IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/0020168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Side-Chain Conformational Entropy of Proteins

Author

Listed:
  • Jinfeng Zhang
  • Jun S Liu

Abstract

The role of side-chain entropy (SCE) in protein folding has long been speculated about but is still not fully understood. Utilizing a newly developed Monte Carlo method, we conducted a systematic investigation of how the SCE relates to the size of the protein and how it differs among a protein's X-ray, NMR, and decoy structures. We estimated the SCE for a set of 675 nonhomologous proteins, and observed that there is a significant SCE for both exposed and buried residues for all these proteins—the contribution of buried residues approaches ∼40% of the overall SCE. Furthermore, the SCE can be quite different for structures with similar compactness or even similar conformations. As a striking example, we found that proteins' X-ray structures appear to pack more “cleverly” than their NMR or decoy counterparts in the sense of retaining higher SCE while achieving comparable compactness, which suggests that the SCE plays an important role in favouring native protein structures. By including a SCE term in a simple free energy function, we can significantly improve the discrimination of native protein structures from decoys.Synopsis: Side-chains of amino acids determine a protein's three-dimensional structure. The flexible nature of side-chains introduces a significant amount of conformational entropy associated with both protein folding and interactions. Despite many studies, the role that this side-chain entropy (SCE) plays in the process of folding and interactions has not been fully understood. Some basic questions about SCE have not been systematically studied. In this study, Zhang and Liu developed an efficient sequential Monte Carlo strategy to accurately estimate the SCE of proteins of arbitrary lengths with a given potential energy function. Using this novel tool, they studied how the SCE scales with the length of the protein, and how the SCE differs among a protein's X-ray, NMR, and decoy structures. They observed that X-ray structures pack more “smartly” than the corresponding decoy and NMR structures: with the same compactness, X-ray structures tend to have larger SCE. A combination of an SCE term with a contact potential energy significantly improved the discrimination between native and decoy structures. The implication of this study is that the SCE contributes so significantly to protein stability that it should be included explicitly in tasks such as structure prediction, protein design, and NMR structure refinement.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinfeng Zhang & Jun S Liu, 2006. "On Side-Chain Conformational Entropy of Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(12), pages 1-6, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020168
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020168
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020168&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen & Robert B. Best & Mark A. DePristo & Christopher M. Dobson & Michele Vendruscolo, 2005. "Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7022), pages 128-132, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy R Lezon & Ivet Bahar, 2010. "Using Entropy Maximization to Understand the Determinants of Structural Dynamics beyond Native Contact Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Gregory D Friedland & Nils-Alexander Lakomek & Christian Griesinger & Jens Meiler & Tanja Kortemme, 2009. "A Correspondence Between Solution-State Dynamics of an Individual Protein and the Sequence and Conformational Diversity of its Family," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Montserrat Barbany & Tim Meyer & Adam Hospital & Ignacio Faustino & Marco D'Abramo & Jordi Morata & Modesto Orozco & Xavier de la Cruz, 2015. "Molecular Dynamics Study of Naturally Existing Cavity Couplings in Proteins," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen & Paul Maragakis & Stefano Piana & Michael P Eastwood & Ron O Dror & David E Shaw, 2012. "Systematic Validation of Protein Force Fields against Experimental Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6, February.
    5. Matteo Tiberti & Elena Papaleo & Tone Bengtsen & Wouter Boomsma & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, 2015. "ENCORE: Software for Quantitative Ensemble Comparison," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Anders S Christensen & Troels E Linnet & Mikael Borg & Wouter Boomsma & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen & Thomas Hamelryck & Jan H Jensen, 2013. "Protein Structure Validation and Refinement Using Amide Proton Chemical Shifts Derived from Quantum Mechanics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.
    7. F. Emil Thomasen & Tórur Skaalum & Ashutosh Kumar & Sriraksha Srinivasan & Stefano Vanni & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, 2024. "Rescaling protein-protein interactions improves Martini 3 for flexible proteins in solution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Douglas L Theobald & Deborah S Wuttke, 2008. "Accurate Structural Correlations from Maximum Likelihood Superpositions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-8, February.
    9. Nimmi Das Anthuparambil & Anita Girelli & Sonja Timmermann & Marvin Kowalski & Mohammad Sayed Akhundzadeh & Sebastian Retzbach & Maximilian D. Senft & Michelle Dargasz & Dennis Gutmüller & Anusha Hire, 2023. "Exploring non-equilibrium processes and spatio-temporal scaling laws in heated egg yolk using coherent X-rays," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Dong Long & Rafael Brüschweiler, 2011. "In Silico Elucidation of the Recognition Dynamics of Ubiquitin," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-9, April.
    11. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen & Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg, 2009. "Similarity Measures for Protein Ensembles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Kai Wang & Shiyang Long & Pu Tian, 2015. "Hierarchical Conformational Analysis of Native Lysozyme Based on Sub-Millisecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Wouter Boomsma & Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, 2014. "Combining Experiments and Simulations Using the Maximum Entropy Principle," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.