IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-01632-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privacy paradox in 3D body scanning technology: the effect of 3D virtual try-on experience in the relationship between privacy concerns and mobile app adoption intention

Author

Listed:
  • Song-yi Youn

    (University of Missouri)

  • Joohye Hwang

    (University of Missouri)

  • Li Zhao

    (University of Missouri)

  • Jong-Bum Kim

    (University of Missouri)

Abstract

3D body scanning technology has emerged in the retail industry by providing easy access to consumers. The technology has been incorporated with virtual-try-on (VTO) services to capture the accurate size of the human body and to provide user-centric experiences to online consumers. While consumers can have their body images scanned and shared with retailers, it raises concerns related to body information security and privacy. With the concern implied, the purpose of this study is to understand the role of consumers’ interaction experience with Avatar-based VTO services in alleviating consumer concerns related to body information privacy to adopt 3D body scanning technology. By adopting the privacy calculus theory and stimulus-organism-response model, the dataset (n = 285) was collected from an online experiment. The direct and indirect paths (i.e., mediation and serial mediation effects) were analyzed by adopting the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach. This study finds body information privacy concerns negatively influence the future adoption of 3D body scanning technology while the perception of interactive features (i.e., perceived control, perceived responsiveness) of the VTO service positively enhances the future adoption. The result also indicates that the negative effects of privacy concerns can be mitigated through consumer experiences enhanced by the personalization and responsiveness features of the VTO service. This study contributes to the literature and industry by examining the potential role of consumers’ interactive experiences in reducing their concerns about body information privacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Song-yi Youn & Joohye Hwang & Li Zhao & Jong-Bum Kim, 2023. "Privacy paradox in 3D body scanning technology: the effect of 3D virtual try-on experience in the relationship between privacy concerns and mobile app adoption intention," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01632-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01632-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-01632-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-01632-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongwei “Chris” Yang, 2014. "Prior Negative Experience, Online Privacy Concerns and Intent to Disclose Personal Information in Chinese Social Media," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 23-44, April.
    2. James D. Abbey & Rainer Kleber & Gilvan C. Souza & Guido Voigt, 2017. "The Role of Perceived Quality Risk in Pricing Remanufactured Products," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(1), pages 100-115, January.
    3. Plotkina, Daria & Saurel, Hélène, 2019. "Me or just like me? The role of virtual try-on and physical appearance in apparel M-retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 362-377.
    4. Jörg Henseler & Marko Sarstedt, 2013. "Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 565-580, April.
    5. J.J. Brakus & B.H. Schmitt & L. Zarantonello, 2009. "Brand Experience: What Is It? How Do We Measure It? And Does It Affect Loyalty?," Post-Print hal-00799102, HAL.
    6. Benlian, Alexander & Klumpe, Johannes & Hinz, Oliver, 2020. "Mitigating the Intrusive Effects of Smart Home Assistants by using Anthropomorphic Design Features: A Multi-Method Investigation," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 112151, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Marios Koufaris, 2002. "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 205-223, June.
    8. Kim, Jiyeon & Forsythe, Sandra, 2008. "Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 45-59.
    9. Farah, Maya F. & Ramadan, Zahy B. & Harb, Dana H., 2019. "The examination of virtual reality at the intersection of consumer experience, shopping journey and physical retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 136-143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tueanrat, Yanika & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2021. "A conceptual framework of the antecedents of customer journey satisfaction in omnichannel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Osama Sohaib & Kyeong Kang & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2018. "Gender-Based iTrust in E-Commerce: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    4. Barnes, Stuart J. & Mattsson, Jan & Sørensen, Flemming, 2014. "Destination brand experience and visitor behavior: Testing a scale in the tourism context," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 121-139.
    5. Pierre Volle & Ahmed Anis Charfi, 2011. "Valeur perçue et comportements en ligne en état d'immersion : le rôle modérateur de l'implication et de l'expertise," Post-Print halshs-00638649, HAL.
    6. Cristian Morosan, 2021. "An affective approach to modelling intentions to use technologies for social distancing in hotels," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 549-573, December.
    7. Axel Berger & Tobias Schlager & David E. Sprott & Andreas Herrmann, 2018. "Gamified interactions: whether, when, and how games facilitate self–brand connections," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 652-673, July.
    8. Domina, Tanya & Lee, Seung-Eun & MacGillivray, Maureen, 2012. "Understanding factors affecting consumer intention to shop in a virtual world," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 613-620.
    9. Arghashi, Vahideh & Yuksel, Cenk Arsun, 2022. "Interactivity, Inspiration, and Perceived Usefulness! How retailers’ AR-apps improve consumer engagement through flow," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. Mourad, Siham & Valette-Florence, Pierre, 2016. "Improving prediction with POS and PLS consistent estimations: An illustration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4675-4684.
    11. Hollebeek, Linda D. & Clark, Moira K. & Andreassen, Tor W. & Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Smith, Dale, 2020. "Virtual reality through the customer journey: Framework and propositions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    12. Farah, Maya F. & Ramadan, Zahy B., 2020. "Viability of Amazon’s driven innovations targeting shoppers’ impulsiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    13. Pantano, Eleonora & Rese, Alexandra & Baier, Daniel, 2017. "Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 81-95.
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6813 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Pizzi, Gabriele & Vannucci, Virginia & Aiello, Gaetano, 2020. "Branding in the time of virtual reality: Are virtual store brand perceptions real?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 502-510.
    16. Juan Miguel Alcántara-Pilar & Salvador del Barrio-García & Lucia Porcu & Esmeralda Crespo-Almendros, 2015. "Motivational Duality in Online Consumer Behaviour: Website Usability and Flow State as Moderating Factors," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 14(1), pages 79-104, June.
    17. Han, Sang-Lin & An, Myounga & Han, Jerry J. & Lee, Jiyoung, 2020. "Telepresence, time distortion, and consumer traits of virtual reality shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 311-320.
    18. Kirk, Colleen P. & Chiagouris, Larry & Gopalakrishna, Pradeep, 2012. "Some people just want to read: The roles of age, interactivity, and perceived usefulness of print in the consumption of digital information products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 168-178.
    19. Untung Rahardja & Tanaporn Hongsuchon & Taqwa Hariguna & Athapol Ruangkanjanases, 2021. "Understanding Impact Sustainable Intention of S-Commerce Activities: The Role of Customer Experiences, Perceived Value, and Mediation of Relationship Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Davis, Robert & Smith, Sandra D. & Lang, Bodo U., 2017. "A comparison of online and offline gender and goal directed shopping online," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 118-125.
    21. Pallant, Jessica L. & Karpen, Ingo O. & Sands, Sean J., 2022. "What drives consumers to customize products? The mediating role of brand experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01632-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.