IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v47y2020i2p215-236..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Birds of a Feather Feel Together: Emotional Ability Similarity in Consumer Interactions
[If Looks Could Sell: Moderation and Mediation of the Attractiveness Effect on Salesperson Performance]

Author

Listed:
  • Blair Kidwell
  • Virginie Lopez-Kidwell
  • Christopher Blocker
  • Erick M Mas
  • Eileen Fischer
  • Margaret C Campbell
  • Andrea C Morales

Abstract

The authors introduce emotional ability similarity to explain consumer satisfaction in interactions with frontline sales and service employees and other consumers beyond the effects of traditional relational variables in the similarity–attraction paradigm. Four studies examine how and why similar abilities for using emotional information between two people promote relational success in marketplace exchanges. We find that, when interacting with others, consumers who exchange nonverbal information with their partners experience (dis)similarity in their emotional ability (EA). Similar dyads who rely on expressive (high–high EA pairs) or inexpressive (low–low EA pairs) emotion norms experience significantly greater satisfaction in their interactions than consumers with dissimilar norms (high–low EA pairs). Together, these findings advance the understanding of consumer relationships and satisfaction by establishing EA similarity as a new avenue for consumer research.

Suggested Citation

  • Blair Kidwell & Virginie Lopez-Kidwell & Christopher Blocker & Erick M Mas & Eileen Fischer & Margaret C Campbell & Andrea C Morales, 2020. "Birds of a Feather Feel Together: Emotional Ability Similarity in Consumer Interactions [If Looks Could Sell: Moderation and Mediation of the Attractiveness Effect on Salesperson Performance]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 47(2), pages 215-236.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:47:y:2020:i:2:p:215-236.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucaa011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:47:y:2020:i:2:p:215-236.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.