IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Unifying Mechanistic Model of Selective Attention in Spiking Neurons

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce Bobier
  • Terrence C Stewart
  • Chris Eliasmith

Abstract

Visuospatial attention produces myriad effects on the activity and selectivity of cortical neurons. Spiking neuron models capable of reproducing a wide variety of these effects remain elusive. We present a model called the Attentional Routing Circuit (ARC) that provides a mechanistic description of selective attentional processing in cortex. The model is described mathematically and implemented at the level of individual spiking neurons, with the computations for performing selective attentional processing being mapped to specific neuron types and laminar circuitry. The model is used to simulate three studies of attention in macaque, and is shown to quantitatively match several observed forms of attentional modulation. Specifically, ARC demonstrates that with shifts of spatial attention, neurons may exhibit shifting and shrinking of receptive fields; increases in responses without changes in selectivity for non-spatial features (i.e. response gain), and; that the effect on contrast-response functions is better explained as a response-gain effect than as contrast-gain. Unlike past models, ARC embodies a single mechanism that unifies the above forms of attentional modulation, is consistent with a wide array of available data, and makes several specific and quantifiable predictions.Author Summary: At a given moment, a tremendous amount of visual information falls on the retinae, far more than the brain is capable of processing. By directing attention to a spatial location, stimuli at that position can be selectively processed, while irrelevant information from non-attended locations can be largely ignored. We present a detailed model that describes the mechanisms by which visual spatial attention may be implemented in the brain. Using this model, we simulated three previous studies of spatial attention in primates, and analysed the simulation data using the same methods as in the original experiments. Across these simulations, and without altering model parameters, our model produces results that are statistically indistinguishable from those recorded in primates. Unlike previous work, our model provides greater biological detail of how the brain performs selective visual processing, while also accurately demonstrating numerous forms of selective attention. Our results suggest that these seemingly different forms of attentional effects may result from a single mechanism for selectively processing attended stimuli.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce Bobier & Terrence C Stewart & Chris Eliasmith, 2014. "A Unifying Mechanistic Model of Selective Attention in Spiking Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003577
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003577
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003577&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Treue & Julio C. Martínez Trujillo, 1999. "Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 399(6736), pages 575-579, June.
    2. Pieter R. Roelfsema & Victor A. F. Lamme & Henk Spekreijse, 1998. "Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey," Nature, Nature, vol. 395(6700), pages 376-381, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Miconi & Rufin VanRullen, 2016. "A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Jacob A. Westerberg & Jeffrey D. Schall & Geoffrey F. Woodman & Alexander Maier, 2023. "Feedforward attentional selection in sensory cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Vladislav Kozyrev & Mohammad Reza Daliri & Philipp Schwedhelm & Stefan Treue, 2019. "Strategic deployment of feature-based attentional gain in primate visual cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Ritwik K Niyogi & KongFatt Wong-Lin, 2013. "Dynamic Excitatory and Inhibitory Gain Modulation Can Produce Flexible, Robust and Optimal Decision-making," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Robert G. Alexander & Stephen L. Macknik & Susana Martinez-Conde, 2022. "What the Neuroscience and Psychology of Magic Reveal about Misinformation," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Xaq Pitkow & Haim Sompolinsky & Markus Meister, 2007. "A Neural Computation for Visual Acuity in the Presence of Eye Movements," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Rong J. B. Zhu & Xue-Xin Wei, 2023. "Unsupervised approach to decomposing neural tuning variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Jeroen Brus & Joseph A. Heng & Valeriia Beliaeva & Fabian Gonzalez Pinto & Antonino Mario Cassarà & Esra Neufeld & Marcus Grueschow & Lukas Imbach & Rafael Polanía, 2024. "Causal phase-dependent control of non-spatial attention in human prefrontal cortex," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 743-757, April.
    9. Fengpei Hu & Changyong Jiao & Songpo Zhao & Huahua Dong & Xiao Liu & Yuji Yi & Jun Wang, 2015. "The Effects of Attention Pre-Allocation and Target-Background Integration on Object-Based Attention," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    10. George Loewenstein & Zachary Wojtowicz, 2023. "The Economics of Attention," CESifo Working Paper Series 10712, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.