IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v36y1997i2p171-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Livestock Economy of Pakistan: An Agricultural Sector Model Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad A. Quddus

    (Pakistan Agricultural Research Council.)

  • Stephen P. Davies

    (Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.)

  • Donald W. Lybecker

    (Pakistan Agricultural Research Council.)

Abstract

The Pakistan Agricultural Sector Model (PASM) developed by Davies et al. (1991) was modified to enhance the livestock sub-sector. Nutrient-based rations replaced feedstuff-based rations and dry matter minimum and maximum constraints (stomach capacity) were added. Several initial simulations were undertaken to examine the structure of the modified model and its impact across the crop and livestock sub-sectors. These simulations included relaxing exogenous livestock numbers and selected crop hectarage constraints, and requiring that green forage be fed in the season grown. Most importantly, the results demonstrated that fodder hectarage will grow with livestock numbers to insure that sufficient green forage is available seasonally. Two other analyses were performed to demonstrate the need to specify linkages between the crop and livestock sub-sectors. An analysis of transforming the livestock sub-sector from traditional to feedlot-based technology demonstrated that the reduced numbers of non-milking cattle needed for a given output of meat would provide the potential for increased production of various crops and other livestock products. Also, expanded cotton and Irri rice exports, hypothesised to occur through trade liberalisation from the Uruguay Round of the GATT, highlighted other inter-relationships between the crop and livestock sub-sectors. Greater production of both livestock and other crops might accompany the expansion of cotton production but less livestock feed would be available with expanded exports of Irri rice.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad A. Quddus & Stephen P. Davies & Donald W. Lybecker, 1997. "The Livestock Economy of Pakistan: An Agricultural Sector Model Approach," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 171-190.
  • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:36:y:1997:i:2:p:171-190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/1997/Volume2/171-190.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. M. Adams & S. A. Hamilton & B. A. McCarl, 1986. "The Benefits of Pollution Control: The Case of Ozone and U.S. Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(4), pages 886-893.
    2. Muhammad Akmal, 1993. "A Dynamic Model of Milk Production Response for Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 873-884.
    3. Keith H. Coble & Ching-Cheng Chang & Bruce A. McCarl & Bobby R. Eddleman, 1992. "Assessing Economic Implications of New Technology: The Case of Cornstarch-Based Biodegradable Plastic," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 33-43.
    4. T. Takayama & G. G. Judge, 1964. "Spatial Equilibrium and Quadratic Programming," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 46(1), pages 67-93.
    5. Rashid Faruqee & Kevin Carey, 1995. "Reforming the Government's Role in Pakistan's Agriculture Sector," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 34(3), pages 225-262.
    6. John H. Duloy & Roger D. Norton, 1975. "Prices and Incomes in Linear Programming Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(4), pages 591-600.
    7. Jeffrey Apland & Hans Andersson, 1996. "Optimal Location of Processing Plants: Sector Modeling Considerations and an Example," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 18(3), pages 491-504.
    8. Ender, Gary, 1990. "Government Intervention in Pakistan's Agricultural Economy," Staff Reports 278318, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Mark W. Rosegrant & Robert E. Evenson, 1993. "Agricultural Productivity Growth in Pakistan and India: A Comparative Analysis," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 433-451.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shujaat Farooq & Durr-e-Nayab & Saddam Hussein & Nabila Kunwal, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Range Resource Management In Pakistan," PIDE Knowledge Brief 2024:113, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    2. Rizwan Shabbir, 2014. "Institutional Development and Sustainable Growth for Livestock Sector in Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 2(10), pages 394-404, October.
    3. Arifullah, Shahnaz A. & Önal, Hayri & Chishti, Anwar F., 2010. "Effects of technological progress on consumers’ and producers’ welfare: a case study for Pakistan Punjab," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 49(3), pages 1-13.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McDowell, Howard & Fleming, Ann M. & Fallert, Richard F., 1988. "Federal Milk Marketing Orders: An Analysis of Alternative Policies," Agricultural Economic Reports 308061, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Rizwan Shabbir, 2014. "Institutional Development and Sustainable Growth for Livestock Sector in Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 2(10), pages 394-404, October.
    3. Chih-Chun KUNG, 2018. "A dynamic framework of sustainable development in agriculture and bioenergy," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(10), pages 445-455.
    4. Migdalas, A. & Baourakis, G. & Kalogeras, N. & Meriem, H. B., 2004. "Sector modeling for the prediction and evaluation of Cretan olive oil," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 454-464, January.
    5. Chih-Chun Kung & Meng-Shiuh Chang, 2015. "Effect of Agricultural Feedstock to Energy Conversion Rate on Bioenergy and GHG Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Miguel Riviere & Sylvain Caurla, 2020. "Representations of the Forest Sector in Economic Models [Les représentations du secteur forestier dans les modèles économiques]," Post-Print hal-03088084, HAL.
    7. Boggess, William Glenn, 1979. "Development and application of an interregional separable programming model of United States agriculture in 1985," ISU General Staff Papers 197901010800008192, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Unknown, 1985. "Proceeding of a Seminar Sponsored by Northcentral Regional Project NC-176, Northeastern Regional Project NE-153 Southern Regional Project S-166 "Dairy Modeling in the 1980's: A Symposium on Curre," Economics and Sociology Occasional Papers - ESO Series 243216, Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics.
    9. Munir Ahmad, 2003. "Agricultural Productivity, Efficiency, and Rural Poverty in Irrigated Pakistan: A Stochastic Production FrontiermAnalysis," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 42(3), pages 219-248.
    10. Hof, John G. & Loomis, John B., 1983. "A Recreation Optimization Model Based On The Travel Cost Method," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(01), pages 1-10, July.
    11. Camacho, Carmen & Pérez-Barahona, Agustín, 2015. "Land use dynamics and the environment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 96-118.
    12. Koo, Won W. & Taylor, Richard D. & Karemera, David, 1992. "Determinants of Red Meat Trade Flows," Agricultural Economics Reports 23448, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    13. Johansson, Robert & Peters, Mark & House, Robert, 2007. "Regional Environment and Agriculture Programming Model," Technical Bulletins 184314, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Yates, C.M. & Rehman, Tahir, 2002. "Development of a Partial Equilibrium Model of the EU Agriculture using Positivistic Mathematical Programming," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24878, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Goletti, Francesco & Minot, Nicholas, 2000. "Rice market liberalization and poverty in Viet Nam:," Research reports 114, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    16. Houston, Jack E. & Whittlesey, Norman K., 1984. "Water Conservation Opportunities In Pacific Northwest Irrigated Agriculture: A Water Rights Market Approach," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 279048, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Kung, Chih-Chun & Cao, Xiaoyong & Choi, Yongrok & Kung, Shan-Shan, 2019. "A stochastic analysis of cropland utilization and resource allocation under climate change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Liao, Chao-ning & Önal, Hayri & Chen, Ming-Hsiang, 2009. "Average shadow price and equilibrium price: A case study of tradable pollution permit markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1207-1213, August.
    19. Siwa Msangi & Richard E. Howitt, 2007. "Income distributional effects of using market‐based instruments for managing common property resources," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 37(s1), pages 249-259, December.
    20. Pannell, David J., 1988. "Modelling Risk in Linear Programming Using Direct Solution of Linearly Segmented Approximations of the Utility Function," Discussion Papers 315423, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:36:y:1997:i:2:p:171-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.