IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v33y2020i1p155-211..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Idiosyncratic Jump Risk Matters: Evidence from Equity Returns and Options

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-François Bégin
  • Christian Dorion
  • Geneviève Gauthier

Abstract

The recent literature provides conflicting empirical evidence about the pricing of idiosyncratic risk. This paper sheds new light on the matter by exploiting the richness of option data. First, we find that idiosyncratic risk explains 28% of the variation in the risk premium on a stock. Second, we show that the contribution of idiosyncratic risk to the equity premium arises exclusively from jump risk. Third, we document that the commonality in idiosyncratic tail risk is much stronger than that in total idiosyncratic risk documented in the literature. Tail risk thus plays a central role in the pricing of idiosyncratic risk.Received May 15, 2017; editorial decision September 12, 2018 by Editor Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh. Authors have furnished code and an Internet Appendix, which are available on the Oxford University PressWeb site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-François Bégin & Christian Dorion & Geneviève Gauthier, 2020. "Idiosyncratic Jump Risk Matters: Evidence from Equity Returns and Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(1), pages 155-211.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:33:y:2020:i:1:p:155-211.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhz043
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aysan, Ahmet Faruk & Caporin, Massimiliano & Cepni, Oguzhan, 2024. "Not all words are equal: Sentiment and jumps in the cryptocurrency market," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Neuhierl, Andreas & Tang, Xiaoxiao & Varneskov, Rasmus Tangsgaard & Zhou, Guofu, 2022. "Option characteristics as cross-sectional predictors," LawFin Working Paper Series 37, Goethe University, Center for Advanced Studies on the Foundations of Law and Finance (LawFin).
    3. Escobar-Anel, Marcos & Rastegari, Javad & Stentoft, Lars, 2023. "Covariance dependent kernels, a Q-affine GARCH for multi-asset option pricing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Xingchun Wang, 2021. "Pricing vulnerable options with jump risk and liquidity risk," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 243-260, October.
    5. Johannes Hendrik Venter & Pieter Juriaan De Jongh, 2022. "Trading Binary Options Using Expected Profit and Loss Metrics," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Fan, Zhenzhen & Londono, Juan M. & Xiao, Xiao, 2022. "Equity tail risk and currency risk premiums," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 484-503.
    7. Gurdal Ertek & Aysha Al-Kaabi & Aktham Issa Maghyereh, 2022. "Analytical Modeling and Empirical Analysis of Binary Options Strategies," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
    8. Song, Shiyu & Tang, Dan & Xu, Guangli & Yin, Xunbai, 2023. "An analytical GARCH valuation model for spread options with default risk," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-20.
    9. Chen, Xi & Wang, Junbo & Wu, Chunchi & Wu, Di, 2024. "Extreme illiquidity and cross-sectional corporate bond returns," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Augustyniak, Maciej & Badescu, Alexandru & Bégin, Jean-François, 2023. "A discrete-time hedging framework with multiple factors and fat tails: On what matters," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 416-444.
    11. Badescu, Alexandru & Quaye, Enoch & Tunaru, Radu, 2022. "On non-negative equity guarantee calculations with macroeconomic variables related to house prices," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 119-138.
    12. Xingchun Wang & Han Zhang, 2024. "Pricing Fade-in Options Under GARCH-Jump Processes," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(4), pages 2563-2584, October.
    13. Escobar-Anel, Marcos & Rastegari, Javad & Stentoft, Lars, 2020. "Affine multivariate GARCH models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    14. Rombouts, Jeroen V.K. & Stentoft, Lars & Violante, Francesco, 2020. "Pricing individual stock options using both stock and market index information," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    15. Pollastri, Alessandro & Rodrigues, Paulo & Schlag, Christian & Seeger, Norman J., 2023. "A jumping index of jumping stocks? An MCMC analysis of continuous-time models for individual stocks," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 322-341.
    16. Deniz Erdemlioglu & Christopher J. Neely & Xiye Yang, 2023. "Systemic Tail Risk: High-Frequency Measurement, Evidence and Implications," Working Papers 2023-016, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    17. Zhe Li, 2020. "Equity Option Pricing with Systematic and Idiosyncratic Volatility and Jump Risks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Mathieu Fournier & Kris Jacobs & Piotr Orłowski, 2024. "Modeling Conditional Factor Risk Premia Implied by Index Option Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(3), pages 2289-2338, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:33:y:2020:i:1:p:155-211.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.