IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pje/journl/article29sumv.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Analysis Of Regional Bilateral Trade Between Pakistan And Central Asian Republics

Author

Listed:
  • Saleem KHAN*
  • Sher ALI**
  • Saima UROOGE**

Abstract

This research examines the intensity, magnitude and direction of trade bilaterally between Pakistan and Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan (the CARs) in1995-2017. The analysis uses indices of export-import intensity and trade complementarity. The results of study show that Pakistan is a valuable trading partner to the region and on average experience greater export intensity rather than import intensity, depicting the fact that Pakistan has enjoyed intensity in overall trade and was relatively more specialized rather than CARs during the period of this analysis. Pakistan mainly exported cereals, oil and pharmaceutical products while imported cotton, iron and steel etc. The greater value of complementarity index indicates that Pakistan has exported most of these products to the countries which have high demand. The findings of intense trade relation between Pakistan and CARs suggest that Pakistan has an opportunity to exploit its resources, diversify exports and increase its trade relations with the region by signing free trade agreements.

Suggested Citation

  • Saleem KHAN* & Sher ALI** & Saima UROOGE**, 2019. "The Analysis Of Regional Bilateral Trade Between Pakistan And Central Asian Republics," Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, Applied Economics Research Centre, vol. 29(1), pages 93-106.
    • Handle: RePEc:pje:journl:article29sumv
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.aerc.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Paper-940-SALEEM-KHAN-V-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kojima, Kiyoshi, 1964. "The Pattern of International Trade Among Advanced Countries," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 5(1), pages 16-36, June.
    2. Richard Pomfret, 1997. "The economic cooperation organization: Current status and future prospects," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 657-667.
    3. Kathleen Collins, 2009. "Economic and Security Regionalism among Patrimonial Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of Central Asia," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(2), pages 249-281.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ibrahim Niftiyev, 2024. "Analyzing Bilateral Trade Dynamics between Azerbaijan and Pakistan: A Robust Least Squares Regression Approach," Journal of Economic Analysis, Anser Press, vol. 3(4), pages 250-275, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Liu & Xiaohua Tang & Cuiming Zhao & Zifan Shen & Ru Li & Jiangang Yu, 2024. "Research on the International Competitiveness and Sustainable Trade Development of the Key Equipment and Components of China’s High-Speed Rail," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Koopmann, Georg & Vogel, Lars, 2011. "Globalisierung, Regionalisierung und die Handelspolitik der Europäischen Union," HWWI Policy Papers 58, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    3. Pradyut Guha & Rangalal Mohapatra, 2016. "Intensity and Pattern of Border Trade in India’s Northeast," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 51(3), pages 248-265, August.
    4. Tiken Das & Pradyut Guha, 2022. "Indo‐ASEAN Trade Complementarity and Favourability with Transition from Look East to Act East Policy: Evidence from Northeastern States of India," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 215-243, April.
    5. Céline Carrère & Julien Gourdon & Marcelo Olarreaga, 2012. "Regional Integration and Natural Resources: who benefits? Evidence from MENA," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 131, pages 23-41.
    6. Lucian Dumitrescu, 2021. "Writing “Eastness†: Romania and the Conundrum of Regionness in the Black Sea Area," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    7. Wajid Islam & Junaid Ahmed & Amjad Masood, 2022. "Unlocking Markets: Assessing Pakistan’s Trade Potential with Gulf Cooperation Council Members," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 21-38, July-Dec.
    8. Donald R. Davis & David E. Weinstein, 2002. "What Role for Empirics in International Trade?," Aussenwirtschaft, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economics Research, vol. 57(04), pages 441-468, December.
    9. Lee, Seung Oh & Jung, Younghun, 2018. "Efficiency of water use and its implications for a water-food nexus in the Aral Sea Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 80-90.
    10. Amita Batra, 2010. "Asian Economic Integration ASEAN+3+1 or ASEAN+1s?," Working Papers id:2734, eSocialSciences.
    11. Prakash Chandra Adhikary & Md. Sirazuddin Biswas, 1991. "Potential Gains to Bangladesh for Imports of Selected Commodities from India and Pakistan: An Analytic Investigation," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 47(4), pages 63-82, July.
    12. Maria Crescimanno & Domenico Farruggia & Antonino Galati & Dario Siggia, 2013. "Intensit? degli scambi agroalimentari tra i Paesi del bacino del Mediterraneo," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 15(1), pages 13-35.
    13. Carton, Christine & Slim, Sadri, 2018. "Trade misinvoicing in OECD countries: what can we learn from bilateral trade intensity indices?," MPRA Paper 85703, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. repec:kap:iaecre:v:14:y:2008:i:4:p:355-368 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Sayeeda Bano, 2014. "Trade Relations between New Zealand and China: An Empirical Analysis in the Context of a Free Trade Agreement," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 4, pages 75-92, November.
    16. Amita Batra, 2006. "Asian Economic Integration: ASEAN+3+1 or ASEAN+1s?," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 186, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    17. Viet HOANG, 2018. "Assessing the agricultural trade complementarity of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(10), pages 464-475.
    18. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:22-59 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. de Frutos, Pablo, 2020. "Changes in world patterns of wild edible mushrooms use measured through international trade flows," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Widodo, Tri, 2009. "Modified Grubel-Lloyd Index: Intra-industry Trade and Intra-regional Trade in East Asia," MPRA Paper 77992, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Mary Lovely & Douglas Nelson, 2002. "Intra-industry trade as an indicator of labor market adjustment," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 138(2), pages 179-206, June.
    22. Setyastuti, Rini & Adiningsih, Sri & Widodo, Tri, 2018. "ASEAN Economic Community: Theoretical versus Practical Economic Integration," MPRA Paper 86919, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pje:journl:article29sumv. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Samina Khalil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aekarpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.