran Model of the Snowdrift Game," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-14, February.
    17. Kazufumi Hosoda & Shingo Suzuki & Yoshinori Yamauchi & Yasunori Shiroguchi & Akiko Kashiwagi & Naoaki Ono & Kotaro Mori & Tetsuya Yomo, 2011. "Cooperative Adaptation to Establishment of a Synthetic Bacterial Mutualism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-9, February.
    18. Trang T. H. Nguyen & Emily J. Zakem & Ali Ebrahimi & Julia Schwartzman & Tolga Caglar & Kapil Amarnath & Uria Alcolombri & François J. Peaudecerf & Terence Hwa & Roman Stocker & Otto X. Cordero & Naom, 2022. "Microbes contribute to setting the ocean carbon flux by altering the fate of sinking particulates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Robin Watson & Thomas J. H. Morgan & Rachel L. Kendal & Julie Van de Vyver & Jeremy Kendal, 2021. "Social Learning Strategies and Cooperative Behaviour: Evidence of Payoff Bias, but Not Prestige or Conformity, in a Social Dilemma Game," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, November.
    20. Alicia Sanchez-Gorostiaga & Djordje Bajić & Melisa L Osborne & Juan F Poyatos & Alvaro Sanchez, 2019. "High-order interactions distort the functional landscape of microbial consortia," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-34, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.