IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v6y2020i1d10.1057_s41599-020-0387-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The interaction effect of online review language style and product type on consumers’ purchase intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Liu

    (Guangdong Commercial Vocational Technical School)

  • Shao-hui Lei

    (Guangdong University of Finance and Economics)

  • Yu-lang Guo

    (Guangdong University of Finance and Economics)

  • Zhi-ang Zhou

    (Guangdong University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

Previous research has proved that online reviews on purchased goods can observably affect consumers’ evaluation of products, purchase decisions, and purchase behaviors. This study classify online reviews into literal reviews and figurative reviews according to content features and language style. Product type is taken as a moderator to explore the impact of language style of online reviews on consumers’ purchase intentions from the perspective of social presence. Based on two studies in China, the matching between online language style and product type is explored, which has an interactive effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Social presence plays a mediating role. When purchasing search products, literal (vs. figurative) online reviews give consumers stronger social presence, resulting in higher purchase intentions. When purchasing experience products, consumers have stronger social presence because of figurative (vs. literal) online reviews, thus enhancing purchase intentions. The results not only expand the antecedent of social presence, but also offer several practical implications for online practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Liu & Shao-hui Lei & Yu-lang Guo & Zhi-ang Zhou, 2020. "The interaction effect of online review language style and product type on consumers’ purchase intentions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:6:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-0387-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0387-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-020-0387-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-020-0387-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nelson, Phillip, 1970. "Information and Consumer Behavior," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(2), pages 311-329, March-Apr.
    2. Gefen, David & Straub, Detmar W., 2004. "Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 407-424, December.
    3. David Godes & Dina Mayzlin, 2004. "Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 545-560, June.
    4. Martins, José & Costa, Catarina & Oliveira, Tiago & Gonçalves, Ramiro & Branco, Frederico, 2019. "How smartphone advertising influences consumers' purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 378-387.
    5. Michael Scholz & Verena Dorner, 2013. "The Recipe for the Perfect Review?," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(3), pages 141-151, June.
    6. Ann Kronrod & Shai Danziger, 2013. ""Wii Will Rock You!" The Use and Effect of Figurative Language in Consumer Reviews of Hedonic and Utilitarian Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(4), pages 726-739.
    7. Wu, Laurie & Shen, Han & Fan, Alei & Mattila, Anna S., 2017. "The impact of language style on consumers′ reactions to online reviews," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 590-596.
    8. Park, Sangwon & Nicolau, Juan L., 2015. "Asymmetric effects of online consumer reviews," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 67-83.
    9. Fortin, David R. & Dholakia, Ruby Roy, 2005. "Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 387-396, March.
    10. Yanli Jia & Ivy L.B. Liu, 2018. "Do consumers always follow “useful” reviews? The interaction effect of review valence and review usefulness on consumers' purchase decisions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(11), pages 1304-1317, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yao, Ruiqi & Qi, Guijie & Wu, Zhiqiang & Sun, Hua & Sheng, Dongfang, 2024. "Digital human calls you dear: How do customers respond to virtual streamers’ social-oriented language in e-commerce livestreaming? A stereotyping perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Xian Yang & Bilian Lai & Chaolan Tang, 2023. "Experiential Product Promotions on e-Commerce Platform: From the Perspective of Consumer Cognition and Emotion," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    3. Baidyanath Biswas & Pooja Sengupta & Boudhayan Ganguly, 2022. "Your reviews or mine? Exploring the determinants of “perceived helpfulness” of online reviews: a cross-cultural study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1083-1102, September.
    4. Xuguang Sun & Ailing Huang, 2020. "Development of a scale of Chinese primary school teachers’ job embeddedness," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Lili, 2021. "The classification of online consumer reviews: A systematic literature review and integrative framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 226-251.
    2. Chen, Feier & Liu, Stephanie Q. & Mattila, Anna S., 2020. "Bragging and humblebragging in online reviews," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Khim-Yong Goh & Cheng-Suang Heng & Zhijie Lin, 2013. "Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 88-107, March.
    4. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    5. Vazquez, Erik Ernesto & Patel, Chirag & Alvidrez, Salvador & Siliceo, Lorena, 2023. "Images, reviews, and purchase intention on social commerce: The role of mental imagery vividness, cognitive and affective social presence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Miguel Godinho de Matos & Pedro Ferreira & Michael D. Smith & Rahul Telang, 2016. "Culling the Herd: Using Real-World Randomized Experiments to Measure Social Bias with Known Costly Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(9), pages 2563-2580, September.
    7. Zakaria Babutsidze, 2012. "If you love it I'll probably hate it : local interaction among consumers of information goods," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2012-24, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    8. Yogesh V. Joshi & Andres Musalem, 2021. "When Consumers Learn, Money Burns: Signaling Quality via Advertising with Observational Learning and Word of Mouth," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 168-188, January.
    9. Elshaer, Ibrahim A. & Alrawad, Mahmaod & Lutfi, Abdalwali & Azazz, Alaa M.S., 2024. "Social commerce and buying intention post COVID-19: Evidence from a hybrid approach based on SEM – fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Rahat Ullah & Wonjoon Kim & Naveen C. Amblee & Hyunjong Lee & Alice Oh, 2014. "Do Emotions Matter? Exploring The Distribution Of Emotions In Online Product Reviews," Working papers 156, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    11. Lien Thi Kim Nguyen & Hao-Hsuan Chung & Kristine Velasquez Tuliao & Tom M. Y. Lin, 2020. "Using XGBoost and Skip-Gram Model to Predict Online Review Popularity," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    12. Keuschnigg, Marc, 2015. "Product Success in Cultural Markets: The Mediating Role of Familiarity, Peers, and Experts," MPRA Paper 63444, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Walsh, Gianfranco & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Sassenberg, Kai & Bornemann, Daniel, 2010. "Does relationship quality matter in e-services? A comparison of online and offline retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 130-142.
    14. Scott Motyka & Dhruv Grewal & Elizabeth Aguirre & Dominik Mahr & Ko Ruyter & Martin Wetzels, 2018. "The emotional review–reward effect: how do reviews increase impulsivity?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1032-1051, November.
    15. Colmekcioglu, Nazan & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea & Okumus, Fevzi, 2022. "Generation, susceptibility, and response regarding negativity: An in-depth analysis on negative online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 235-250.
    16. Garrett P. Sonnier & Leigh McAlister & Oliver J. Rutz, 2011. "A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Online Communications on Firm Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 702-716, July.
    17. Joffre Swait & Tülin Erdem, 2007. "Brand Effects on Choice and Choice Set Formation Under Uncertainty," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 679-697, 09-10.
    18. Sanjeev Dewan & Jui Ramaprasad, 2012. "Research Note ---Music Blogging, Online Sampling, and the Long Tail," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-2), pages 1056-1067, September.
    19. Wang, Xu & Baesens, Bart & Zhu, Zhen, 2019. "On the optimal marketing aggressiveness level of C2C sellers in social media: Evidence from china," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 83-93.
    20. Belvaux, Bertrand & Mencarelli, Rémi, 2021. "Prevision model and empirical test of box office results for sequels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 38-48.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:6:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-0387-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.