IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v37y2010i3p473-489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluative Conditioning Procedures and the Resilience of Conditioned Brand Attitudes

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Sweldens
  • Stijn M. J. Van Osselaer
  • Chris Janiszewski

Abstract

Changing brand attitudes by pairing a brand with affectively laden stimuli such as celebrity endorsers or pleasant pictures is called evaluative conditioning. We show that this attitude change can occur in two ways, depending on how brands and affective stimuli are presented. Attitude change can result from establishing a memory link between brand and affective stimulus (indirect attitude change) or from direct "affect transfer" from affective stimulus to brand (direct attitude change). Direct attitude change is significantly more robust than indirect attitude change, for example, to changes in the valence of affective stimuli (unconditioned stimulus revaluation: e.g., endorsers falling from grace), to interference by subsequent information (e.g., advertising clutter), and to persuasion knowledge activation (e.g., consumer suspicion about being influenced). Indirect evaluative conditioning requires repeated presentations of a brand with the same affective stimulus. Direct evaluative conditioning requires simultaneous presentation of a brand with different affective stimuli. (c) 2010 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Sweldens & Stijn M. J. Van Osselaer & Chris Janiszewski, 2010. "Evaluative Conditioning Procedures and the Resilience of Conditioned Brand Attitudes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(3), pages 473-489, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:37:y:2010:i:3:p:473-489
    DOI: 10.1086/653656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/653656
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/653656?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne-Madeleine Kranzbühler & Mirella H. P. Kleijnen & Peeter W. J. Verlegh, 2019. "Outsourcing the pain, keeping the pleasure: effects of outsourced touchpoints in the customer journey," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 308-327, March.
    2. Galina Biedenbach & Thomas Biedenbach & Peter Hultén & Veronika Tarnovskaya, 2022. "Organizational resilience and internal branding: investigating the effects triggered by self-service technology," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 420-433, July.
    3. Geoffrey Fisher & Matthew McGranaghan & Jura Liaukonyte & Kenneth C. Wilbur, 2023. "Price promotions, beneficiary framing, and mental accounting," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 147-181, June.
    4. Paul Biegler, 2014. "Placebogenic Potential is no Reason to Favour Pharmaceutical Advertising," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 145-155, August.
    5. Nathalie Spielmann & Pierrick Gomez & Elizabeth Minton, 2024. "The Role of the Ugly = Bad Stereotype in the Rejection of Misshapen Produce," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 413-437, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:37:y:2010:i:3:p:473-489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.