IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v58y2007i7d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimizing makespan on a two-machine re-entrant flowshop

Author

Listed:
  • S-W Choi

    (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Y-D Kim

    (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

Abstract

This paper focuses on a two-machine re-entrant flowshop scheduling problem with the objective of minimizing makespan. In the re-entrant flowshop considered here, all jobs must be processed twice on each machine, that is, each job should be processed on machine 1, machine 2 and then machine 1 and machine 2. We develop dominance properties, lower bounds and heuristic algorithms for the problem, and use these to develop a branch and bound algorithm. For evaluation of the performance of the algorithms, computational experiments are performed on randomly generated test problems. Results of the experiments show that the suggested branch and bound algorithm can solve problems with up to 200 jobs in a reasonable amount of CPU time.

Suggested Citation

  • S-W Choi & Y-D Kim, 2007. "Minimizing makespan on a two-machine re-entrant flowshop," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(7), pages 972-981, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:58:y:2007:i:7:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602220
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602220
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602220?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I.G. Drobouchevitch & V.A. Strusevich, 1999. "A heuristic algorithm for two‐machine re‐entrant shop scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 86(0), pages 417-439, January.
    2. Graves, Stephen C., 1983. "Scheduling of re-entrant flow shops," Working papers 1438-83., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    3. Allahverdi, Ali, 2003. "The two- and m-machine flowshop scheduling problems with bicriteria of makespan and mean flowtime," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 373-396, June.
    4. M. Y. Wang & S. P. Sethi & S. L. van de Velde, 1997. "Minimizing Makespan in a Class of Reentrant Shops," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 702-712, October.
    5. Pearn, W. L. & Chung, S. H. & Chen, A. Y. & Yang, M. H., 2004. "A case study on the multistage IC final testing scheduling problem with reentry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 257-267, April.
    6. Nawaz, Muhammad & Enscore Jr, E Emory & Ham, Inyong, 1983. "A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine, n-job flow-shop sequencing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 91-95.
    7. JC-H Pan & J-S Chen, 2003. "Minimizing makespan in re-entrant permutation flow-shops," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(6), pages 642-653, June.
    8. Wieslaw Kubiak & Sheldon X. C. Lou & Yingmeng Wang, 1996. "Mean Flow Time Minimization in Reentrant Job Shops with a Hub," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(5), pages 764-776, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choi, Seong-Woo & Kim, Yeong-Dae, 2009. "Minimizing total tardiness on a two-machine re-entrant flowshop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 375-384, December.
    2. Yu, Tae-Sun & Pinedo, Michael, 2020. "Flow shops with reentry: Reversibility properties and makespan optimal schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 478-490.
    3. JC-H Pan & J-S Chen, 2003. "Minimizing makespan in re-entrant permutation flow-shops," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(6), pages 642-653, June.
    4. Gerardo Minella & Rubén Ruiz & Michele Ciavotta, 2008. "A Review and Evaluation of Multiobjective Algorithms for the Flowshop Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 451-471, August.
    5. W Q Huang & L Wang, 2006. "A local search method for permutation flow shop scheduling," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(10), pages 1248-1251, October.
    6. Aldowaisan, Tariq & Allahverdi, Ali, 2004. "New heuristics for m-machine no-wait flowshop to minimize total completion time," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 345-352, October.
    7. Yang, Dar-Li & Kuo, Wen-Hung & Chern, Maw-Sheng, 2008. "Multi-family scheduling in a two-machine reentrant flow shop with setups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1160-1170, June.
    8. J E C Arroyo & V A Armentano, 2004. "A partial enumeration heuristic for multi-objective flowshop scheduling problems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(9), pages 1000-1007, September.
    9. Ahmadian, Mohammad Mahdi & Khatami, Mostafa & Salehipour, Amir & Cheng, T.C.E., 2021. "Four decades of research on the open-shop scheduling problem to minimize the makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 399-426.
    10. Yenisey, Mehmet Mutlu & Yagmahan, Betul, 2014. "Multi-objective permutation flow shop scheduling problem: Literature review, classification and current trends," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-135.
    11. Allahverdi, Ali & Aldowaisan, Tariq, 2002. "New heuristics to minimize total completion time in m-machine flowshops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 71-83, May.
    12. Andrzej Kozik, 2017. "Handling precedence constraints in scheduling problems by the sequence pair representation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 445-472, February.
    13. Hongyu He & Yanzhi Zhao & Xiaojun Ma & Zheng-Guo Lv & Ji-Bo Wang, 2023. "Branch-and-Bound and Heuristic Algorithms for Group Scheduling with Due-Date Assignment and Resource Allocation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Sündüz Dağ, 2013. "An Application On Flowshop Scheduling," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 1(1), pages 47-56, December.
    15. Chen, Chuen-Lung & Vempati, Venkateswara S. & Aljaber, Nasser, 1995. "An application of genetic algorithms for flow shop problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 389-396, January.
    16. Solimanpur, M. & Vrat, Prem & Shankar, Ravi, 2004. "A heuristic to minimize makespan of cell scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 231-241, April.
    17. Barry B. & Quim Castellà & Angel A. & Helena Ramalhinho Lourenco & Manuel Mateo, 2012. "ILS-ESP: An Efficient, Simple, and Parameter-Free Algorithm for Solving the Permutation Flow-Shop Problem," Working Papers 636, Barcelona School of Economics.
    18. Gupta, Jatinder N.D. & Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2006. "Performance guarantees for flowshop heuristics to minimize makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 865-872, March.
    19. Yu-Jun Zheng & Yi-Chen Du & Wei-Guo Sheng & Hai-Feng Ling, 2019. "Collaborative Human–UAV Search and Rescue for Missing Tourists in Nature Reserves," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 371-383, September.
    20. Brammer, Janis & Lutz, Bernhard & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Permutation flow shop scheduling with multiple lines and demand plans using reinforcement learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 75-86.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:58:y:2007:i:7:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.