IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of Quorum Sensing as a Mechanism to Infer Kinship

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas Schluter
  • Armin P Schoech
  • Kevin R Foster
  • Sara Mitri

Abstract

Bacteria regulate many phenotypes via quorum sensing systems. Quorum sensing is typically thought to evolve because the regulated cooperative phenotypes are only beneficial at certain cell densities. However, quorum sensing systems are also threatened by non-cooperative “cheaters” that may exploit quorum-sensing regulated cooperation, which begs the question of how quorum sensing systems are maintained in nature. Here we study the evolution of quorum sensing using an individual-based model that captures the natural ecology and population structuring of microbial communities. We first recapitulate the two existing observations on quorum sensing evolution: density-dependent benefits favor quorum sensing but competition and cheating will destabilize it. We then model quorum sensing in a dense community like a biofilm, which reveals a novel benefit to quorum sensing that is intrinsically evolutionarily stable. In these communities, competing microbial genotypes gradually segregate over time leading to positive correlation between density and genetic similarity between neighboring cells (relatedness). This enables quorum sensing to track genetic relatedness and ensures that costly cooperative traits are only activated once a cell is safely surrounded by clonemates. We hypothesize that under similar natural conditions, the benefits of quorum sensing will not result from an assessment of density but from the ability to infer kinship.Author Summary: Bacteria secrete signal molecules into their environment and use these to regulate many of their key phenotypes. This is called quorum sensing and it is thought to evolve because it allows cells to sense their density. Here we propose a new function for quorum sensing that sheds light on its evolution. We develop a realistic model of a bacterial community and show that quorum sensing can function as a way to outcompete neighbors in patches occupied by many different genotypes. Growing aggressively at first makes quorm sensing genotypes a match for competitors. This strategy allows them to surround themselves with clonemates before reallocating resources to costly traits like cooperative secretions. This works because quorum sensing can act as a timer, which cells can use to infer how related they are to their neighbours and tune their investment into costly and exploitable cooperation based on the threat of competition from unrelated genotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas Schluter & Armin P Schoech & Kevin R Foster & Sara Mitri, 2016. "The Evolution of Quorum Sensing as a Mechanism to Infer Kinship," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004848
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004848
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004848&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen P. Diggle & Ashleigh S. Griffin & Genevieve S. Campbell & Stuart A. West, 2007. "Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7168), pages 411-414, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kerry E Boyle & Hilary Monaco & Dave van Ditmarsch & Maxime Deforet & Joao B Xavier, 2015. "Integration of Metabolic and Quorum Sensing Signals Governing the Decision to Cooperate in a Bacterial Social Trait," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Anne Mund & Christina Kuttler & Judith Pérez-Velázquez, 2019. "Using G -Functions to Investigate the Evolutionary Stability of Bacterial Quorum Sensing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Jorge M Pacheco & Vítor V Vasconcelos & Francisco C Santos & Brian Skyrms, 2015. "Co-evolutionary Dynamics of Collective Action with Signaling for a Quorum," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Eran Even-Tov & Shira Omer Bendori & Julie Valastyan & Xiaobo Ke & Shaul Pollak & Tasneem Bareia & Ishay Ben-Zion & Bonnie L Bassler & Avigdor Eldar, 2016. "Social Evolution Selects for Redundancy in Bacterial Quorum Sensing," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Li, Yixiao & Shen, Bin, 2013. "The coevolution of partner switching and strategy updating in non-excludable public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(20), pages 4956-4965.
    6. Elhanati, Yuval & Schuster, Stefan & Brenner, Naama, 2011. "Dynamic modeling of cooperative protein secretion in microorganism populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 49-63.
    7. Martin Schuster & Eric Foxall & David Finch & Hal Smith & Patrick De Leenheer, 2017. "Tragedy of the commons in the chemostat," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.