IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-02017-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-conceptualizing the ideal homes in rural China: an actor-network theory approach

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Wang

    (Sun Yat-Sen University)

  • Shuyue Xie

    (Sun Yat-Sen University)

  • Honggang Xu

    (Sun Yat-Sen University)

Abstract

With the shift in relational ontology, the concept of home is interpreted as a dynamic and relational process, in which both human and non-human elements need to be valued. Adopting ANT (actor-network theory) as an approach, this article reveals the interactive relationship and translation process between urban-rural migrants and rural heterogeneous actors (including farmland, landscapes, local people, means of subsistence, and technological facilities) in the connection of ideal home networks. It involves three steps of translation between actors, namely problem presentation of key actors, enrollment and benefit granting by key actors, and negotiation of “obligatory passage points” (OPP) based on actors’ common goals. Based on a two-year qualitative research of 18 interviewees, this article demonstrates how migrants adapt to the countryside through enrollment and benefit granting, and how sustainability and recyclability become common interests and OPP for actors in homemaking. The article argues that ANT provides a descriptive focus on how rural life has transformed from a backward neighborhood or abstract nostalgia to a harmonious new home that blends traditional culture, ecological ideas, and modern technology in the context of China. The study also points out that in the process of translating interests between actors, the human-land relationship still shows complexity and instability. Future research needs to pay more attention to the role of government officials and governance policies in the building of home networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Wang & Shuyue Xie & Honggang Xu, 2023. "Re-conceptualizing the ideal homes in rural China: an actor-network theory approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02017-x
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-02017-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-02017-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-02017-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yue-Fang Wu & Hong-Gang Xu & Alan A. Lew, 2015. "Consumption-led mobilized urbanism: socio-spatial separation in the second-home city of Sanya," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 136-154, April.
    2. Wu, Yue-Fang & Hannam, Kevin & Xu, Hong-Gang, 2018. "Reconceptualising home in seasonal Chinese tourism mobilities," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 71-80.
    3. Neil Brenner, 2009. "What is critical urban theory?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2-3), pages 198-207, June.
    4. Honggang Xu & Yuefang Wu, 2016. "Lifestyle mobility in China: context, perspective and prospects," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 509-520, August.
    5. Willis, Cheryl & Ladkin, Adele & Jain, Juliet & Clayton, William, 2017. "Present whilst absent: Home and the business tourist gaze," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 48-59.
    6. Peng Wang, 2020. "Sustainability and Resilience of Alternative Lifestyles: An Ethnography of Self-organizing Communities in South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Yue-Fang & Hannam, Kevin & Xu, Hong-Gang, 2018. "Reconceptualising home in seasonal Chinese tourism mobilities," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 71-80.
    2. Zhang, Qingfang & Zhang, Hui & Xu, Honggang, 2021. "Health tourism destinations as therapeutic landscapes: Understanding the health perceptions of senior seasonal migrants," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    3. Yang, Yi & Whitford, Michelle & Lockstone-Binney, Leonie, 2024. "Reconceptualising urban space with second home tourism: The emergence of an urban second-home tourism enclave," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Shanshan Dai & Honggang Xu & Fangfang Chen, 2019. "A Hierarchical Measurement Model of Perceived Resilience of Urban Tourism Destination," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 777-804, September.
    5. Peter Marcuse, 2010. "In defense of theory in practice," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1-2), pages 4-12, February.
    6. Carijn Beumer, 2017. "Sustopia or Cosmopolis? A Critical Reflection on the Sustainable City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Cardullo, Paolo, 2017. "Gentrification in the mesh? Ethnography of Open Wireless Network - Deptford," OSF Preprints jm68s, Center for Open Science.
    8. Chiara Certomà, 2020. "Digital Social Innovation and Urban Space: A Critical Geography Agenda," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 8-19.
    9. Oren Yiftachel, 2016. "The Aleph—Jerusalem as critical learning," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 483-494, June.
    10. Lindsay Blair Howe, 2021. "Thinking through people: The potential of volunteered geographic information for mobility and urban studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(14), pages 3009-3028, November.
    11. Veikko Eranti & Taina Meriluoto, 2023. "PLURALITY IN URBAN POLITICS: Conflict and Commonality in Mouffe and Thévenot," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 693-709, September.
    12. James Rodriguez, 2024. "Carceral connections: The role of policing in the management of public housing in New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 513-530, February.
    13. Mark Whitehead, 2013. "Neoliberal Urban Environmentalism and the Adaptive City: Towards a Critical Urban Theory and Climate Change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(7), pages 1348-1367, May.
    14. Kurt Iveson, 2010. "Some critical reflections on being critical: Reading for deviance, dominance or difference?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 434-441, August.
    15. Marianna d’Ovidio, 2021. "Ethics at work: Diverse economies and place-making in the historical centre of Taranto, Italy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2276-2292, August.
    16. Neil Brenner & Swarnabh Ghosh, 2022. "Between the colossal and the catastrophic: Planetary urbanization and the political ecologies of emergent infectious disease," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(5), pages 867-910, August.
    17. Olga V. Vorobeva & Ekaterina A. Manzhula, 2021. "Smartization in Gatchina: A Case of a Russian Town," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(4), pages 88-103, October.
    18. Kębłowski, Wojciech & Dobruszkes, Frédéric & Boussauw, Kobe, 2022. "Moving past sustainable transport studies: Towards a critical perspective on urban transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 74-83.
    19. Chiara Certomà, 2020. "Digital Social Innovation and Urban Space: A Critical Geography Agenda," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 8-19.
    20. Natalya KOSTKO & Mariya BATYREVA & Irina PECHERKINA & Oksana LAZAREVA, 2021. "Are Smart Technologies An Instrument Of Active City Dwellers?," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(3), pages 73-91, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02017-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.