IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Vascular Networks Branch Optimally or Randomly across Spatial Scales?

Author

Listed:
  • Elif Tekin
  • David Hunt
  • Mitchell G Newberry
  • Van M Savage

Abstract

Modern models that derive allometric relationships between metabolic rate and body mass are based on the architectural design of the cardiovascular system and presume sibling vessels are symmetric in terms of radius, length, flow rate, and pressure. Here, we study the cardiovascular structure of the human head and torso and of a mouse lung based on three-dimensional images processed via our software Angicart. In contrast to modern allometric theories, we find systematic patterns of asymmetry in vascular branching, potentially explaining previously documented mismatches between predictions (power-law or concave curvature) and observed empirical data (convex curvature) for the allometric scaling of metabolic rate. To examine why these systematic asymmetries in vascular branching might arise, we construct a mathematical framework to derive predictions based on local, junction-level optimality principles that have been proposed to be favored in the course of natural selection and development. The two most commonly used principles are material-cost optimizations (construction materials or blood volume) and optimization of efficient flow via minimization of power loss. We show that material-cost optimization solutions match with distributions for asymmetric branching across the whole network but do not match well for individual junctions. Consequently, we also explore random branching that is constrained at scales that range from local (junction-level) to global (whole network). We find that material-cost optimizations are the strongest predictor of vascular branching in the human head and torso, whereas locally or intermediately constrained random branching is comparable to material-cost optimizations for the mouse lung. These differences could be attributable to developmentally-programmed local branching for larger vessels and constrained random branching for smaller vessels.Author Summary: The architecture of vascular networks must balance complex demands to efficiently deliver oxygen and resources throughout the entire body. These demands constrain the possible forms of vasculature. Because of these constraints and the indispensable role of vasculature for much of life, scientists have sought to identify systematic patterns in the structural properties of vascular networks and whether these patterns can be predicted from models based on biological and physical principles. These studies have been limited by the lack of extensive, detailed data. Using high-quality vascular network data obtained via our software, Angicart, we identify novel, systematic patterns of asymmetry in sizes and branching angles among sibling vessels from mouse lung and human head and torso. To examine what constraints might underlie these patterns, we investigate several explanations, including various types of optimal branching as well as random branching. The optimal branchings were derived locally with respect to constraints on material costs or power loss. For random branching we allowed the degree of randomness to vary from local to global spatial scales. By comparing predictions with real data, our study suggests that a key component in determining vascular branching is material cost with some randomness at local to intermediate spatial scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Elif Tekin & David Hunt & Mitchell G Newberry & Van M Savage, 2016. "Do Vascular Networks Branch Optimally or Randomly across Spatial Scales?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005223
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005223
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005223&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitchell G Newberry & Daniel B Ennis & Van M Savage, 2015. "Testing Foundations of Biological Scaling Theory Using Automated Measurements of Vascular Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Tom Kolokotrones & Van Savage & Eric J. Deeds & Walter Fontana, 2010. "Curvature in metabolic scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7289), pages 753-756, April.
    3. Geoffrey B. West & James H. Brown & Brian J. Enquist, 1997. "A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology," Working Papers 97-03-019, Santa Fe Institute.
    4. Jayanth R. Banavar & Amos Maritan & Andrea Rinaldo, 1999. "Size and form in efficient transportation networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 399(6732), pages 130-132, May.
    5. Yuriy Mileyko & Herbert Edelsbrunner & Charles A Price & Joshua S Weitz, 2012. "Hierarchical Ordering of Reticular Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-9, June.
    6. Ross J. Metzger & Ophir D. Klein & Gail R. Martin & Mark A. Krasnow, 2008. "The branching programme of mouse lung development," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7196), pages 745-750, June.
    7. Geoffrey B. West & James H. Brown & Brian J. Enquist, 1999. "The Fourth Dimension of Life: Fractal Geometry and Allometric Scaling of Organisms," Working Papers 99-07-047, Santa Fe Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mitchell G Newberry & Daniel B Ennis & Van M Savage, 2015. "Testing Foundations of Biological Scaling Theory Using Automated Measurements of Vascular Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Witting, Lars, 2017. "The natural selection of metabolism and mass selects allometric transitions from prokaryotes to mammals," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 23-42.
    3. Elliott, Robert J.R. & Sun, Puyang & Xu, Qiqin, 2015. "Energy distribution and economic growth: An empirical test for China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 24-31.
    4. Dalgaard, Carl-Johan & Strulik, Holger, 2011. "Energy distribution and economic growth," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 782-797.
    5. Song, Dong-Ming & Jiang, Zhi-Qiang & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2009. "Statistical properties of world investment networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(12), pages 2450-2460.
    6. Liu, Chuang & Zhou, Wei-Xing & Yuan, Wei-Kang, 2010. "Statistical properties of visibility graph of energy dissipation rates in three-dimensional fully developed turbulence," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(13), pages 2675-2681.
    7. Jiang Zhang & Lingfei Wu, 2013. "Allometry and Dissipation of Ecological Flow Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-8, September.
    8. Dalgaard, Carl-Johan & Strulik, Holger, 2008. "Energy Distribution, Power Laws, and Economic Growth," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-385, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    9. Chen, Yanguang, 2014. "An allometric scaling relation based on logistic growth of cities," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 65-77.
    10. Wang, Cheng-Jun & Wu, Lingfei, 2016. "The scaling of attention networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 448(C), pages 196-204.
    11. He, Ji-Huan & Liu, Jun-Fang, 2009. "Allometric scaling laws in biology and physics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 1836-1838.
    12. Hennessy, David A., 2006. "Feeding and the Equilibrium Feeder Animal Price-Weight Schedule," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Lia Papadopoulos & Pablo Blinder & Henrik Ronellenfitsch & Florian Klimm & Eleni Katifori & David Kleinfeld & Danielle S Bassett, 2018. "Comparing two classes of biological distribution systems using network analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-31, September.
    14. Brolly, Matthew & Woodhouse, Iain H., 2012. "A “Matchstick Model” of microwave backscatter from a forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 237, pages 74-87.
    15. Rossana Mastrandrea & Rob ter Burg & Yuli Shan & Klaus Hubacek & Franco Ruzzenenti, 2022. "Scaling laws in global corporations as a benchmarking approach to assess environmental performance," Papers 2206.03148, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    16. Husmann, Kai & Möhring, Bernhard, 2017. "Modelling the economically viable wood in the crown of European beech trees," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 67-77.
    17. Xu, Meng & Jiang, Mengke & Wang, Hua-Feng, 2021. "Integrating metabolic scaling variation into the maximum entropy theory of ecology explains Taylor's law for individual metabolic rate in tropical forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    18. Michail Fragkias & José Lobo & Deborah Strumsky & Karen C Seto, 2013. "Does Size Matter? Scaling of CO2 Emissions and U.S. Urban Areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-8, June.
    19. He, Ji-Huan, 2006. "An allometric scaling law between gray matter and white matter of cerebral cortex," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 864-867.
    20. GANIO-MEGO, Joe, 2022. "The instant and historical Preston curves: allometry quarter-power law valid for the humans," SocArXiv y8rbt, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.