IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxixy2019i1p152-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food Waste and Rural Tourism – a Romanian Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ramona Cantaragiu

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Shahrazad Hadad

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Elena Condrea

    (“Ovidius†University of Constanta)

Abstract

The present paper shades light into two very hot topics: food waste and rural tourism. in this very fast-paced and consumerist society the issue of food waste becomes of crucial importance in the context of a sustainable bioeconomy conducted under the context of rural tourism. Therefore, the hereby research. The current paper addresses the problem of food waste in rural touristic accommodation from the perspective of the behavior of the guests towards food consumed while traveling/vacationing. through a comprehensive review of the studies currently available, it is established that there are indications that individuals change their food habits while traveling and that these changes can have a negative impact on the amount of food wasted (i.e., by increasing the amount of food that goes unconsumed). The paper concludes with a discussion of the findings and a series of recommendations both for policy makers and for the managers of rural touristic accommodations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramona Cantaragiu & Shahrazad Hadad & Elena Condrea, 2019. "Food Waste and Rural Tourism – a Romanian Perspective," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 152-160, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xix:y:2019:i:1:p:152-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://stec.univ-ovidius.ro/html/anale/RO/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/4-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juvan, Emil & Dolnicar, Sara, 2016. "Measuring environmentally sustainable tourist behaviour," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 30-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristina Bianca Pocol & Margaux Pinoteau & Antonio Amuza & Adriana Burlea-Schiopoiu & Alexandra-Ioana Glogovețan, 2020. "Food Waste Behavior among Romanian Consumers: A Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Maria-Georgeta Moldovan & Dan-Cristian Dabija & Cristina Bianca Pocol, 2022. "Resources Management for a Resilient World: A Literature Review of Eastern European Countries with Focus on Household Behaviour and Trends Related to Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonmenjoy Barman & Somenath Halder & Jayanta Das & Syed Sadath Ali & Fahdah Falah Ben Hasher & Rukhsana & Mohamed Zhran, 2024. "Sustainable Ecotourism Suitability Assessment Using the Intergraded TOPSIS Model in the State of Mizoram, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Qing Zhou, 2020. "Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Pipatpong Fakfare & Walanchalee Wattanacharoensil, 2023. "Low‐carbon tourism for island destinations: A crucial alternative for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 180-197, February.
    4. Philip R. Walsh & Rachel Dodds & Julianna Priskin & Jonathon Day & Oxana Belozerova, 2021. "The Corporate Responsibility Paradox: A Multi-National Investigation of Business Traveller Attitudes and Their Sustainable Travel Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Farzana Sharmin & Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Alina Badulescu & Dorin Paul Bac & Benqian Li, 2020. "Millennial Tourists’ Environmentally Sustainable Behavior Towards a Natural Protected Area: An Integrative Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Else Ragni Yttredal & Nathalie Homlong, 2020. "Perception of Sustainable Development in a Local World Heritage Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Ahmad Jusoh & Habib Zare, 2017. "Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Solve Environmental Sustainability Problems: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-65, October.
    8. Rui Zhao & Dingye Wu & Sebastiano Patti, 2020. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Carbon Labeling Schemes in the Period 2007–2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Gina Ionela Butnaru & Valentin Niţă & Cristiana Melinte & Alexandru Anichiti & Geanina Brînză, 2022. "The Nexus between Sustainable Behaviour of Tourists from Generation Z and the Factors That Influence the Protection of Environmental Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Grzegorz Bonusiak, 2021. "Development of Ecotourism in Svalbard as Part of Norway’s Arctic Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Tussyadiah, Iis & Miller, Graham, 2019. "Nudged by a robot: Responses to agency and feedback," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Adongo, Charles A. & Taale, Francis & Adam, Issahaku, 2018. "Tourists' values and empathic attitude toward sustainable development in tourism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 251-263.
    13. Fajri Ansari & Yoonjeong Jeong & Indra ASLP Putri & Seong-il Kim, 2019. "Sociopsychological Aspects of Butterfly Souvenir Purchasing Behavior at Bantimurung Bulusaraung National Park in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Alessandra Fermani & Maria Rita Sergi & Angelo Carrieri & Isabella Crespi & Laura Picconi & Aristide Saggino, 2020. "Sustainable Tourism and Facilities Preferences: The Sustainable Tourist Stay Scale (STSS) Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Dolnicar, Sara & Knezevic Cvelbar, Ljubica & Grün, Bettina, 2019. "Changing service settings for the environment," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 301-304.
    16. Maria Juschten & Shannon Page & Helen Fitt, 2020. "Mindsets Set in Concrete? Exploring the Perspectives of Domestic Travellers on New Zealand’s (Auto-)Mobility Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Zhang, Hongchao & Groshong, Lisa & Stanis, Sonja Wilhelm & Morgan, Mark, 2021. "Comparing onsite electronic survey distribution methods," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    18. Angelo Presenza & Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli & Angelo Natalicchio, 2019. "Business Model Innovation for Sustainability. Highlights from the Tourism and Hospitality Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-5, January.
    19. Shahrukh Aman & Nadir Munir Hassan & Mohammad Nisar Khattak & Mohamed A. Moustafa & Mahendra Fakhri & Zeeshan Ahmad, 2021. "Impact of Tourist’s Environmental Awareness on Pro-Environmental Behavior with the Mediating Effect of Tourist’s Environmental Concern and Moderating Effect of Tourist’s Environmental Attachment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Dolnicar, Sara & Cvelbar, Ljubica Knezevic & Grün, Bettina, 2019. "Changing service settings for the environment: How to reduce negative environmental impacts without sacrificing tourist satisfaction," SocArXiv 83rqu, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    food waste; rural tourism; sustainable economy; natural resources; accommodation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L66 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Food; Beverages; Cosmetics; Tobacco
    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xix:y:2019:i:1:p:152-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gheorghiu Gabriela (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoviro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.