IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v67y2016i5p752-769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proportionate flow-shop scheduling with rejection

Author

Listed:
  • Dvir Shabtay

    (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel)

  • Daniel Oron

    (The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia)

Abstract

In many heavily loaded manufacturing systems, managers routinely make use of outsourcing options in order to maintain reasonable Quality of Service for customers. Thus, there is a strong need to provide tools for managers to economically coordinate sourcing and scheduling decisions. Our main aim is to provide such tools for an important set of flow-shop scheduling problems where rejection (outsourcing) is allowed and processing times are machine-independent. Our scheduling problems are essentially bicriteria problems, which combine a scheduling objective and the total outsourcing cost. We study several problems which differ according to the scheduling criterion considered. Moreover, each problem is divided into four different variations depending on the way the two criteria are dealt with. For example, in one variation the two criteria are aggregated into a single objective function; in two other variations the aim consists of minimizing one criterion subject to ensuring that the value of the other criterion will not exceed a predefined threshold. From a theoretical point of view, a computational complexity classification is provided for all variations of the problems under consideration. Moreover, optimization algorithms have been constructed to solve all problem variations, and approximation schemes have been developed for solving hard variations. Those schemes enable managers to solve large instances of hard variations while controlling the maximal gap between the obtained solution and the (unknown) optimal solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Dvir Shabtay & Daniel Oron, 2016. "Proportionate flow-shop scheduling with rejection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(5), pages 752-769, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:67:y:2016:i:5:p:752-769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v67/n5/pdf/jors201595a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v67/n5/full/jors201595a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danny Hermelin & Dvir Shabtay & Chen Zelig & Michael Pinedo, 2022. "A general scheme for solving a large set of scheduling problems with rejection in FPT time," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 229-255, April.
    2. Mosheiov, Gur & Oron, Daniel & Shabtay, Dvir, 2021. "Minimizing total late work on a single machine with generalized due-dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 837-846.
    3. Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2023. "A classification of dynamic programming formulations for offline deterministic single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 999-1017.
    4. Mohamadreza Dabiri & Mehdi Yazdani & Bahman Naderi & Hassan Haleh, 2022. "Modeling and solution methods for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with job rejection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2721-2765, July.
    5. Oron, Daniel, 2021. "Two-agent scheduling problems under rejection budget constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Shabtay, Dvir & Gerstl, Enrique, 2024. "Coordinating scheduling and rejection decisions in a two-machine flow shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 887-898.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:67:y:2016:i:5:p:752-769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.