IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v68y2017i5d10.1057_s41274-016-0107-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining new possible weight values in PROMETHEE: a procedure based on data envelopment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Maryam Bagherikahvarin

    (Université libre de Bruxelles)

  • Yves Smet

    (Université libre de Bruxelles)

Abstract

Operational research (OR) offers efficient tools to support managers in strategic decision-making processes. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and multiple criteria decision aid (MCDA) are two important research areas in OR. These two domains are both based on the evaluation of “objects” according to multiple “points of views”. Within the MCDA framework, choosing appropriate weights for the different criteria often arises as a problem itself for decision makers. As a consequence, researchers have developed original methodologies to help them during this elicitation phase. In this work, we aim to investigate how DEA can be used to propose weights in the context of the PROMETHEE II method. More precisely, we suggest an extension of the so-called “decision maker brain” used in the GAIA plane (also known as PROMETHEE VI) based on DEA. The underlying idea is based on the computation of weights in PROMETHEE (GAIA brain) which are compatible with the DEA analysis. We end this paper with a numerical example.

Suggested Citation

  • Maryam Bagherikahvarin & Yves Smet, 2017. "Determining new possible weight values in PROMETHEE: a procedure based on data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(5), pages 484-495, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:68:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1057_s41274-016-0107-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41274-016-0107-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41274-016-0107-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41274-016-0107-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shiuh-Nan Hwang & Tong-Liang Kao, 2008. "Using two-stage DEA to measure managerial efficiency change of non-life insurance companies in Taiwan," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 377-401.
    2. M. E. Dyer, 1983. "The Complexity of Vertex Enumeration Methods," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 381-402, August.
    3. Per Andersen & Niels Christian Petersen, 1993. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1261-1264, October.
    4. Josef Jablonsky, 2012. "Multicriteria approaches for ranking of efficient units in DEA models," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(3), pages 435-449, September.
    5. T. H. Matheiss & David S. Rubin, 1980. "A Survey and Comparison of Methods for Finding All Vertices of Convex Polyhedral Sets," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 167-185, May.
    6. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    7. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    8. Quantin Hayez & Yves De Smet & Jimmy Bonney, 2012. "D-Sight: A New Decision Making Software to Address Multi-Criteria Problems," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 4(4), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Keeney,Ralph L. & Raiffa,Howard, 1993. "Decisions with Multiple Objectives," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521438834, September.
    10. Mareschal, Bertrand & Brans, Jean-Pierre, 1988. "Geometrical representations for MCDA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 69-77, February.
    11. Roll, Y & Golany, B., 1993. "Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 99-109, January.
    12. C A K Lovell & A P B Rouse, 2003. "Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(1), pages 101-108, January.
    13. Doyle, J & Green, R, 1993. "Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 713-715, November.
    14. Carlo Salerno, 2006. "Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Improve Estimates of Higher Education Institution's Per-student Education Costs," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 281-295.
    15. Zhu, Joe, 1996. "Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 451-460, May.
    16. Shang, Jen & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 1995. "A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 297-315, September.
    17. Banker, Rajiv D. & Cooper, William W. & Seiford, Lawrence M. & Thrall, Robert M. & Zhu, Joe, 2004. "Returns to scale in different DEA models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(2), pages 345-362, April.
    18. Kleine, A., 2004. "A general model framework for DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 17-23, February.
    19. Sarkis, Joseph, 2000. "A comparative analysis of DEA as a discrete alternative multiple criteria decision tool," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 543-557, June.
    20. Lawrence Seiford, 1997. "A bibliography for Data Envelopment Analysis (1978-1996)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 73(0), pages 393-438, October.
    21. Takamura, Yoshiharu & Tone, Kaoru, 2003. "A comparative site evaluation study for relocating Japanese government agencies out of Tokyo," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 85-102, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. I. Argyriou & N. Sifakis & T. Tsoutsos, 2022. "Ranking measures to improve the sustainability of Mediterranean ports based on multicriteria decision analysis: a case study of Souda port, Chania, Crete," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6449-6466, May.
    2. Arcidiacono, Sally Giuseppe & Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore, 2018. "GAIA-SMAA-PROMETHEE for a hierarchy of interacting criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 606-624.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rezaeiani, M.J. & Foroughi, A.A., 2018. "Ranking efficient decision making units in data envelopment analysis based on reference frontier share," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 665-674.
    2. Lampe, Hannes W. & Hilgers, Dennis, 2015. "Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 1-21.
    3. Karasakal, Esra & Aker, Pınar, 2017. "A multicriteria sorting approach based on data envelopment analysis for R&D project selection problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 79-92.
    4. Kerstens, Kristiaan & Sadeghi, Jafar & Toloo, Mehdi & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2022. "Procedures for ranking technical and cost efficient units: With a focus on nonconvexity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 269-281.
    5. Shih-Heng Yu & Chia-Wei Hsu, 2020. "A unified extension of super-efficiency in additive data envelopment analysis with integer-valued inputs and outputs: an application to a municipal bus system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 515-535, April.
    6. Cheng, Gang & Qian, Zhenhua & Zervopoulos, Panagiotis, 2011. "Overcoming the infeasibility of super-efficiency DEA model: a model with generalized orientation," MPRA Paper 31991, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Vicente J. Bolós & Rafael Benítez & Vicente Coll-Serrano, 2023. "Continuous models combining slacks-based measures of efficiency and super-efficiency," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 363-391, June.
    8. Thies, Christian & Kieckhäfer, Karsten & Spengler, Thomas S. & Sodhi, Manbir S., 2019. "Operations research for sustainability assessment of products: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 1-21.
    9. Dyckhoff, Harald & Souren, Rainer, 2022. "Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis and production theory for performance evaluation: Framework and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 795-816.
    10. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    11. W D Cook & L Liang & Y Zha & J Zhu, 2009. "A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(2), pages 276-281, February.
    12. Ruiz, José L. & Segura, José V. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2015. "Benchmarking and target setting with expert preferences: An application to the evaluation of educational performance of Spanish universities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 594-605.
    13. Seyed Saeed Hosseinian & Hamidreza Navidi & Abas Hajfathaliha, 2012. "A New Linear Programming Method for Weights Generation and Group Decision Making in the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 233-254, May.
    14. Constantino J. Garcia Martin & Amparo Medal-Bartual & Marta Peris-Ortiz, 2014. "Analysis of efficiency and profitability of franchise services," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9-10), pages 796-810, July.
    15. Ya Chen & Yongjun Li & Liang Liang & Huaqing Wu, 2019. "An extension on super slacks-based measure DEA approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 101-121, July.
    16. Nahra, Tammie A. & Mendez, David & Alexander, Jeffrey A., 2009. "Employing super-efficiency analysis as an alternative to DEA: An application in outpatient substance abuse treatment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1097-1106, August.
    17. Mohammad Pakkar, 2015. "An integrated approach based on DEA and AHP," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 153-169, January.
    18. C A K Lovell & A P B Rouse, 2003. "Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(1), pages 101-108, January.
    19. Cook, Wade D. & Seiford, Larry M., 2009. "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Chiu, Yung-Ho & Chen, Yu-Chuan, 2009. "The analysis of Taiwanese bank efficiency: Incorporating both external environment risk and internal risk," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 456-463, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:68:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1057_s41274-016-0107-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.