IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v35y1996i4p773-786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Macroeconomic Policies and Management of Debt, Deficit, and Inflation in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Aslam Chaudhary

    (Department of Economics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.)

  • Shahid Waseem Anjum

    (Department of Economics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.)

Abstract

The study attempts to analyse the sustainability of fiscal policy in Pakistan. Alternative foreign debt and domestic debt strategies were analysed for formulating meaningful policy guidelines. Such analysis was made consistent with other macro-economic variables like growth of GNP, inflation, and interest rates on debt. Alongwith the identifications of sustainable deficit, required deficit reduction in the actual fiscal deficit under appropriate assumptions was also estimated for three time periods: the 1980s, 1985–95 (recent past), and 1993–98 (the 8th plan period). The averages of the sustainable deficits for the above- cited periods under alterantive scenarios were estimated by utilising a sustainable deficit model for Pakistan. Our empirical findings indicate that Pakistan has been following such macro-economic policies pertaining to fiscal deficit as are not consistent with sustainable deficit. For instance, during the 1980s, deficit of about 4.2 percent of GNP was sustainable against the actual fiscal deficit of 6.5 percent. During the recent past, sustainable deficit was about 5.4 percent of GNP against the actual deficit of 7.4 percent. It was planned that during 1993–98, fiscal deficit will be restricted to 5.5 percent of GNP and GNP growth was expected 7 percent per annum. However, during the first three years of the 8th plan, GNP growth was only 3.6 percent per annum. Our estimates indicated that sustainable fiscal deficit was only 2.7 percent of GNP for this period, given the above actual growth of the economy. The above discussion provides important information regarding unsustainability of fiscal deficit in Pakistan. Throughout the period under analysis, fiscal deficit was not sustainable. As a result, negative impacts of fiscal deficit on the economy were bound to emerge. Our findings regarding sustainability of fiscal deficit have important bearing on macroeconomic policies. Inflation, unemployment, increasing burden of debt and debt-servicing are linked with fiscal deficit. Thus, there is a need to keep the fiscal deficit within a limit; consistent with other macro-economic variables like inflation and debt, etc. Doing so may help to stabilise the economy and to solve the related economic problems. In brief, fiscal deficit need to be reduced for sustainability of the fiscal system and for stable economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Aslam Chaudhary & Shahid Waseem Anjum, 1996. "Macroeconomic Policies and Management of Debt, Deficit, and Inflation in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 773-786.
  • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:35:y:1996:i:4:p:773-786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/1996/Volume4/773-786.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. International Monetary Fund, 1992. "Fiscal Policy in Pakistan Since 1970," IMF Working Papers 1992/097, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Eisner, Robert, 1984. "Which Budget Deficit? Some Issues of Measurement and Their Implications," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(2), pages 138-143, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nawaz, Muhammad & Iqbal, Muhammad Mazhar & Ali, Amanat & Zaman, Khalid, 2012. "Fiscal Theory of Price Level: A Panel Data Analysis for selected Saarc Countries," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 152-170, September.
    2. Ejaz, Khurram & Javid, Attiya Yasmin, 2011. "An assessment of debt sustainability in scenario of Pakistan’s debt burden," MPRA Paper 37563, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Mehmet Behzat Ekinci, 2016. "External Borrowing and Inflation in Turkey Between 2003 and 2015: A Simple Linear Regression Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(1), pages 45-54.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy C. Irwin, 2015. "Defining The Government'S Debt And Deficit," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 711-732, September.
    2. Easterly, William, 1999. "When is fiscal adjustment an illusion?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2109, The World Bank.
    3. J.V.D.S. Heyns, 1992. "Budgetary Reform: A Capital Budget?," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 60(4), pages 210-220, December.
    4. Chang, Tsangyao & Chiang, Gengnan, 2011. "Regime-switching effects of debt on real GDP per capita the case of Latin American and Caribbean countries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2404-2408.
    5. Jérôme Creel & Henri Sterdyniak, 1995. "Les déficits publics en Europe," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03458224, HAL.
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2965 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Raghbendra Jha, 2004. "Macroeconomic stabilization and pro-poor budgetary policy in the globalized economy," CAMA Working Papers 2004-08, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    8. V. Bárta, 1996. "Estimation of the Fiscal Stance in the Czech Republic during Transformation: Full Employment Budget Analysis," CERT Discussion Papers 9612, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University.
    9. Marius Dinca & Gheorghita Dinca, 2010. "A Comparative Analysis of the Greek and Romanian Public Finances: 2000-2008," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 23-44.
    10. Chang, Tsangyao & Chiang, Gengnan, 2012. "Transitional Behavior of Government Debt Ratio on Growth: The Case of OECD Countries," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 24-37, June.
    11. Jérôme Creel & Henri Sterdyniak, 1995. "Les déficits publics en Europe : causes, conséquences ou remèdes à la crise ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 54(1), pages 57-100.
    12. David J. Smyth & Yu Hsing, 1995. "In Search Of An Optimal Debt Ratio For Economic Growth," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 13(4), pages 51-59, October.
    13. Ramona Mariana Calinica, 2019. "Causes, Consequences and Ways of Financing the Budget Deficit," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 506-509.
    14. Per Gunnar Berglund, 2001. "Equality and Enterprise: Can Functional Finance Offer a New Historical Compromise?," SCEPA working paper series. 2001-01, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    15. Tan, Eu Chye, 2006. "Fiscal Deficits, Inflation and Economic Growth in a Successful Open Developing Economy," Review of Applied Economics, Lincoln University, Department of Financial and Business Systems, vol. 2(1), pages 1-11.
    16. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2965 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Chirculescu Maria Felicia & Ciurlau Loredana, 2014. "Romania'S Public Debt And General Framework Fiscal-Budgetary Policy," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 123-128, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:35:y:1996:i:4:p:773-786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.