IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v46y2020i6p1052-1075..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

People Rely Less on Consumer Reviews for Experiential than Material Purchases
[The Role of (Dis)Similarity in (Mis)Predicting Others’ Preferences]

Author

Listed:
  • Hengchen Dai
  • Cindy Chan
  • Cassie Mogilner
  • Darren W. Dahl
  • Margaret C. Campbell
  • Cait Lamberton

Abstract

An increasingly prevalent form of social influence occurs online where consumers read reviews written by other consumers. Do people rely on consumer reviews differently when making experiential purchases (events to live through) versus when making material purchases (objects to keep)? Though people often use consumer reviews both when making experiential and material purchases, an analysis of more than six million reviews on Amazon.com and four laboratory experiments reveal that people are less likely to rely on consumer reviews for experiential purchases than for material purchases. This effect is driven by beliefs that reviews are less reflective of the purchase’s objective quality for experiences than for material goods. These findings not only indicate how different types of purchases are influenced by word of mouth, but also illuminate the psychological processes underlying shoppers’ reliance on consumer reviews. Furthermore, as one of the first investigations into how people choose among various experiential and material purchase options, these findings suggest that people are less receptive to being told what to do than what to have.

Suggested Citation

  • Hengchen Dai & Cindy Chan & Cassie Mogilner & Darren W. Dahl & Margaret C. Campbell & Cait Lamberton, 2020. "People Rely Less on Consumer Reviews for Experiential than Material Purchases [The Role of (Dis)Similarity in (Mis)Predicting Others’ Preferences]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(6), pages 1052-1075.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:46:y:2020:i:6:p:1052-1075.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucz042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziwei Cong & Jia Liu & Puneet Manchanda, 2021. "The Role of "Live" in Livestreaming Markets: Evidence Using Orthogonal Random Forest," Papers 2107.01629, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    2. Qiulian Shen & Yuxuan Du & Jingxian Huang, 2024. "Consumer Citizenship Behavior in Online/Offline Shopping Contexts: Differential Impact of Consumer Perceived Value and Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Jonah Berger & Matthew D Rocklage & Grant Packard, 2022. "Expression Modalities: How Speaking Versus Writing Shapes Word of Mouth [Affective and Semantic Components in Political Person Perception]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(3), pages 389-408.
    4. Iñigo Gallo & Chadwick J Miller & Nasir Haghighi & Thomas D. Gilovich, 2024. "The differential impact of uncertainty on the evaluation of material and experiential purchases," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 187-203, June.
    5. Moradi, Masoud & Dass, Mayukh & Kumar, Piyush, 2023. "Differential effects of analytical versus emotional rhetorical style on review helpfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Jonah Berger & Grant Packard & Reihane Boghrati & Ming Hsu & Ashlee Humphreys & Andrea Luangrath & Sarah Moore & Gideon Nave & Christopher Olivola & Matthew Rocklage, 2022. "Marketing insights from text analysis," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 365-377, September.
    7. Liu, Mengmeng & Morrin, Maureen & Chae, Boyoun Grace, 2022. "Stop arguing! How childhood exposure to interparental conflict affects consumer response toward product review dispersion," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1093-1107.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:46:y:2020:i:6:p:1052-1075.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.