IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-02264-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who’s in and who’s out? Reading stakeholders and priority issues from sustainability reports in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Sibel Hoştut

    (Faculty of Communication, Akdeniz University)

  • Seçil Deren het Hof

    (Faculty of Communication, Akdeniz University)

  • Hediye Aydoğan

    (Faculty of Communication, Akdeniz University)

  • Gülten Adalı

    (Faculty of Communication, Akdeniz University)

Abstract

This research aims to discover trends regarding stakeholders in sustainability reports. It questions the patterns or trends in addressing stakeholders, based on the assumption that the more a stakeholder is mentioned, the more importance is attached to it. Quantitative content analysis was conducted on a dataset of 179 sustainability reports published between 2004 and 2019 by 26 companies traded in Borsa Istanbul. All stakeholders disclosed in the sustainability reports were coded to create lists and groups, and the changes in stakeholder lists over time were presented. The research identified 102 stakeholders classified into 16 groups. The categorization is a crucial step in the stakeholder identification process as it reveals the hierarchy between stakeholders. By applying a time-series analysis, it was found that companies increasingly valued their employees, making occupational health and safety, diversity and equal opportunity, and talent management as top strategic issues in the Turkish context. This study makes a unique contribution to both the existing stakeholder literature and sustainability reporting within the Turkish context. It offers a pioneering longitudinal analysis of long-term stakeholder representation for listed companies in Turkey, breaking new ground in this area of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Sibel Hoştut & Seçil Deren het Hof & Hediye Aydoğan & Gülten Adalı, 2023. "Who’s in and who’s out? Reading stakeholders and priority issues from sustainability reports in Turkey," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02264-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-02264-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-02264-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-02264-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:majpps:maj-07-2016-1408 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Samantha Miles, 2012. "Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 285-298, July.
    3. Muzammal Khan & Abeer Hassan & Christian Harrison & Heather Tarbert, 2020. "CSR reporting: a review of research and agenda for future research," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(11), pages 1395-1419, July.
    4. Jeffrey J. Brooks, 2022. "Genuine tribal and Indigenous representation in the United States," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-6, December.
    5. Matias Laine, 2010. "The Nature of Nature as a Stakeholder," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 73-78, August.
    6. Cowen, Scott S. & Ferreri, Linda B. & Parker, Lee D., 1987. "The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 111-122, March.
    7. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2017-2872 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Claire Gillet-Monjarret, 2018. "Assurance reports included in the CSR reports of French firms: a longitudinal study," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(5), pages 570-594, October.
    9. Benjamin Neville & Simon Bell & Gregory Whitwell, 2011. "Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Refining, Redefining, and Refueling an Underdeveloped Conceptual Tool," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 357-378, September.
    10. Orhan Akisik & Graham Gal, 2019. "Integrated reports, external assurance and financial performance," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 317-350, October.
    11. Giacomo Manetti, 2011. "The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: empirical evidence and critical points," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 110-122, March.
    12. Najah Attig & Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Jungwon Suh, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Credit Ratings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(4), pages 679-694, November.
    13. Habiba Al-Shaer & Khaldoon Albitar & Khaled Hussainey, 2021. "Creating sustainability reports that matter: an investigation of factors behind the narratives," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(3), pages 738-763, November.
    14. Claire Gillet-Monjarret, 2018. "Assurance reports included in the CSR reports of French firms: a longitudinal study," Post-Print hal-02057105, HAL.
    15. Somaiya Yunus & Evangeline O. Elijido-Ten & Subhash Abhayawansa, 2020. "Impact of stakeholder pressure on the adoption of carbon management strategies," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(7), pages 1189-1212, February.
    16. Pouloudi, Athanasia & Whitley, Edgar A., 1997. "Stakeholder identification in inter-organizational systems: gaining insights for drug use management systems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27187, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Andrea Cardoni & Evgeniia Kiseleva & Simone Terzani, 2019. "Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    18. repec:eme:maj000:maj-07-2016-1408 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    20. Merve Kılıç & Cemil Kuzey, 2018. "Assessing current company reports according to the IIRC integrated reporting framework," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(2), pages 305-333, June.
    21. Pisani, Niccolò & Kourula, Arno & Kolk, Ans & Meijer, Renske, 2017. "How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 591-614.
    22. Stevie Dobbs & Chris van Staden, 2016. "Motivations for corporate social and environmental reporting: New Zealand evidence," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 449-472, September.
    23. Carlos Larrinaga & Jan Bebbington, 2021. "The pre-history of sustainability reporting: a constructivist reading," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(9), pages 162-181, May.
    24. Anastasia Axjonow & Jürgen Ernstberger & Christiane Pott, 2018. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Corporate Reputation: A Non-professional Stakeholder Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 429-450, August.
    25. Muzammal Khan & Abeer Hassan & Christian Harrison & Heather Tarbert, 2020. "CSR reporting: a review of research and agenda for future research," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(11), pages 1395-1419, July.
    26. Higgins, Colin & Tang, Samuel & Stubbs, Wendy, 2020. "On managing hypocrisy: The transparency of sustainability reports," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 395-407.
    27. A Pouloudi & E A Whitley, 1997. "Stakeholder identification in inter-organizational systems: gaining insights for drug use management systems," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Vaupel & David Bendig & Denise Fischer-Kreer & Malte Brettel, 2023. "The Role of Share Repurchases for Firms’ Social and Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 401-428, March.
    2. Jaime-Andres Correa-Garcia & Maria-Antonia Garcia-Benau & Emma Garcia-Meca, 2018. "CSR Communication Strategies of Colombian Business Groups: An Analysis of Corporate Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Richard Stiebal, 2023. "Use of SASB standards for ESG reporting in Europe: Empirical analysis [Empirická analýza použití SASB standardů pro ESG reporting v Evropě]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 5-23.
    4. Ruichen Ma, 2023. "The sustainable development trend in environmental, social, and governance issues and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions in China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 3159-3173, November.
    5. Akhilesh Bajaj & Lori N. K. Leonard & Li Sun & Zhenze Xing, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and annual report reading difficulty," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1393-1428, May.
    6. Ran Tao & Jian Wu & Hong Zhao, 2023. "Do Corporate Customers Prefer Socially Responsible Suppliers? An Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 689-712, July.
    7. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Nicola Raimo & Víctor Amor-Esteban & Filippo Vitolla, 2023. "Board committees and non-financial information assurance services," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 1-42, March.
    8. Kamran Shafique & Cle-Anne Gabriel, 2022. "Vulnerable Stakeholders’ Engagement: Advancing Stakeholder Theory with New Attribute and Salience Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Mahalaxmi Adhikariparajuli & Abeer Hassan & Benedetta Siboni, 2021. "CSR Implication and Disclosure in Higher Education: Uncovered Points. Results from a Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    10. Tahniyath Fatima & Said Elbanna, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Implementation: A Review and a Research Agenda Towards an Integrative Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(1), pages 105-121, February.
    11. Eva Cerioni & Alessia D’Andrea & Marco Giuliani & Stefano Marasca, 2021. "Non-Financial Disclosure and Intra-Industry Comparability: A Macro, Meso and Micro Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Hassan, Qaraman Mohammed & Khudir, Ibrahim Mustafa & Olawuyi, San, Damilola S., 2023. "Regulating corporate social responsibility in energy and extractive industries: The case of international oil companies in a developing country," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    13. Garanina, Tatiana & Aray, Yulia, 2021. "Enhancing CSR disclosure through foreign ownership, foreign board members, and cross-listing: Does it work in Russian context?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    14. Emmanuel Lawal & Gökan May & Bojan Stahl, 2017. "The Significance of Corporate Social Disclosure for High‐Tech Manufacturing Companies: Focus on Employee and Community Aspects of Sustainable Development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 295-311, July.
    15. Mollie Painter & Mar Pérezts & Ghislain Deslandes, 2021. "Understanding the human in stakeholder theory : a phenomenological approach to affect-based learning," Post-Print hal-03188192, HAL.
    16. Agata Pierscieniak & Izabela Krawczyk-Sokolowska & Wieslawa Caputa, 2023. "Micro-foundations of environmental entrepreneurship resistance in SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 71-95, March.
    17. Bart Manning & Geert Braam & Daniel Reimsbach, 2019. "Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct—Effects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 351-366, March.
    18. repec:prg:jnlcfu:v:2023:y:2023:i:1:id:579 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Pucci, Tommaso & Casprini, Elena & Galati, Antonino & Zanni, Lorenzo, 2020. "The virtuous cycle of stakeholder engagement in developing a sustainability culture: Salcheto winery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 364-376.
    20. Alawiya Allui & Luisa Pinto, 2022. "Non-Financial Benefits of Corporate Social Responsibility to Saudi Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    21. Elhassan Kotb Abdelrahman Radwan & Antonella Russo, 2024. "Web‐based corporate social responsibility disclosure practices: A systematic literature review and research directions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 5049-5106, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02264-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.