IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/0020065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules

Author

Listed:
  • Bjoern Peters
  • Huynh-Hoa Bui
  • Sune Frankild
  • Morten Nielsen
  • Claus Lundegaard
  • Emrah Kostem
  • Derek Basch
  • Kasper Lamberth
  • Mikkel Harndahl
  • Ward Fleri
  • Stephen S Wilson
  • John Sidney
  • Ole Lund
  • Soren Buus
  • Alessandro Sette

Abstract

Recognition of peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules by T lymphocytes is an essential part of immune surveillance. Each MHC allele has a characteristic peptide binding preference, which can be captured in prediction algorithms, allowing for the rapid scan of entire pathogen proteomes for peptide likely to bind MHC. Here we make public a large set of 48,828 quantitative peptide-binding affinity measurements relating to 48 different mouse, human, macaque, and chimpanzee MHC class I alleles. We use this data to establish a set of benchmark predictions with one neural network method and two matrix-based prediction methods extensively utilized in our groups. In general, the neural network outperforms the matrix-based predictions mainly due to its ability to generalize even on a small amount of data. We also retrieved predictions from tools publicly available on the internet. While differences in the data used to generate these predictions hamper direct comparisons, we do conclude that tools based on combinatorial peptide libraries perform remarkably well. The transparent prediction evaluation on this dataset provides tool developers with a benchmark for comparison of newly developed prediction methods. In addition, to generate and evaluate our own prediction methods, we have established an easily extensible web-based prediction framework that allows automated side-by-side comparisons of prediction methods implemented by experts. This is an advance over the current practice of tool developers having to generate reference predictions themselves, which can lead to underestimating the performance of prediction methods they are not as familiar with as their own. The overall goal of this effort is to provide a transparent prediction evaluation allowing bioinformaticians to identify promising features of prediction methods and providing guidance to immunologists regarding the reliability of prediction tools.Synopsis: In higher organisms, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules are present on nearly all cell surfaces, where they present peptides to T lymphocytes of the immune system. The peptides are derived from proteins expressed inside the cell, and thereby allow the immune system to “peek inside” cells to detect infections or cancerous cells. Different MHC molecules exist, each with a distinct peptide binding specificity. Many algorithms have been developed that can predict which peptides bind to a given MHC molecule. These algorithms are used by immunologists to, for example, scan the proteome of a given virus for peptides likely to be presented on infected cells. In this paper, the authors provide a large-scale experimental dataset of quantitative MHC–peptide binding data. Using this dataset, they compare how well different approaches are able to identify binding peptides. This comparison identifies an artificial neural network as the most successful approach to peptide binding prediction currently available. This comparison serves as a benchmark for future tool development, allowing bioinformaticians to document advances in tool development as well as guiding immunologists to choose good prediction algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Bjoern Peters & Huynh-Hoa Bui & Sune Frankild & Morten Nielsen & Claus Lundegaard & Emrah Kostem & Derek Basch & Kasper Lamberth & Mikkel Harndahl & Ward Fleri & Stephen S Wilson & John Sidney & Ole L, 2006. "A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020065
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020065&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao Zhang & Peng Wang & Nikitas Papangelopoulos & Ying Xu & Alessandro Sette & Philip E Bourne & Ole Lund & Julia Ponomarenko & Morten Nielsen & Bjoern Peters, 2010. "Limitations of Ab Initio Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC Class II Molecules," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Peng Wang & John Sidney & Courtney Dow & Bianca Mothé & Alessandro Sette & Bjoern Peters, 2008. "A Systematic Assessment of MHC Class II Peptide Binding Predictions and Evaluation of a Consensus Approach," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Tomer Hertz & Hasan Ahmed & David P Friedrich & Danilo R Casimiro & Steven G Self & Lawrence Corey & M Juliana McElrath & Susan Buchbinder & Helen Horton & Nicole Frahm & Michael N Robertson & Barney , 2013. "HIV-1 Vaccine-Induced T-Cell Reponses Cluster in Epitope Hotspots that Differ from Those Induced in Natural Infection with HIV-1," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Aidan MacNamara & Ulrich Kadolsky & Charles R M Bangham & Becca Asquith, 2009. "T-Cell Epitope Prediction: Rescaling Can Mask Biological Variation between MHC Molecules," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-7, March.
    5. Morten Nielsen & Claus Lundegaard & Thomas Blicher & Bjoern Peters & Alessandro Sette & Sune Justesen & Søren Buus & Ole Lund, 2008. "Quantitative Predictions of Peptide Binding to Any HLA-DR Molecule of Known Sequence: NetMHCIIpan," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-10, July.
    6. Sinu Paul & Nathan P Croft & Anthony W Purcell & David C Tscharke & Alessandro Sette & Morten Nielsen & Bjoern Peters, 2020. "Benchmarking predictions of MHC class I restricted T cell epitopes in a comprehensively studied model system," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Massimo Andreatta & Claus Schafer-Nielsen & Ole Lund & Søren Buus & Morten Nielsen, 2011. "NNAlign: A Web-Based Prediction Method Allowing Non-Expert End-User Discovery of Sequence Motifs in Quantitative Peptide Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-11, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.