IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03279-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toolkitting: an unrecognized form of expertise for overcoming fragmentation in inter- and transdisciplinarity

Author

Listed:
  • Bethany Laursen

    (University of Michigan
    LLC)

  • Bianca Vienni-Baptista

    (ETH Zurich)

  • Gabriele Bammer

    (The Australian National University)

  • Antonietta Giulio

    (University of Basel)

  • Theres Paulsen

    (Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences)

  • Melissa Robson-Williams

    (Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research)

  • Sibylle Studer

    (Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences)

Abstract

A growing number of inter- and transdisciplinary (ITD) toolkits provide methods, processes, concepts, heuristics, frameworks, and other resources for designing and implementing ITD research. A brief overview of the currently fragmented toolkits landscape is provided, fleshed out through descriptions of four toolkits. Fragmentation means that researchers are unaware of, and do not have access to, the full array of tools that could benefit their investigations. Overcoming fragmentation requires attention to toolkitting, which is the relatively overlooked bundle of practices involved in the creation, use, maintenance, funding, and study of toolkits. In particular, the processes and expertise involved in the creation, maintenance, and study of toolkits are described. Toolkitting as metawork can make resources more accessible, useful, and rigorous, enhancing ITD research. Future toolkitting can be strengthened with attention to key questions that can guide the activities of, respectively, toolkit creators and curators, scholars, and funders. Examining the toolkits landscape through the lens of toolkitting suggests that the development of a comprehensive, ongoing inventory is a first step in overcoming toolkit fragmentation. An inventory could also be the foundation for an even bolder initiative—a federated knowledge bank—that connects and develops the range of existing and future toolkits. The inventory and federated knowledge bank also provide a shared project to bring together the expertise of ITD toolkit creators, curators, users, funders, and scholars to achieve a step-change in enhancing ITD research.

Suggested Citation

  • Bethany Laursen & Bianca Vienni-Baptista & Gabriele Bammer & Antonietta Giulio & Theres Paulsen & Melissa Robson-Williams & Sibylle Studer, 2024. "Toolkitting: an unrecognized form of expertise for overcoming fragmentation in inter- and transdisciplinarity," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03279-9
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03279-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03279-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03279-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriele Bammer & Michael O’Rourke & Deborah O’Connell & Linda Neuhauser & Gerald Midgley & Julie Thompson Klein & Nicola J. Grigg & Howard Gadlin & Ian R. Elsum & Marcel Bursztyn & Elizabeth A. Fulto, 2020. "Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Bianca Vienni-Baptista & Isabel Fletcher & Catherine Lyall & Christian Pohl, 2022. "Embracing heterogeneity: Why plural understandings strengthen interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity [Defining Interdisciplinary Research: Conclusions from a Critical Review of the Literature]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(6), pages 865-877.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cyrille Rigolot, 2020. "Transdisciplinarity as a discipline and a way of being: complementarities and creative tensions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-5, December.
    2. Cyrille Rigolot, 2021. "Organizing and better understanding transdisciplinarity in the context of artificial intelligence expansion: a crucial role for the new alliance between economics and engineering," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 48(4), pages 615-620, December.
    3. Arnott, James C., 2021. "Pens and purse strings: Exploring the opportunities and limits to funding actionable sustainability science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    4. Hannah B. Love & Bailey K. Fosdick & Jennifer E. Cross & Meghan Suter & Dinaida Egan & Elizabeth Tofany & Ellen R. Fisher, 2022. "Towards understanding the characteristics of successful and unsuccessful collaborations: a case-based team science study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Alexandra R. Knight & Catherine Allan, 2021. "Intentional Ecology: Integrating environmental expertise through a focus on values, care and advocacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Fedra Vanhuyse, 2024. "The Urban Circularity Assessment Framework (UCAF): a Framework for Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning from CE Transitions in Cities," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1069-1092, June.
    7. Cornelia Fischer & Verena Radinger-Peer & Larissa Krainer & Marianne Penker, 2024. "Communication tools and their support for integration in transdisciplinary research projects," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Laura Mariana Cismaș & Luminița Vochița & Teodor Marian Cojocaru & Răducu-Ștefan Bratu, 2023. "Can Europe Reach Its Environmental Sustainability Targets by 2030? A Critical Mid-Term Assessment of the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-29, December.
    9. Sara Romero-Muñoz & Manuel Alméstar & Teresa Sánchez-Chaparro & Víctor Muñoz Sanz, 2023. "The Impact of Institutional Innovation on a Public Tender: The Case of Madrid Metropolitan Forest," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Bianca Vienni-Baptista & Isabel Fletcher & Catherine Lyall & Christian Pohl, 2022. "Embracing heterogeneity: Why plural understandings strengthen interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity [Defining Interdisciplinary Research: Conclusions from a Critical Review of the Literature]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(6), pages 865-877.
    11. Vincent Caby, 2023. "Techniques for overcoming difficult interdisciplinary dialogue in expert panels: lessons for interactional expertise," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Daniel Black & Susanne Charlesworth & Maria Ester Dal Poz & Erika Cristina Francisco & Adina Paytan & Ian Roderick & Timo von Wirth & Kevin Winter, 2023. "Comparing Societal Impact Planning and Evaluation Approaches across Four Urban Living Labs (in Food-Energy-Water Systems)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Giulia Sonetti & Caterina Barioglio & Daniele Campobenedetto, 2020. "Education for Sustainability in Practice: A Review of Current Strategies within Italian Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Sabine Hoffmann & Lisa Deutsch & Julie Thompson Klein & Michael O’Rourke, 2022. "Integrate the integrators! A call for establishing academic careers for integration experts," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Hannah B. Love & Alyssa Stephens & Bailey K. Fosdick & Elizabeth Tofany & Ellen R. Fisher, 2022. "The impact of gender diversity on scientific research teams: a need to broaden and accelerate future research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Michael Max Bühler & Pia Hollenbach & Alexander Michalski & Sonja Meyer & Emanuel Birle & Rebecca Off & Christina Lang & Wolfram Schmidt & Roberto Cudmani & Oliver Fritz & Guido Baltes & Geraldine Kor, 2023. "The Industrialisation of Sustainable Construction: A Transdisciplinary Approach to the Large-Scale Introduction of Compacted Mineral Mixtures (CMMs) into Building Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, July.
    17. Paul Bolger, 2021. "A study of faculty perceptions and engagement with interdisciplinary research in university sustainability institutes," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 115-129, March.
    18. Bianca Vienni-Baptista & María Goñi Mazzitelli & María Haydeé García Bravo & Inta Rivas Fauré & Daniel Felipe Marín-Vanegas & Cecilia Hidalgo, 2022. "Situated expertise in integration and implementation processes in Latin America," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Hannah B. Love & Jennifer E. Cross & Bailey Fosdick & Kevin R. Crooks & Susan VandeWoude & Ellen R. Fisher, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships drive successful team science: an exemplary case-based study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Amanda E. Cravens & Megan S. Jones & Courtney Ngai & Jill Zarestky & Hannah B. Love, 2022. "Science facilitation: navigating the intersection of intellectual and interpersonal expertise in scientific collaboration," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03279-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.