IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scale free topology as an effective feedback system

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Rivkind
  • Hallel Schreier
  • Naama Brenner
  • Omri Barak

Abstract

Biological networks are often heterogeneous in their connectivity pattern, with degree distributions featuring a heavy tail of highly connected hubs. The implications of this heterogeneity on dynamical properties are a topic of much interest. Here we show that interpreting topology as a feedback circuit can provide novel insights on dynamics. Based on the observation that in finite networks a small number of hubs have a disproportionate effect on the entire system, we construct an approximation by lumping these nodes into a single effective hub, which acts as a feedback loop with the rest of the nodes. We use this approximation to study dynamics of networks with scale-free degree distributions, focusing on their probability of convergence to fixed points. We find that the approximation preserves convergence statistics over a wide range of settings. Our mapping provides a parametrization of scale free topology which is predictive at the ensemble level and also retains properties of individual realizations. Specifically, outgoing hubs have an organizing role that can drive the network to convergence, in analogy to suppression of chaos by an external drive. In contrast, incoming hubs have no such property, resulting in a marked difference between the behavior of networks with outgoing vs. incoming scale free degree distribution. Combining feedback analysis with mean field theory predicts a transition between convergent and divergent dynamics which is corroborated by numerical simulations. Furthermore, they highlight the effect of a handful of outlying hubs, rather than of the connectivity distribution law as a whole, on network dynamics.Author summary: Nature abounds with complex networks of interacting elements—from the proteins in our cells, through neural networks in our brains, to species interacting in ecosystems. In all of these fields, the relation between network structure and dynamics is an important research question. A recurring feature of natural networks is their heterogeneous structure: individual elements exhibit a huge diversity of connectivity patterns, which complicates the understanding of network dynamics. To address this problem, we devised a simplified approximation for complex structured networks which captures their dynamical properties. Separating out the largest “hubs”—a small number of nodes with disproportionately high connectivity—we represent them by a single node linked to the rest of the network. This enables us to borrow concepts from control theory, where a system’s output is linked back to itself forming a feedback loop. In this analogy, hubs in heterogeneous networks implement a feedback circuit with the rest of the network. The analogy reveals how these hubs can coordinate the network and drive it more easily towards stable states. Our approach enables analyzing dynamical properties of heterogeneous networks, which is difficult to achieve with existing techniques. It is potentially applicable to many fields where heterogeneous networks are important.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Rivkind & Hallel Schreier & Naama Brenner & Omri Barak, 2020. "Scale free topology as an effective feedback system," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007825
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007825
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007825&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uzi Harush & Baruch Barzel, 2017. "Dynamic patterns of information flow in complex networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Jianxi Gao & Baruch Barzel & Albert-László Barabási, 2016. "Universal resilience patterns in complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 530(7590), pages 307-312, February.
    3. Rebecca Baumstark & Sonja Hänzelmann & Saburo Tsuru & Yolanda Schaerli & Mirko Francesconi & Francesco M. Mancuso & Robert Castelo & Mark Isalan, 2015. "The propagation of perturbations in rewired bacterial gene networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Leland H. Hartwell & John J. Hopfield & Stanislas Leibler & Andrew W. Murray, 1999. "From molecular to modular cell biology," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6761), pages 47-52, December.
    5. Steven H. Strogatz, 2001. "Exploring complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 410(6825), pages 268-276, March.
    6. Adiel Statman & Maya Kaufman & Amir Minerbi & Noam E Ziv & Naama Brenner, 2014. "Synaptic Size Dynamics as an Effectively Stochastic Process," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Hallel I. Schreier & Yoav Soen & Naama Brenner, 2017. "Exploratory adaptation in large random networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tu, Chengyi & Fan, Ying & Shi, Tianyu, 2024. "Dimensionality reduction of networked systems with separable coupling-dynamics: Theory and applications," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Joshua S Weitz & Philip N Benfey & Ned S Wingreen, 2007. "Evolution, Interactions, and Biological Networks," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-3, January.
    3. Lv, Changchun & Yuan, Ziwei & Si, Shubin & Duan, Dongli, 2021. "Robustness of scale-free networks with dynamical behavior against multi-node perturbation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Ye, Jiachen & Ji, Peng & Waxman, David & Lin, Wei & Moreno, Yamir, 2020. "Impact of intra and inter-cluster coupling balance on the performance of nonlinear networked systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. Zhao Li & Ren Zhuoming & Zhao Ziyi & Weng Tongfeng, 2024. "Topological perturbations on resilience of the world trade competition network," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Li, Yan & Jiang, Xiong-Fei & Tian, Yue & Li, Sai-Ping & Zheng, Bo, 2019. "Portfolio optimization based on network topology," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 671-681.
    7. Chen, Aimin & Wang, Pei & Zhou, Tianshou & Tian, Tianhai, 2022. "Balance of positive and negative regulation for trade-off between efficiency and resilience of high-dimensional networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).
    8. Zhonggui Lu & Wei Li & Yidi Wang & Siyang Zhou, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Ecological Networks in Nature Conservation from 1990 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Samrat Chatterjee & Dhiraj Kumar, 2011. "Unraveling the Design Principle for Motif Organization in Signaling Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Anupam Saxena & Hod Lipson & Francisco J Valero-Cuevas, 2012. "Functional Inference of Complex Anatomical Tendinous Networks at a Macroscopic Scale via Sparse Experimentation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Hütt, M.-Th. & Lüttge, U., 2005. "The interplay of synchronization and fluctuations reveals connectivity levels in networks of nonlinear oscillators," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 350(2), pages 207-226.
    12. Duan, Dongli & Bai, Xue & Rong, Yisheng & Hou, Gege & Hang, Jiale, 2022. "Controlling of nonlinear dynamical networks based on decoupling and re-coupling method," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Emerson, Isaac Arnold & Amala, Arumugam, 2017. "Protein contact maps: A binary depiction of protein 3D structures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 782-791.
    14. Faedo, Nicolás & García-Violini, Demián & Ringwood, John V., 2021. "Controlling synchronization in a complex network of nonlinear oscillators via feedback linearisation and H∞-control," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    15. Xiao‐Bing Hu & Hang Li & XiaoMei Guo & Pieter H. A. J. M. van Gelder & Peijun Shi, 2019. "Spatial Vulnerability of Network Systems under Spatially Local Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 162-179, January.
    16. Ruiz Vargas, E. & Mitchell, D.G.V. & Greening, S.G. & Wahl, L.M., 2014. "Topology of whole-brain functional MRI networks: Improving the truncated scale-free model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 405(C), pages 151-158.
    17. Igor Belykh & Mateusz Bocian & Alan R. Champneys & Kevin Daley & Russell Jeter & John H. G. Macdonald & Allan McRobie, 2021. "Emergence of the London Millennium Bridge instability without synchronisation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Berahmand, Kamal & Bouyer, Asgarali & Samadi, Negin, 2018. "A new centrality measure based on the negative and positive effects of clustering coefficient for identifying influential spreaders in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 41-54.
    19. Zhang, Yun & Liu, Yongguo & Li, Jieting & Zhu, Jiajing & Yang, Changhong & Yang, Wen & Wen, Chuanbiao, 2020. "WOCDA: A whale optimization based community detection algorithm," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 539(C).
    20. Soh, Harold & Lim, Sonja & Zhang, Tianyou & Fu, Xiuju & Lee, Gary Kee Khoon & Hung, Terence Gih Guang & Di, Pan & Prakasam, Silvester & Wong, Limsoon, 2010. "Weighted complex network analysis of travel routes on the Singapore public transportation system," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(24), pages 5852-5863.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.