IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility and Limitations of Using Gene Expression Data to Identify Functional Associations

Author

Listed:
  • Sahra Uygun
  • Cheng Peng
  • Melissa D Lehti-Shiu
  • Robert L Last
  • Shin-Han Shiu

Abstract

Gene co-expression has been widely used to hypothesize gene function through guilt-by association. However, it is not clear to what degree co-expression is informative, whether it can be applied to genes involved in different biological processes, and how the type of dataset impacts inferences about gene functions. Here our goal is to assess the utility and limitations of using co-expression as a criterion to recover functional associations between genes. By determining the percentage of gene pairs in a metabolic pathway with significant expression correlation, we found that many genes in the same pathway do not have similar transcript profiles and the choice of dataset, annotation quality, gene function, expression similarity measure, and clustering approach significantly impacts the ability to recover functional associations between genes using Arabidopsis thaliana as an example. Some datasets are more informative in capturing coordinated expression profiles and larger data sets are not always better. In addition, to recover the maximum number of known pathways and identify candidate genes with similar functions, it is important to explore rather exhaustively multiple dataset combinations, similarity measures, clustering algorithms and parameters. Finally, we validated the biological relevance of co-expression cluster memberships with an independent phenomics dataset and found that genes that consistently cluster with leucine degradation genes tend to have similar leucine levels in mutants. This study provides a framework for obtaining gene functional associations by maximizing the information that can be obtained from gene expression datasets.Author Summary: There remain genes with no known function even in the most well studied, model species. One common way to hypothesize gene function is based on the assumption that genes with similar expression profiles tend to have similar functions. However, using datasets and biological pathway information from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana as an example, we discovered that, although genes in the same pathways are functionally related, genes in only a subset of the pathways have highly similar expression patterns. In addition, our ability to hypothesize gene functions based on expression is significantly impacted by how the dataset is processed and combined as well as the methodology used to identify genes with similar expression. Therefore, multiple datasets and methods should be tested to maximize the functional information that we can get based on similarity in gene expression.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahra Uygun & Cheng Peng & Melissa D Lehti-Shiu & Robert L Last & Shin-Han Shiu, 2016. "Utility and Limitations of Using Gene Expression Data to Identify Functional Associations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-27, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005244
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005244
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005244&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang Bin & Horvath Steve, 2005. "A General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-45, August.
    2. Schäfer Juliane & Strimmer Korbinian, 2005. "A Shrinkage Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications for Functional Genomics," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-32, November.
    3. Robert Tibshirani & Guenther Walther & Trevor Hastie, 2001. "Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 411-423.
    4. Smyth Gordon K, 2004. "Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Zing Tsung-Yeh Tsai & Shin-Han Shiu & Huai-Kuang Tsai, 2015. "Contribution of Sequence Motif, Chromatin State, and DNA Structure Features to Predictive Models of Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lingxue Zhang & Seyoung Kim, 2014. "Learning Gene Networks under SNP Perturbations Using eQTL Datasets," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Dazard, Jean-Eudes & Sunil Rao, J., 2012. "Joint adaptive mean–variance regularization and variance stabilization of high dimensional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 2317-2333.
    3. Montazeri Zahra & Yanofsky Corey M. & Bickel David R., 2010. "Shrinkage Estimation of Effect Sizes as an Alternative to Hypothesis Testing Followed by Estimation in High-Dimensional Biology: Applications to Differential Gene Expression," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-33, June.
    4. Elisa Salviato & Vera Djordjilović & Monica Chiogna & Chiara Romualdi, 2019. "SourceSet: A graphical model approach to identify primary genes in perturbed biological pathways," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Xu, Ping & Brock, Guy N. & Parrish, Rudolph S., 2009. "Modified linear discriminant analysis approaches for classification of high-dimensional microarray data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 1674-1687, March.
    6. Jong Victor L. & Novianti Putri W. & Roes Kit C.B. & Eijkemans Marinus J.C., 2014. "Exploring homogeneity of correlation structures of gene expression datasets within and between etiological disease categories," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(6), pages 717-732, December.
    7. Atle van Beelen Granlund & Arnar Flatberg & Ann E Østvik & Ignat Drozdov & Bjørn I Gustafsson & Mark Kidd & Vidar Beisvag & Sverre H Torp & Helge L Waldum & Tom Christian Martinsen & Jan Kristian Damå, 2013. "Whole Genome Gene Expression Meta-Analysis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Colon Mucosa Demonstrates Lack of Major Differences between Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Blum Yuna & Houée-Bigot Magalie & Causeur David, 2016. "Sparse factor model for co-expression networks with an application using prior biological knowledge," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 253-272, June.
    9. Chuan Gao & Ian C McDowell & Shiwen Zhao & Christopher D Brown & Barbara E Engelhardt, 2016. "Context Specific and Differential Gene Co-expression Networks via Bayesian Biclustering," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-39, July.
    10. Min Jin Ha & Wei Sun, 2014. "Partial correlation matrix estimation using ridge penalty followed by thresholding and re-estimation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 762-770, September.
    11. Hannart, Alexis & Naveau, Philippe, 2014. "Estimating high dimensional covariance matrices: A new look at the Gaussian conjugate framework," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 149-162.
    12. Aaron C Ericsson & J Wade Davis & William Spollen & Nathan Bivens & Scott Givan & Catherine E Hagan & Mark McIntosh & Craig L Franklin, 2015. "Effects of Vendor and Genetic Background on the Composition of the Fecal Microbiota of Inbred Mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Thiemo Fetzer & Samuel Marden, 2017. "Take What You Can: Property Rights, Contestability and Conflict," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(601), pages 757-783, May.
    14. Avagyan, Vahe & Nogales, Francisco J., 2015. "D-trace Precision Matrix Estimation Using Adaptive Lasso Penalties," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 21775, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    15. Daniel Agness & Travis Baseler & Sylvain Chassang & Pascaline Dupas & Erik Snowberg, 2022. "Valuing the Time of the Self-Employed," CESifo Working Paper Series 9567, CESifo.
    16. Batool, Fatima & Hennig, Christian, 2021. "Clustering with the Average Silhouette Width," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    17. Yixuan Qiu & Jing Lei & Kathryn Roeder, 2023. "Gradient-based sparse principal component analysis with extensions to online learning," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(2), pages 339-360.
    18. Nicoleta Serban & Huijing Jiang, 2012. "Multilevel Functional Clustering Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 805-814, September.
    19. Ruiz Vargas, E. & Mitchell, D.G.V. & Greening, S.G. & Wahl, L.M., 2014. "Topology of whole-brain functional MRI networks: Improving the truncated scale-free model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 405(C), pages 151-158.
    20. Orietta Nicolis & Jean Paul Maidana & Fabian Contreras & Danilo Leal, 2024. "Analyzing the Impact of COVID-19 on Economic Sustainability: A Clustering Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-30, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.