IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v4y2018i1d10.1057_s41599-018-0115-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The politics of the China―Pakistan economic corridor

Author

Listed:
  • Maham Hameed

    (Graduate Institute of Development Studies)

Abstract

China’s presence in the Global South has increased dramatically over the course of a decade. The discourse of mutual benefit and non-intervention has attracted much attention in the developing world, which is now facing the consequences of Western interventions. However, the extent to which Chinese engagement in the developing world stays true to these principles needs to be evaluated in terms of its effects on the political economic structures of the host nations. This study analyses how China and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is interacting with the political and economic realities of Pakistan. Firstly, the study traces the history of regionalism in Pakistan and shows that over the years, the developmental mission of the central state has created deep-seated regionalism in Pakistan. The study shows that CPEC is deepening such cleavages. The regionalist forces have opposed the project in two broad ways: through demanding a greater share in the project or through completely rejecting the interventions. Secondly, the study analyses the lop-sided civil-military relations in Pakistan and concludes that Chinese engagement in Pakistan is leading to the military’s tighter control of civilian and economic matters relating to CPEC.

Suggested Citation

  • Maham Hameed, 2018. "The politics of the China―Pakistan economic corridor," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:4:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-018-0115-7
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-018-0115-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-018-0115-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-018-0115-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Penny Harvey & Hannah Knox, 2012. "The Enchantments of Infrastructure," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 521-536.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kiyya Baloch & Kenneth Andresen, 2020. "Reporting in Conflict Zones in Pakistan: Risks and Challenges for Fixers," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 37-46.
    2. Agnieszka Kuszewska & Agnieszka Nitza-Makowska, 2021. "Multifaceted Aspects of Economic Corridors in the Context of Regional Security: The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor as a Stabilising and Destabilising Factor," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 8(2), pages 218-248, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Goodfellow & Zhengli Huang, 2021. "Contingent infrastructure and the dilution of ‘Chineseness’: Reframing roads and rail in Kampala and Addis Ababa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 655-674, June.
    2. Juan Zhang & Brenda SA Yeoh, 2016. "Harnessing exception: Mobilities, credibility, and the casino," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(6), pages 1064-1081, June.
    3. Jenny McArthur, 2018. "Comparative infrastructural modalities: Examining spatial strategies for Melbourne, Auckland and Vancouver," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(5), pages 816-836, August.
    4. Constance Smith, 2017. "‘Our Changes’? Visions of the Future in Nairobi," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(1), pages 31-40.
    5. Kornberger Martin & Pflueger Dane & Mouritsen Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures : Accounting for platform organization," Post-Print hal-02276737, HAL.
    6. Juana Vera Delgado, 2015. "The socio-cultural, institutional and gender aspects of the water transfer-agribusiness model for food and water security. Lessons learned from Peru," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 7(6), pages 1187-1197, December.
    7. Kornberger, Martin & Pflueger, Dane & Mouritsen, Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 79-95.
    8. Veronica Strang, 2019. "Epilogue: Anthropological conversations with Karl Wittfogel’s ghost," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(7), pages 1252-1257, November.
    9. Cezne, Eric & Hönke, Jana, 2022. "The multiple meanings and uses of South–South relations in extraction: The Brazilian mining company Vale in Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    10. Cornelia Helmcke, 2023. "Technology of detachment: The promise of renewable energy and its contentious reality in the south of Colombia," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(5), pages 976-992, August.
    11. Detlef Müller-Mahn & Kennedy Mkutu & Eric Kioko, 2021. "Megaprojects—mega failures? The politics of aspiration and the transformation of rural Kenya," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(4), pages 1069-1090, August.
    12. Ren, Carina & Jóhannesson, Gunnar Thór & Ásgeirsson, Magnús Haukur & Woodall, Sarah & Reigner, Nathan, 2024. "Rethinking connectivity in Arctic tourism development," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    13. Soliz, Aryana, 2021. "Divergent infrastructure: Uncovering alternative pathways in urban velomobilities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:4:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-018-0115-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.