IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03310-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Colonial policy, ecological transformations, and agricultural “improvement”: comparing agricultural yields and expansion in the Spanish and U.S. Philippines, 1870–1925 CE

Author

Listed:
  • David Max Findley

    (Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
    Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology)

  • Noel Amano

    (Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
    Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology)

  • Ivana Biong

    (University of the Philippines Diliman Campus)

  • Greg Bankoff

    (Ateneo de Manila University)

  • Patricia Irene Dacudao

    (Ateneo de Manila University)

  • Francis Gealogo

    (Ateneo de Manila University)

  • Rebecca Hamilton

    (Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
    Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
    the University of Sydney)

  • Ruel Pagunsan

    (University of the Philippines Diliman Campus)

  • Patrick Roberts

    (Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
    Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
    University of the Philippines Diliman Campus)

Abstract

Burgeoning global trade and colonial policies promoted transformations in land use and agriculture throughout tropical regions in the 19th and 20th centuries, but the local and regional ecological consequences of landscape changes are still being identified and analysed. The Philippine Archipelago, which experienced successive colonial regimes across more than 7100 islands, exemplifies the multiplicity of ecological outcomes produced by these transformations. To better characterise diverse landscape change, we use colonial censuses and datasets to assess land use, production and agricultural yields in the Philippines during the late Spanish and early U.S. colonial periods (ca. 1870–1925). Our novel digital, quantitative analysis indicates that, at the national and provincial scales, agricultural production and land use increased for all major crops in both periods, while agricultural yields were mostly constant. Our results suggest that colonial investments to “improve” Philippine agriculture, specifically their efforts to increase production per hectare, were not effective. Our provincial-scale analysis also confirms the importance of distinct labour patterns, geographies and socio-political arrangements in defining this period’s ecological consequences, and we provide quantified and historically contextualised data in a format amenable to ecologists to promote future, localised historic ecological research.

Suggested Citation

  • David Max Findley & Noel Amano & Ivana Biong & Greg Bankoff & Patricia Irene Dacudao & Francis Gealogo & Rebecca Hamilton & Ruel Pagunsan & Patrick Roberts, 2024. "Colonial policy, ecological transformations, and agricultural “improvement”: comparing agricultural yields and expansion in the Spanish and U.S. Philippines, 1870–1925 CE," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03310-z
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03310-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03310-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03310-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. Christian Wells & Suzanna M. Pratt & Georgia L. Fox & Peter E. Siegel & Nicholas P. Dunning & A. Reginald Murphy, 2018. "Plantation Soilscapes: Initial and Cumulative Impacts of Colonial Agriculture in Antigua, West Indies," Environmental Archaeology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 23-35, January.
    2. Nelson, R.A. & Cramb, R.A. & Mamicpic, M.A., 1998. "Erosion/productivity modelling of maize farming in the Philippine uplands: Part III: economic analysis of alternative farming methods," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 165-183, October.
    3. Jones, Peter M., 2016. "Agricultural Enlightenment: Knowledge, Technology, and Nature, 1750-1840," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198716075.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Sandholt Jensen & Markus Lampe & Paul Sharp & Christian Volmar Skovsgaard, 2018. "‘Getting to Denmark’: the Role of Elites for Development," Working Papers 0125, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    2. Huang, Kaixing, 2024. "The Green Revolution, grain imports, and income divergence in the developing world," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Emmanuelle Quillérou & Richard J. Thomas, 2012. "Costs of land degradation and benefits of land restoration: A review of valuation methods and suggested frameworks for inclusion into policy-making," Post-Print hal-01954793, HAL.
    4. Huang, Kaixing, 2020. "Agricultural Productivity and Income Divergence: Evidence from the Green Revolution," MPRA Paper 108357, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 Jun 2021.
    5. J. Marc MacDonald, 2017. "Malthus and the Philanthropists, 1764–1859: The Cultural Circulation of Political Economy, Botany, and Natural Knowledge," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-33, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03310-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.