IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/polsoc/v42y2023i1p104-116..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political legitimacy and vaccine hesitancy: Disability support workers in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Dickinson
  • Anne Kavanagh
  • Stefanie Dimov
  • Marissa Shields
  • Ashley McAllister

Abstract

People with disability are an at-risk group in the COVID-19 pandemic for a range of clinical and socioeconomic reasons. In recognition of this, Australians with disability and those who work with them were prioritized in access to vaccination, but the vaccination targets were not met. In this paper, we analyze qualitative data generated from a survey with 368 disability support workers to identify drivers of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and why the implementation of this policy may have experienced challenges. We identify a range of themes within these data but ultimately argue that a major driver of vaccine hesitancy in this group is a mistrust of government and an erosion of employment terms and conditions. Drawing on the policy capacity literature, we argue that the “Achilles’ heel” for the Australian government in this case is the critical policy capacity of political legitimacy. This finding has important implications for where the government needs to increase/build policy capacity, strengthening its efforts and better relating to organizations that can be helpful in terms of developing public health messaging for disability support workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Dickinson & Anne Kavanagh & Stefanie Dimov & Marissa Shields & Ashley McAllister, 2023. "Political legitimacy and vaccine hesitancy: Disability support workers in Australia," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(1), pages 104-116.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:42:y:2023:i:1:p:104-116.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/polsoc/puac030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Howlett & M. Ramesh, 2016. "Achilles' heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(4), pages 301-313, December.
    2. Marleen Easton & Jasper Paepe & Phoebe Evans & Brian W.Head & Jennifer Yarnold, 2022. "Embedding Expertise for Policy Responses to COVID-19: Comparing Decision-Making Structures in Two Federal Democracies," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 309-326, June.
    3. Yaqub, Ohid & Castle-Clarke, Sophie & Sevdalis, Nick & Chataway, Joanna, 2014. "Attitudes to vaccination: A critical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Hill, Patrick L. & Burrow, Anthony L. & Strecher, Victor J., 2021. "Sense of purpose in life predicts greater willingness for COVID-19 vaccination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    5. Freimuth, Vicki S. & Jamison, Amelia M. & An, Ji & Hancock, Gregory R. & Quinn, Sandra Crouse, 2017. "Determinants of trust in the flu vaccine for African Americans and Whites," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 70-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabiana da Cunha Saddi & Stephen Peckham & Gerald Bloom & Nick Turnbull & Vera Schattan Coelho & Jean-Louis Denis, 2023. "Employing the policy capacity framework for health system strengthening," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(1), pages 1-13.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jamison, Amelia M. & Quinn, Sandra Crouse & Freimuth, Vicki S., 2019. "“You don't trust a government vaccine”: Narratives of institutional trust and influenza vaccination among African American and white adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 87-94.
    2. Lahijani, Ariana Y. & King, Adrian R. & Gullatte, Mary M. & Hennink, Monique & Bednarczyk, Robert A., 2021. "HPV Vaccine Promotion: The church as an agent of change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    3. John Iceland & Eric Silver & Kerby Goff, 2023. "Moral intuitions and vaccine hesitancy during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(3), pages 230-247, May.
    4. Philipp Wassler & Giacomo Del Chiappa & Thi Hong Hai Nguyen & Giancarlo Fedeli & Nigel L. Williams, 2022. "Increasing vaccination intention in pandemic times: a social marketing perspective," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(1), pages 37-58, March.
    5. Joana Mendonça & Ana Patrícia Hilário, 2023. "Healthism vis-à-vis Vaccine Hesitancy: Insights from Parents Who Either Delay or Refuse Children’s Vaccination in Portugal," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. repec:beo:swcetp:23-03 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Theiss Bendixen, 2020. "How cultural evolution can inform the science of science communication—and vice versa," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Hao Gao & Qingting Zhao & Chuanlin Ning & Difan Guo & Jing Wu & Lina Li, 2021. "Does the COVID-19 Vaccine Still Work That “Most of the Confirmed Cases Had Been Vaccinated”? A Content Analysis of Vaccine Effectiveness Discussion on Sina Weibo during the Outbreak of COVID-19 in Nan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Nong, Paige & Raj, Minakshi & Trinidad, Marie Grace & Rowe, Zachary & Platt, Jodyn, 2021. "Understanding racial differences in attitudes about public health efforts during COVID-19 using an explanatory mixed methods design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    10. Isobel Routledge & Saki Takahashi & Adrienne Epstein & Jill Hakim & Owen Janson & Keirstinne Turcios & Jo Vinden & John Tomas Risos & Margaret Rose Baniqued & Lori Pham & Clara Di Germanio & Michael B, 2022. "Using sero-epidemiology to monitor disparities in vaccination and infection with SARS-CoV-2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    11. Vincenzo Carrieri & Raffele Lagravinese & Giuliano Resce, 2021. "Predicting vaccine hesitancy from area‐level indicators: A machine learning approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 3248-3256, December.
    12. Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Hans Philipp Hofmann, 2021. "An Old Plug and a New Virus: Effect of Public Corruption on the Covid-19 Immunization Progress," CESifo Working Paper Series 9307, CESifo.
    13. Kiana Wilkins, 2022. "Intersectional Immunity? Examining How Race/Ethnicity and Sexual Orientation Combine to Shape Influenza Vaccination Among US Adults," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(6), pages 2585-2612, December.
    14. Jessica Weinkle, 2022. "An evaluation of North Carolina science advice on COVID-19 pandemic response," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Hill, Patrick L. & Burrow, Anthony L. & Strecher, Victor J., 2021. "Sense of purpose in life predicts greater willingness for COVID-19 vaccination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    16. Liliana Veronica Diaconescu & Iuliana Raluca Gheorghe & Tamara Cheşcheş & Ovidiu Popa-Velea, 2021. "Psychological Variables Associated with HPV Vaccination Intent in Romanian Academic Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Ward, Jeremy K., 2016. "Rethinking the antivaccine movement concept: A case study of public criticism of the swine flu vaccine’s safety in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 48-57.
    18. Schober, Thomas, 2020. "Effects of a measles outbreak on vaccination uptake," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    19. Herzig van Wees, Sibylle & Ström, Maria, 2024. "“Your child will have a bird brain!”: Vaccination choices and stigma among vaccine enquirers in Sweden: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    20. Yaqub, Ohid, 2017. "Testing regimes in clinical trials: Evidence from four polio vaccine trajectories," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 475-484.
    21. Fabiana da Cunha Saddi & Stephen Peckham & Gerald Bloom & Nick Turnbull & Vera Schattan Coelho & Jean-Louis Denis, 2023. "Employing the policy capacity framework for health system strengthening," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(1), pages 1-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:42:y:2023:i:1:p:104-116.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.