IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v49y2022i6p915-927..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative innovation and crises: Foreign subsidiaries, state-owned enterprises, and domestic private firms
[Directorship Interlocks in Comparative Perspective: The Case of Spain]

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio García-Sánchez
  • Ruth Rama

Abstract

This article studies whether foreign subsidiaries (FSs) are able to cooperate for innovation with local partners during good and harsh economic times. It also enquires as to whether these companies and different types of domestic firms displayed similar cooperative behaviour during 2004–16. The period is divided into three sub-periods (boom, downturn, and recovery), and three logit models with panel data of a representative sample of Spanish firms are proposed. The ability of FSs to cooperate for innovation is maintained throughout the business cycle. These firms are better at cooperating than are unaffiliated firms but not significantly better than domestic business groups. State-owned enterprises strongly outperform both FSs and domestic private firms during the boom, the downturn, and the recovery. Unaffiliated domestic firms manage to cooperate during the boom and the recovery but not during the downturn. Predictors of cooperative innovation vary throughout the business cycle. The results contain policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio García-Sánchez & Ruth Rama, 2022. "Cooperative innovation and crises: Foreign subsidiaries, state-owned enterprises, and domestic private firms [Directorship Interlocks in Comparative Perspective: The Case of Spain]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(6), pages 915-927.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:915-927.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scac038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Srholec, 2009. "Does foreign ownership facilitate cooperation on innovation? Firm-level evidence from the enlarged European Union," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 21(1), pages 47-62, February.
    2. Bernd Ebersberger & Sverre J. Herstad, 2012. "Go abroad or have strangers visit? On organizational search spaces and local linkages," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 273-295, January.
    3. Dau, Luis Alfonso & Moore, Elizabeth M. & Kostova, Tatiana, 2020. "The impact of market based institutional reforms on firm strategy and performance: Review and extension," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    4. Antonio García-Sánchez & Ruth Rama, 2020. "Foreign ownership and domestic cooperation for innovation during good and harsh economic times," International Journal of Multinational Corporation Strategy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 4-25.
    5. Landoni, Matteo, 2020. "Knowledge creation in state-owned enterprises," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 77-85.
    6. Gordon Walker & Bruce Kogut & Weijian Shan, 1997. "Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 109-125, April.
    7. Veugelers, Reinhilde & Cassiman, Bruno, 2004. "Foreign subsidiaries as a channel of international technology diffusion: Some direct firm level evidence from Belgium," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 455-476, April.
    8. Mark Granovetter, 2005. "The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 33-50, Winter.
    9. Manuel Fernández-Esquinas & Irene Ramos-Vielba, 2011. "Emerging forms of cross-sector collaboration in the Spanish innovation system," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 135-146, March.
    10. Xielin Liu & Sylvia Schwaag Serger & Ulrike Tagscherer & Amber Y. Chang, 2017. "Beyond catch-up—can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle income trap?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(5), pages 656-669.
    11. Dragana Radicic & David Douglas & Geoff Pugh & Ian Jackson, 2019. "Cooperation For Innovation And Its Impact On Technological And Non-Technological Innovations: Empirical Evidence For European Smes In Traditional Manufacturing Industries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-41, June.
    12. Miotti, Luis & Sachwald, Frederique, 2003. "Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1481-1499, September.
    13. Ruth Rama & Deron Ferguson, 2007. "Emerging Districts Facing Structural Reform: The Madrid Electronics District and the Reshaping of the Spanish Telecom Monopoly," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(9), pages 2207-2231, September.
    14. Lhuillery, Stéphane & Pfister, Etienne, 2009. "R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 45-57, February.
    15. Strange, Roger & Newton, James, 2006. "Stephen Hymer and the externalization of production," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 180-193, April.
    16. Angel Calvo, 2019. "The Emergence of Global Companies in the High-Tech Industry of Defense: The Case of Indra in Spain, 1993-2007," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 7(2), pages 29-47.
    17. Magdolna Sass & Andrea Szalavetz, 2013. "Crisis and Upgrading: The Case of the Hungarian Automotive and Electronics Sectors," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(3), pages 489-507.
    18. Laura Cruz-Castro & Adelheid Holl & Ruth Rama & Luis Sanz-Menéndez, 2018. "Economic crisis and company R&D in Spain: do regional and policy factors matter?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 729-751, September.
    19. Antonio García Sánchez & José Molero & Ruth Rama, 2016. "Local cooperation for innovation: food and beverage multinationals in a peripheral European country," International Journal of Multinational Corporation Strategy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 107-132.
    20. Valmir Emil Hoffmann & Fiorenza Belussi & M. Teresa Martínez-Fernández & Edgar Reyes, 2017. "United we stand, divided we fall? Clustered firms’ relationships after the 2008 crisis," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(7-8), pages 735-758, August.
    21. Claudio Cozza & Giulio Perani & Antonello Zanfei, 2018. "Multinationals and R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from the Italian R&D survey," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 35(2), pages 601-621, August.
    22. Emanuele Brancati & Raffaele Brancati & Andrea Maresca, 2017. "Global value chains, innovation and performance: firm-level evidence from the Great Recession," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(5), pages 1039-1073.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marina Papanastassiou & Robert Pearce & Antonello Zanfei, 2020. "Changing perspectives on the internationalization of R&D and innovation by multinational enterprises: A review of the literature," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(4), pages 623-664, June.
    2. Claudio Cozza & Giulio Perani & Antonello Zanfei, 2018. "Multinationals and R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from the Italian R&D survey," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 35(2), pages 601-621, August.
    3. Duong, Phuong-Anh Nguyen & Voordeckers, Wim & Huybrechts, Jolien & Lambrechts, Frank, 2022. "On external knowledge sources and innovation performance: Family versus non-family firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Adelheid Holl & Ruth Rama, 2014. "Foreign Subsidiaries and Technology Sourcing in Spain," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 43-64, January.
    5. Manuela Gussoni, 2009. "The determinants of inter-firms R&D cooperation and partner selection. A literature overview," Discussion Papers 2009/86, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    6. Brache, Jose & Callagher, Lisa & Husted, Kenneth, 2022. "The effects of interfirm cooperation purpose on export performance: Choosing between local and overseas partners," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 12-22.
    7. Martin Srholec, 2015. "Understanding the diversity of cooperation on innovation across countries: multilevel evidence from Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1-2), pages 159-182, March.
    8. Enrico Vanino & Stephen Roper & Bettina Becker, 2020. "Knowledge to Money: Assessing the Business Performance Effects of Publicly Funded R&D Grants," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(04), pages 20-24, January.
    9. Martinez-Noya, Andrea & Narula, Rajneesh, 2018. "What more can we learn from R&D alliances? : A review and research agenda," MERIT Working Papers 2018-022, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. Feng Li & Yalong Wang, 2022. "Study on the Evolutionary Game of Cooperation and Innovation in Science and Technology Town Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Santamaría, Luis & Nieto, María Jesús & Rodríguez, Alicia, 2021. "Failed and successful innovations: The role of geographic proximity and international diversity of partners in technological collaboration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    12. Ying-Yu Chen & Yi-Long Jaw, 2014. "How do business groups’ small world networks effect diversification, innovation, and internationalization?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1019-1044, December.
    13. Martínez-Noya, Andrea & García-Canal, Esteban, 2021. "Innovation performance feedback and technological alliance portfolio diversity: The moderating role of firms’ R&D intensity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    14. Davide Antonioli & Alberto Marzucchi & Maria Savona, 2017. "Pain shared, pain halved? Cooperation as a coping strategy for innovation barriers," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 841-864, August.
    15. Maria Grazia Zoia & Laura Barbieri & Flavia Cortelezzi & Giovanni Marseguerra, 2018. "The determinants of Italian firms’ technological competencies and capabilities," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(4), pages 453-476, December.
    16. René Belderbos & Martin Carree & Boris Lokshin & Juan Fernández Sastre, 2015. "Inter-temporal patterns of R&D collaboration and innovative performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 123-137, February.
    17. Anne Paalanen & Vesa Harmaakorpi & Timo Pihkala, 2006. "Absorptive Capacity in Practice-Based Innovation Activities: the Case of Lahti Region, Finland," ERSA conference papers ersa06p347, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Telg, Nina & Lokshin, Boris & Letterie, Wilko, 2023. "How formal and informal intellectual property protection matters for firms' decision to engage in coopetition: The role of environmental dynamism and competition intensity," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    19. Joan Crespo & Frédéric Amblard & Jérôme Vicente, 2015. "Simulating micro behaviours and structural properties of knowledge networks: toward a “one size fits one” cluster policy," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1503, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Feb 2015.
    20. Owusu Sarpong & Peter Teirlinck, 2018. "The influence of functional and geographical diversity in collaboration on product innovation performance in SMEs," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(6), pages 1667-1695, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:915-927.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.