IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/0030179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brightness and Darkness as Perceptual Dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Tony Vladusich
  • Marcel P Lucassen
  • Frans W Cornelissen

Abstract

A common-sense assumption concerning visual perception states that brightness and darkness cannot coexist at a given spatial location. One corollary of this assumption is that achromatic colors, or perceived grey shades, are contained in a one-dimensional (1-D) space varying from bright to dark. The results of many previous psychophysical studies suggest, by contrast, that achromatic colors are represented as points in a color space composed of two or more perceptual dimensions. The nature of these perceptual dimensions, however, presently remains unclear. Here we provide direct evidence that brightness and darkness form the dimensions of a two-dimensional (2-D) achromatic color space. This color space may play a role in the representation of object surfaces viewed against natural backgrounds, which simultaneously induce both brightness and darkness signals. Our 2-D model generalizes to the chromatic dimensions of color perception, indicating that redness and greenness (blueness and yellowness) also form perceptual dimensions. Collectively, these findings suggest that human color space is composed of six dimensions, rather than the conventional three.: Vision scientists have long adhered to the classic opponent-coding theory of vision, which states that bright–dark, red–green, and blue–yellow form mutually exclusive color pairs. According to this theory, it is not possible to see both brightness and darkness at a single spatial location, or an extended set of locations, such as a uniform surface. One corollary of this statement is that all perceivable grey shades vary along a continuum from bright to dark. At first glance, the notion that brightness and darkness cannot coexist on a single surface accords with our common-sense notion that a given grey shade cannot be simultaneously both brighter and darker than any other grey shade. The results presented here suggest that this common-sense notion is not supported by experimental data. Our results imply that a given grey shade can indeed be simultaneously brighter and darker than another grey shade. This seemingly paradoxical conclusion arises naturally if one assumes that brightness and darkness constitute the dimensions of a two-dimensional perceptual space in which points represent grey shades. Our results may encourage scientists working in related fields to question the assumption that perceptual variables, rather than sensory variables, are encoded in opponent pairs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tony Vladusich & Marcel P Lucassen & Frans W Cornelissen, 2007. "Brightness and Darkness as Perceptual Dimensions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0030179
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030179
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030179&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barton L. Anderson & Jonathan Winawer, 2005. "Image segmentation and lightness perception," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7029), pages 79-83, March.
    2. Isamu Motoyoshi & Shin'ya Nishida & Lavanya Sharan & Edward H. Adelson, 2007. "Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities," Nature, Nature, vol. 447(7141), pages 206-209, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isamu Motoyoshi, 2020. "Adaptive comparison matrix: An efficient method for psychological scaling of large stimulus sets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Masataka Sawayama & Shin'ya Nishida, 2018. "Material and shape perception based on two types of intensity gradient information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-40, April.
    3. Katherine R. Storrs & Barton L. Anderson & Roland W. Fleming, 2021. "Unsupervised learning predicts human perception and misperception of gloss," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(10), pages 1402-1417, October.
    4. Jun Liu & Junyu Dong & Xiaoxu Cai & Lin Qi & Mike Chantler, 2015. "Visual Perception of Procedural Textures: Identifying Perceptual Dimensions and Predicting Generation Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, June.
    5. János Geier & Mariann Hudák, 2011. "Changing the Chevreul Illusion by a Background Luminance Ramp: Lateral Inhibition Fails at Its Traditional Stronghold - A Psychophysical Refutation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-9, October.
    6. Eva Marckhgott & Bernadette Kamleitner, 2019. "Matte matters: when matte packaging increases perceptions of food naturalness," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 167-178, June.
    7. Filipp Schmidt & Roland W Fleming, 2018. "Identifying shape transformations from photographs of real objects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Hideyoshi Yanagisawa & Kenji Takatsuji, 2017. "Expectation effect of perceptual experience in sensory modality transitions: modeling with information theory," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(7), pages 1635-1644, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0030179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.