IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6867-d1453599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the International Competitiveness and Sustainable Trade Development of the Key Equipment and Components of China’s High-Speed Rail

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Liu

    (School of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Xiaohua Tang

    (School of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Cuiming Zhao

    (School of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Zifan Shen

    (School of Business, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Ru Li

    (School of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Jiangang Yu

    (School of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

Abstract

The high-speed rail industry (from now on referred to as HSR) in China is flourishing, and improvements in its international competitiveness and the sustainable development of trade are gradually attracting international attention. This study examined data related to trade between major countries producing and importing key HSR equipment and components from 2013 to 2022. The International Competitiveness Index, Trade Complementarity Index, and Trade Integration Index were used to study the international competitiveness of the key equipment and components of China’s HSR, as well as the bilateral trade complementarity between China and other HSR powers. It also studied the degree of bilateral trade integration between China and these HSR powers, as well as that between China and the “Belt and Road” countries. Then, the ARIMA model was established by using Python 3.9.5 software to predict the degree of trade integration between China and the above countries from 2023 to 2027. The results show the following: (1) Some of the key equipment and components of China’s HSR have international competitiveness, but some have shortcomings. (2) China and HSR powers have both trade competition and trade complementarity in the field of key equipment and components. (3) The trade integration of key HSR equipment and components between China and countries along the “Belt and Road” is high. Overall, after ten years of development, China’s HSR industry had improved by 2022. The HSR market in the “Belt and Road” countries is the market that China’s HSR industry must focus on for sustainable development in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Liu & Xiaohua Tang & Cuiming Zhao & Zifan Shen & Ru Li & Jiangang Yu, 2024. "Research on the International Competitiveness and Sustainable Trade Development of the Key Equipment and Components of China’s High-Speed Rail," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6867-:d:1453599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6867/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6867/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandra Parteka & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2013. "The Impact of Trade Integration with the European Union on Productivity in a Posttransition Economy: The Case of Polish Manufacturing Sectors," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 84-104, March.
    2. Jiyong Chen & Dabo Chen & Aiping Yao, 2020. "Trade development between China and countries along the Belt and Road: A spatial econometric analysis based on trade competitiveness and complementarity," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 205-227, May.
    3. Shen, Zhiyang & Zhao, Yuntian & Guneri, Fatma & Yang, Yiping & Wang, Songkai & Deng, Haiyan, 2023. "Does the rise of China promote the sustainable development of OECD countries? A geopolitical perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    4. Arindam Das, 2023. "The Relationship between International Trade in Industry 4.0 Products and National-Level Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:788 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Kojima, Kiyoshi, 1964. "The Pattern of International Trade Among Advanced Countries," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 5(1), pages 16-36, June.
    7. Xiaosong Zheng & Lijun Jia & Jiawen Bao & Jiao Chen, 2018. "A Study of Trade Complementarity between China and the Baltic States and its Development Strategies," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 788-788, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Parteka & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2013. "The Impact of Trade Integration with the European Union on Productivity in a Posttransition Economy: The Case of Polish Manufacturing Sectors," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 84-104, March.
    2. Koopmann, Georg & Vogel, Lars, 2011. "Globalisierung, Regionalisierung und die Handelspolitik der Europäischen Union," HWWI Policy Papers 58, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    3. Pradyut Guha & Rangalal Mohapatra, 2016. "Intensity and Pattern of Border Trade in India’s Northeast," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 51(3), pages 248-265, August.
    4. Aleksandra Parteka & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2015. "Integrated sectors - diversified earnings: the (missing) impact of offshoring on wages and wage convergence in the EU27," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 13(3), pages 325-350, September.
    5. Tiken Das & Pradyut Guha, 2022. "Indo‐ASEAN Trade Complementarity and Favourability with Transition from Look East to Act East Policy: Evidence from Northeastern States of India," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 215-243, April.
    6. Wajid Islam & Junaid Ahmed & Amjad Masood, 2022. "Unlocking Markets: Assessing Pakistan’s Trade Potential with Gulf Cooperation Council Members," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 21-38, July-Dec.
    7. Donald R. Davis & David E. Weinstein, 2002. "What Role for Empirics in International Trade?," Aussenwirtschaft, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economics Research, vol. 57(04), pages 441-468, December.
    8. Wang, Hui & Si, Ieongcheng & Chen, Zhihua, 2024. "Does the Belt and Road Initiative promote China and the countries along the route to reconstruct the global value chain? Evidence from value-added trade," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 63-83.
    9. Amita Batra, 2010. "Asian Economic Integration ASEAN+3+1 or ASEAN+1s?," Working Papers id:2734, eSocialSciences.
    10. Julan Du & Gaoju Yang & Hugh Dang, 2020. "Special issue on foreign trade and investment in China’s continuing economic opening and the Belt and Road Initiative," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 121-126, May.
    11. Prakash Chandra Adhikary & Md. Sirazuddin Biswas, 1991. "Potential Gains to Bangladesh for Imports of Selected Commodities from India and Pakistan: An Analytic Investigation," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 47(4), pages 63-82, July.
    12. Maria Crescimanno & Domenico Farruggia & Antonino Galati & Dario Siggia, 2013. "Intensit? degli scambi agroalimentari tra i Paesi del bacino del Mediterraneo," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 15(1), pages 13-35.
    13. Carton, Christine & Slim, Sadri, 2018. "Trade misinvoicing in OECD countries: what can we learn from bilateral trade intensity indices?," MPRA Paper 85703, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. repec:kap:iaecre:v:14:y:2008:i:4:p:355-368 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Sayeeda Bano, 2014. "Trade Relations between New Zealand and China: An Empirical Analysis in the Context of a Free Trade Agreement," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 4, pages 75-92, November.
    16. Amita Batra, 2006. "Asian Economic Integration: ASEAN+3+1 or ASEAN+1s?," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 186, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    17. Viet HOANG, 2018. "Assessing the agricultural trade complementarity of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(10), pages 464-475.
    18. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:22-59 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. de Frutos, Pablo, 2020. "Changes in world patterns of wild edible mushrooms use measured through international trade flows," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Widodo, Tri, 2009. "Modified Grubel-Lloyd Index: Intra-industry Trade and Intra-regional Trade in East Asia," MPRA Paper 77992, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Mary Lovely & Douglas Nelson, 2002. "Intra-industry trade as an indicator of labor market adjustment," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 138(2), pages 179-206, June.
    22. Setyastuti, Rini & Adiningsih, Sri & Widodo, Tri, 2018. "ASEAN Economic Community: Theoretical versus Practical Economic Integration," MPRA Paper 86919, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6867-:d:1453599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.