IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v38y2008i1p81-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges to Federalism: Homeland Security and Disaster Response

Author

Listed:
  • Carmine Scavo
  • Richard C. Kearney
  • Richard J. Kilroy

Abstract

This article examines the state of federalism in the Bush Administration from the perspective of the policy area of homeland security and disaster response. The article uses the International City and County Management Association homeland security survey completed in the spring and summer of 2005 as a source of data. The article argues that while it is tempting to look for one single agency to control homeland security and disaster response, a networked model is better supported by the survey data and by recent experience in terrorist and natural disaster response. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmine Scavo & Richard C. Kearney & Richard J. Kilroy, 2008. "Challenges to Federalism: Homeland Security and Disaster Response," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 38(1), pages 81-110, Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:38:y:2008:i:1:p:81-110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjm029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hildebrand Sean, 2015. "Coerced Confusion? Local Emergency Policy Implementation After September 11," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 273-298, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:38:y:2008:i:1:p:81-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.