IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blind Predictions of DNA and RNA Tweezers Experiments with Force and Torque

Author

Listed:
  • Fang-Chieh Chou
  • Jan Lipfert
  • Rhiju Das

Abstract

Single-molecule tweezers measurements of double-stranded nucleic acids (dsDNA and dsRNA) provide unprecedented opportunities to dissect how these fundamental molecules respond to forces and torques analogous to those applied by topoisomerases, viral capsids, and other biological partners. However, tweezers data are still most commonly interpreted post facto in the framework of simple analytical models. Testing falsifiable predictions of state-of-the-art nucleic acid models would be more illuminating but has not been performed. Here we describe a blind challenge in which numerical predictions of nucleic acid mechanical properties were compared to experimental data obtained recently for dsRNA under applied force and torque. The predictions were enabled by the HelixMC package, first presented in this paper. HelixMC advances crystallography-derived base-pair level models (BPLMs) to simulate kilobase-length dsDNAs and dsRNAs under external forces and torques, including their global linking numbers. These calculations recovered the experimental bending persistence length of dsRNA within the error of the simulations and accurately predicted that dsRNA's “spring-like” conformation would give a two-fold decrease of stretch modulus relative to dsDNA. Further blind predictions of helix torsional properties, however, exposed inaccuracies in current BPLM theory, including three-fold discrepancies in torsional persistence length at the high force limit and the incorrect sign of dsRNA link-extension (twist-stretch) coupling. Beyond these experiments, HelixMC predicted that ‘nucleosome-excluding’ poly(A)/poly(T) is at least two-fold stiffer than random-sequence dsDNA in bending, stretching, and torsional behaviors; Z-DNA to be at least three-fold stiffer than random-sequence dsDNA, with a near-zero link-extension coupling; and non-negligible effects from base pair step correlations. We propose that experimentally testing these predictions should be powerful next steps for understanding the flexibility of dsDNA and dsRNA in sequence contexts and under mechanical stresses relevant to their biology.Author Summary: DNA and RNA are fundamental molecules in the central dogma of molecular biology. Many biological behaviors of double-stranded DNA and RNA – including transcription/translation by proteins and packaging into compact structures – depend on their ability to flex and twist. Single-molecule tweezers now provide accurate mechanical measurements of DNA and RNA helices under force and torque but have not been used to rigorously falsify and thereby advance computational models. Here we present the first such blind challenge, involving recent dsRNA tweezers data that were kept hidden from modelers and a new HelixMC toolkit that resolves challenges in simulating long double helices from base-pair level models. The predictions gave excellent agreement with bending and stretching measurements of dsRNA but failed to recover twisting properties, pinpointing a critical area of future investigation. HelixMC also predicted that poly(A)/poly(T) and Z-DNA–biologically important variants whose elastic responses have not been studied with tweezers–will have distinct mechanical properties. These results open a route to iteratively falsifying and refining computational models of long nucleic acid helices, as is necessary for attaining a predictive understanding of their biological behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang-Chieh Chou & Jan Lipfert & Rhiju Das, 2014. "Blind Predictions of DNA and RNA Tweezers Experiments with Force and Torque," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003756
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003756
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003756&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003756?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zev Bryant & Michael D. Stone & Jeff Gore & Steven B. Smith & Nicholas R. Cozzarelli & Carlos Bustamante, 2003. "Structural transitions and elasticity from torque measurements on DNA," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6946), pages 338-341, July.
    2. Jan Lipfert & Matthew Wiggin & Jacob W.J. Kerssemakers & Francesco Pedaci & Nynke H. Dekker, 2011. "Freely orbiting magnetic tweezers to directly monitor changes in the twist of nucleic acids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, September.
    3. Evgenia N. Nikolova & Eunae Kim & Abigail A. Wise & Patrick J. O’Brien & Ioan Andricioaei & Hashim M. Al-Hashimi, 2011. "Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA," Nature, Nature, vol. 470(7335), pages 498-502, February.
    4. Carlos Bustamante & Zev Bryant & Steven B. Smith, 2003. "Ten years of tension: single-molecule DNA mechanics," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6921), pages 423-427, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Korbinian Liebl & Martin Zacharias, 2020. "How global DNA unwinding causes non-uniform stress distribution and melting of DNA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Li Liu & Ying Fang & Qingsheng Huang & Jianhua Wu, 2011. "A Rigidity-Enhanced Antimicrobial Activity: A Case for Linear Cationic α-Helical Peptide HP(2–20) and Its Four Analogues," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, January.
    3. Ge Han & Yi Xue, 2022. "Rational design of hairpin RNA excited states reveals multi-step transitions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Pascal Carrivain & Maria Barbi & Jean-Marc Victor, 2014. "In Silico Single-Molecule Manipulation of DNA with Rigid Body Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Jack W. Shepherd & Sebastien Guilbaud & Zhaokun Zhou & Jamieson A. L. Howard & Matthew Burman & Charley Schaefer & Adam Kerrigan & Clare Steele-King & Agnes Noy & Mark C. Leake, 2024. "Correlating fluorescence microscopy, optical and magnetic tweezers to study single chiral biopolymers such as DNA," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Oi Kwan Wong & Martin Guthold & Dorothy A Erie & Jeff Gelles, 2008. "Interconvertible Lac Repressor–DNA Loops Revealed by Single-Molecule Experiments," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Young-Joo Kim & Do-Nyun Kim, 2016. "Structural Basis for Elastic Mechanical Properties of the DNA Double Helix," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, April.
    8. Camille Brème & François Heslot, 2013. "Mapping of Single-Base Differences between Two DNA Strands in a Single Molecule Using Holliday Junction Nanomechanics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
    9. Sangram Kadam & Kiran Kumari & Vinoth Manivannan & Shuvadip Dutta & Mithun K. Mitra & Ranjith Padinhateeri, 2023. "Predicting scale-dependent chromatin polymer properties from systematic coarse-graining," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.