IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jecgeo/v19y2019i6p1211-1232..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Openness values and regional innovation: a set-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Roel Rutten

Abstract

Statistical studies evidence that openness values matter for regional innovation but not how they matter. A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) study of 108 North–West European regions identifies four cross-case mechanisms that explain regional innovation: the diversity, cosmopolitan environment, technology transfer and creativity mechanisms. Only in technology transfer do openness values not play a role. This evidences that openness values connect diverse local and non-local social spaces to local and non-local physical places to unlock a larger potential for more dynamic innovation. QCA understands causality as configurational and identifies mechanisms rather than net effects, which answers how-questions better than statistical methods do. The focus on mechanisms highlights how innovation connects interactions between agents in social space to physical place, which makes an empirical contribution to the relational economic geography literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Roel Rutten, 2019. "Openness values and regional innovation: a set-analysis," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(6), pages 1211-1232.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:19:y:2019:i:6:p:1211-1232.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeg/lby061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yunyao Li & Yanji Ma, 2022. "Research on Industrial Innovation Efficiency and the Influencing Factors of the Old Industrial Base Based on the Lock-In Effect, a Case Study of Jilin Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Obschonka, Martin & Tavassoli, Sam & Rentfrow, P. Jason & Potter, Jeff & Gosling, Samuel D., 2023. "Innovation and inter-city knowledge spillovers: Social, geographical, and technological connectedness and psychological openness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    3. Mirella Schrijvers & Erik Stam & Niels Bosma, 2024. "Figuring it out: configurations of high-performing entrepreneurial ecosystems in Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(5), pages 1096-1110, May.
    4. Age Mariussen & Fatime Barbara Hegyi, 2020. "Creating Growth by Connecting Place-Based Development Strategies," JRC Research Reports JRC122247, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Lagendijk Arnoud & Velde Martin van der & Kuijpers Mark, 2020. "Looking for causes of effects in cases: Evaluating intermunicipal collaboration in The Netherlands applying QCA," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 64(3), pages 149-164, November.
    6. Grillitsch, Markus & Sotarauta, Markku & Asheim, Björn & Fitjar, Rune Dahl & Haus-Reve, Silje & Kolehmainen, Jari & Kurikka, Heli & Lundquist, Karl-Johan & Martynovich, Mikhail & Monteilhet, Skirmante, 2022. "Agency and Economic Change in Regions: Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to identify Routes to New Path Development," Papers in Innovation Studies 2022/5, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    7. Filippopoulos, Nikolaos & Fotopoulos, Georgios, 2022. "Innovation in economically developed and lagging European regions: A configurational analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    8. Tatjana Bennat, 2022. "High Innovativeness of SMEs and the Configuration of Learning-by-Doing, Learning-by-Using, Learning-by-Interacting, and Learning-by-Science: a Regional Comparison Applying Fuzzy Qualitative Comparativ," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1666-1691, June.
    9. Lagendijk Arnoud & Velde Martin van der & Kuijpers Mark, 2020. "Looking for causes of effects in cases: Evaluating intermunicipal collaboration in The Netherlands applying QCA," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, De Gruyter, vol. 64(3), pages 149-164, November.
    10. Rutten Roel, 2020. "Comparing causal logics: A configurational analysis of proximities using simulated data," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 64(3), pages 134-148, November.
    11. Benz Lena & Block Jörn H. & Johann Matthias S., 2024. "Hidden champions as a determinant of regional development: An analysis of german districts," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 68(1), pages 9-39.
    12. Yang, Rui & Che, Tong & Lai, Fujun, 2021. "The Impacts of production linkages on cross-regional collaborative innovations: The role of inter-regional network capital✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regional innovation; openness values; economic diversity; socio-cultural diversity; QCA; relational economic geography;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:19:y:2019:i:6:p:1211-1232.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/joeg .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.