IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v46y2019i1p180-199..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deception Memory: When Will Consumers Remember Their Lies?

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Cowley
  • Christina I Anthony
  • Darren W DahlEditor
  • Amna KirmaniEditor
  • Peter R DarkeAssociate Editor

Abstract

Consumers tell many lies. While engaging in deception can provide a variety of benefits, a potential danger when lying is that the consumer may subsequently forget aspects of the lie told. To ensure the deception is not inadvertently revealed later, the consumer must remember the content of the lie. In this research, we introduce the notion of deception memory—which we define as memory for the content of a previously communicated lie—and examine what differentiates a memorable lie from a forgettable lie. Three behavioral studies where consumers lie to marketers (study 1) or fellow consumers (studies 2 and 3) and a critical incident study (study 4) show that increases in the consequentiality of the lie heightens lie-induced arousal (LIA), which narrows attention to the content of the lie and subsequently improves deception memory. Therefore, while more arousing lies may be more consequential, and therefore, riskier to tell, our results suggest that they are less likely to be forgotten. This is the first examination of retrieval accuracy for deception memory. Finally, many avenues for future research related to memorable and forgettable lies are proposed in this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Cowley & Christina I Anthony & Darren W DahlEditor & Amna KirmaniEditor & Peter R DarkeAssociate Editor, 2019. "Deception Memory: When Will Consumers Remember Their Lies?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(1), pages 180-199.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:46:y:2019:i:1:p:180-199.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucy066
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ringler, Christine, 2021. "Truth and lies: The impact of modality on customer feedback," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 376-387.
    2. Snyder, Hannah & Witell, Lars & Gustafsson, Anders & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2022. "Consumer lying behavior in service encounters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 755-769.
    3. Guang-Xin Xie & Hua Chang & Tracy Rank-Christman, 2022. "Contesting Dishonesty: When and Why Perspective-Taking Decreases Ethical Tolerance of Marketplace Deception," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 117-133, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:46:y:2019:i:1:p:180-199.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.