IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3001566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of apathy and compulsivity on planning and stopping in sequential decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline Scholl
  • Hailey A Trier
  • Matthew F S Rushworth
  • Nils Kolling

Abstract

Real-life decision-making often comprises sequences of successive decisions about whether to take opportunities as they are encountered or keep searching for better ones instead. We investigated individual differences related to such sequential decision-making and link them especially to apathy and compulsivity in a large online sample (discovery sample: n = 449 and confirmation sample: n = 756). Our cognitive model revealed distinct changes in the way participants evaluated their environments and planned their own future behaviour. Apathy was linked to decision inertia, i.e., automatically persisting with a sequence of searches for longer than appropriate given the value of searching. Thus, despite being less motivated, they did not avoid the effort associated with longer searches. In contrast, compulsivity was linked to self-reported insensitivity to the cost of continuing with a sequence of searches. The objective measures of behavioural cost insensitivity were clearly linked to compulsivity only in the discovery sample. While the confirmation sample showed a similar effect, it did not reach significance. Nevertheless, in both samples, participants reported awareness of such bias (experienced as “overchasing”). In addition, this awareness made them report preemptively avoiding situations related to the bias. However, we found no evidence of them actually preempting more in the task, which might mean a misalignment of their metacognitive beliefs or that our behavioural measures were incomplete. In summary, individual variation in distinct, fundamental aspects of sequential decision-making can be linked to variation in 2 measures of behavioural traits associated with psychological illness in the normal population.This preregistered study investigated individual differences in a sequential decision making task. The cognitive model revealed distinct differences in the way participants evaluated their environments and planned their own future behaviour connected to clinical dimensions; apathy was linked to decision inertia and compulsivity to perceived insensitivity to the cost of continuing with a sequence of searches, but also attempts of pre-emptive avoidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline Scholl & Hailey A Trier & Matthew F S Rushworth & Nils Kolling, 2022. "The effect of apathy and compulsivity on planning and stopping in sequential decision-making," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-38, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001566
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001566
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001566&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001566?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John M McNamara & Pete C Trimmer, 2019. "Sequential choices using signal detection theory can reverse classical predictions," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 16-19.
    2. Christoph W. Korn & Dominik R. Bach, 2019. "Minimizing threat via heuristic and optimal policies recruits hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 733-745, July.
    3. Christoph W Korn & Dominik R Bach, 2015. "Maintaining Homeostasis by Decision-Making," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Christoph W. Korn & Dominik R. Bach, 2018. "Heuristic and optimal policy computations in the human brain during sequential decision-making," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koen M. M. Frolichs & Gabriela Rosenblau & Christoph W. Korn, 2022. "Incorporating social knowledge structures into computational models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Eleanor Holton & Jan Grohn & Harry Ward & Sanjay G. Manohar & Jill X. O’Reilly & Nils Kolling, 2024. "Goal commitment is supported by vmPFC through selective attention," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 1351-1365, July.
    3. Florian Ott & Dimitrije Marković & Alexander Strobel & Stefan J Kiebel, 2020. "Dynamic integration of forward planning and heuristic preferences during multiple goal pursuit," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Longbing Cao & Chengzhang Zhu, 2022. "Personalized next-best action recommendation with multi-party interaction learning for automated decision-making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.