IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-01741-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Questioning global health in the times of COVID-19: Re-imagining primary health care through the lens of politics of knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Ritu Priya

    (Jawaharlal Nehru University)

  • Amitabha Sarkar

    (The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)

  • Sayan Das

    (Jawaharlal Nehru University)

  • Rakhal Gaitonde

    (Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology)

  • Prachinkumar Ghodajkar

    (Jawaharlal Nehru University)

  • Mohit P. Gandhi

    (Azim Premji University)

Abstract

The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic and the inequitable response to it has created a space for rethinking the knowledge translation that informs current health policy formulation and planning. Wide recognition of the failure of global health governance and national health systems has led to calls for reviving the Primary Health Care (PHC) agenda for post-COVID health systems development. Despite the joint international declaration on PHC made four decades ago, it has had limited application. This paper argues that the recent attempts to rethink PHC will prove inadequate without analysing and learning from the politics of knowledge (PoK) underlying global health policy and planning. Even with the growing relevance of the spirit of the Alma-Ata Declaration (1978) and its operationalisation as detailed in the report of conference proceedings, reassessment of reasons for its limited implementation continues to be located largely in the political economy of the medical establishment, the international economic order or in national governance flaws. Failure to address the dominant knowledge paradigm in the Alma Ata articulation of PHC has contributed to its limited application. This calls for expansion in the analysis from knowledge translation to generation and hierarchisation of knowledge. The paper discusses how the application of PoK as an analytical lens helps understand the power equations underlying the process of knowledge generation and its translation into policy and practice. Beneath the techno-centric and commodified health system is the dominant ‘knowledge’ system whose foundations and assumptions ought to be interrogated. By following a PoK approach, a reorientation of thinking about the relationship between various forms of knowledge and knowledge holders is anticipated. A new health service system design is outlined—translating the spirit of PHC of 1978 into a ‘PHC Version 2.0’—that addresses the PoK gap in operational terms, with an approach to guide all levels of healthcare. It suggests how the world can be empowered to respond better by engaging with diverse ontologies and epistemologies to conceptualise knowledge and frame policies. Further, in the contexts of Asia, Africa and Latin America, it can contribute to the development of self-reliance to democratise general health policy and planning in the post-pandemic period.

Suggested Citation

  • Ritu Priya & Amitabha Sarkar & Sayan Das & Rakhal Gaitonde & Prachinkumar Ghodajkar & Mohit P. Gandhi, 2023. "Questioning global health in the times of COVID-19: Re-imagining primary health care through the lens of politics of knowledge," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01741-8
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01741-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-01741-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-01741-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pearce, N., 1996. "Traditional epidemiology, modern epidemiology, and public health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(5), pages 678-683.
    2. Anant Phadke, 2006. "Revisiting Primary Health Care in the 21st Century," Working Papers id:726, eSocialSciences.
    3. Madhulika Banerjee, 2021. "The Politics of Knowledge in Development: An Analytical Frame," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 9(1), pages 78-90, June.
    4. Nicoletta Dentico, 2021. "The Breathing Catastrophe: COVID-19 and Global Health Governance," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 64(1), pages 4-12, June.
    5. Navarro, Vicente, 1984. "A critique of the ideological and political positions of the Willy Brandt report and the WHO Alma ata declaration," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 467-474, January.
    6. Wisner, Ben, 1988. "Gobi versus PHC? Some dangers of selective primary health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(9), pages 963-969, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Forastiere, 2010. "Climate change and health: a challenge for epidemiology and public health," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(2), pages 83-84, April.
    2. Melissa Chinchilla & Mariana C. Arcaya, 2017. "Using Health Impact Assessment as an Interdisciplinary Teaching Tool," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Colin D Butler, 2019. "Philanthrocapitalism: Promoting Global Health but Failing Planetary Health," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Wei Xun & Aneire Khan & Edwin Michael & Paolo Vineis, 2010. "Climate change epidemiology: methodological challenges," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(2), pages 85-96, April.
    5. Elisabeth Marks & Margaret Cargo & Mark Daniel, 2007. "Constructing A Health And Social Indicator Framework For Indigenous Community Health Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 93-110, May.
    6. Niyi Awofeso, 2011. "Leprosy: International Public Health Policies and Public Health Eras," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Zimmerman, Frederick J., 2013. "Habit, custom, and power: A multi-level theory of population health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 47-56.
    8. van Herten, Loes M. & Gunning-Schepers, Louise J., 2000. "Targets as a tool in health policy: Part I: lessons learned," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 1-11, August.
    9. Aparna Lal, 2016. "Spatial Modelling Tools to Integrate Public Health and Environmental Science, Illustrated with Infectious Cryptosporidiosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-8, February.
    10. Rifat Atun & Thyra de Jongh & Federica V. Secci & Kelechi Ohiri & Olusoji Adeyi, 2009. "Clearing the Global Health Fog : A Systematic Review of the Evidence on Integration of Health Systems and Targeted Interventions," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 5946.
    11. Ronald B. Brown, 2022. "Transdisciplinary model for environmental protection and primordial prevention of disease," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(4), pages 898-904, December.
    12. João Delgado & Simon Pollard & Emma Snary & Edgar Black & George Prpich & Phil Longhurst, 2013. "A Systems Approach to the Policy‐Level Risk Assessment of Exotic Animal Diseases: Network Model and Application to Classical Swine Fever," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(8), pages 1454-1472, August.
    13. Lucia Fazzo & Marco De Santis & Eleonora Beccaloni & Federica Scaini & Ivano Iavarone & Pietro Comba & Domenico Airoma, 2020. "A Geographic Information System-Based Indicator of Waste Risk to Investigate the Health Impact of Landfills and Uncontrolled Dumping Sites," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Roberts, Eric T. & Matthews, Derrick D., 2012. "HIV and chemoprophylaxis, the importance of considering social structures alongside biomedical and behavioral intervention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(9), pages 1555-1561.
    15. Kate Clancy, 1997. "1996 Presidential address to the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 14(2), pages 111-114, June.
    16. Mark Daniel & Margaret Cargo & Elisabeth Marks & Catherine Paquet & David Simmons & Margaret Williams & Kevin Rowley & Kerin O’Dea, 2009. "Rating Health and Social Indicators for Use with Indigenous Communities: A Tool for Balancing Cultural and Scientific Utility," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 241-256, November.
    17. Blakely, Tony & Tobias, Martin & Robson, Bridget & Ajwani, Shilpi & Bonné, Martin & Woodward, Alistair, 2005. "Widening ethnic mortality disparities in New Zealand 1981-99," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(10), pages 2233-2251, November.
    18. Asha S George & Vrinda Mehra & Kerry Scott & Veena Sriram, 2015. "Community Participation in Health Systems Research: A Systematic Review Assessing the State of Research, the Nature of Interventions Involved and the Features of Engagement with Communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Acolin, Jessica & Fishman, Paul, 2023. "Beyond the biomedical, towards the agentic: A paradigm shift for population health science," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01741-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.