IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v9y2022i1d10.1057_s41599-022-01175-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using network analyses to examine the extent to which and in what ways psychology is multidisciplinary

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshiaki Fujita

    (University of Kansas)

  • Michael S. Vitevitch

    (University of Kansas)

Abstract

The emerging field known as the “science of science” uses a variety of quantitative techniques to (among other things) understand how a specific field changes over time. The tools of network science were used to quantify the extent to which Psychology is multidisciplinary, and how the extent to which it is multidisciplinary changed over time. Citation networks were created from all of the articles published in journals identified by the Web of Science as Multidisciplinary-Psychology for each year from 2008 to 2018. Nodes in the networks represented Multidisciplinary-Psychology journals, and connections were placed to other journals (i.e., nodes) that were cited in the Multidisciplinary-Psychology articles for each year. The citation networks showed that about 25% of the citations were to other Multidisciplinary-Psychology journals, about 50% of the citations were to Psychology journals in other sub-fields, and about 25% of the citations were to journals in other disciplines. This distribution of citations remained fairly consistent across the years examined. To identify the ways in which Psychology is multidisciplinary, clusters of nodes (known as modules) in each citation network were detected to identify possible research themes that were examined further with co-word networks made from the author-provided keywords in each of the Multidisciplinary-Psychology articles that appeared in each Module. Some research topics persisted in the years examined, whereas other topics were more transient. Given that multidisciplinary research did not increase over time but instead changed in areas of research focus, ways for academic and research administrators to foster and continually renew multidisciplinary research are discussed. The discussion also describes how individual researchers might use the techniques here to identify areas of research that are less commonly explored and may prove to be fruitful areas to shift their research focus. The same techniques can be used to provide insight in to other disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshiaki Fujita & Michael S. Vitevitch, 2022. "Using network analyses to examine the extent to which and in what ways psychology is multidisciplinary," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01175-8
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-022-01175-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-022-01175-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-022-01175-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tommy Gärling & Amelie Gamble & Filip Fors & Mikael Hjerm, 2016. "Emotional Well-Being Related to Time Pressure, Impediment to Goal Progress, and Stress-Related Symptoms," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1789-1799, October.
    2. Ebadi, Ashkan & Schiffauerova, Andrea, 2015. "How to become an important player in scientific collaboration networks?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 809-825.
    3. S. Ravikumar & Ashutosh Agrahari & S. N. Singh, 2015. "Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005–2010)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 929-955, January.
    4. Jon M. Kleinberg, 2000. "Navigation in a small world," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6798), pages 845-845, August.
    5. Cynthia S. Q. Siew & Dirk U. Wulff & Nicole M. Beckage & Yoed N. Kenett, 2019. "Cognitive Network Science: A Review of Research on Cognition through the Lens of Network Representations, Processes, and Dynamics," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-24, June.
    6. Kevin W. Boyack & Richard Klavans & Katy Börner, 2005. "Mapping the backbone of science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 64(3), pages 351-374, August.
    7. Gabriel Pinski & Francis Narin, 1979. "Structure of the psychological literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 30(3), pages 161-168, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vincenza Carchiolo & Marco Grassia & Michele Malgeri & Giuseppe Mangioni, 2022. "Co-Authorship Networks Analysis to Discover Collaboration Patterns among Italian Researchers," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bei-Ni Yan & Tian-Shyug Lee & Tsung-Pei Lee, 2015. "Mapping the intellectual structure of the Internet of Things (IoT) field (2000–2014): a co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1285-1300, November.
    2. Andreas Bjurström & Merritt Polk, 2011. "Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(3), pages 525-550, June.
    3. Citron, Daniel T. & Way, Samuel F., 2018. "Network assembly of scientific communities of varying size and specificity," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 181-190.
    4. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo & Flavia Costa, 2012. "Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(11), pages 2206-2222, November.
    5. Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger & Xiaoran Yan & Artemy Kolchinsky & Martijn P van den Heuvel & Patric Hagmann & Olaf Sporns, 2019. "A spectrum of routing strategies for brain networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Jianhua Hou, 2017. "Exploration into the evolution and historical roots of citation analysis by referenced publication year spectroscopy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1437-1452, March.
    7. van Eck, N.J.P. & Waltman, L., 2009. "How to Normalize Co-Occurrence Data? An Analysis of Some Well-Known Similarity Measures," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-001-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6201-6224, July.
    9. Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio & Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2017. "A comparison of the Web of Science and publication-level classification systems of science," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 32-45.
    10. Etienne Farvaque & Frédéric Gannon, 2018. "Profiling giants: the networks and influence of Buchanan and Tullock," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 277-302, June.
    11. Jimi Adams & Ryan Light, 2014. "Mapping Interdisciplinary Fields: Efficiencies, Gaps and Redundancies in HIV/AIDS Research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez & J. A. García & J. Fdez-Valdivia, 2014. "Evolutionary games between subject categories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 869-888, October.
    13. Amin Mazloumian, 2012. "Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-5, November.
    14. Peter Biddle & Paul England & Marcus Peinado & Bryan Willman, 2003. "The Darknet and the Future of Content Distribution," Levine's Working Paper Archive 618897000000000636, David K. Levine.
    15. Chen, Xiaoyan & Liu, Yisheng, 2020. "Visualization analysis of high-speed railway research based on CiteSpace," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-17.
    16. Joost Berkhout & Bernd F. Heidergott, 2019. "Analysis of Markov Influence Graphs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 892-904, May.
    17. Hao Wang & Sanhong Deng & Xinning Su, 2016. "A study on construction and analysis of discipline knowledge structure of Chinese LIS based on CSSCI," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1725-1759, December.
    18. Dyhdalewicz Anna & Grześ-Bukłaho Justyna, 2021. "Competences of innovation brokers - experiences of the GoSmart BSR project," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 95-114, December.
    19. Cristiano Varin & Manuela Cattelan & David Firth, 2016. "Statistical modelling of citation exchange between statistics journals," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(1), pages 1-63, January.
    20. Wilfred Dolfsma & Loet Leydesdorff, 2010. "The citation field of evolutionary economics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 645-664, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01175-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.