IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v12y2017i1p54-65..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic and economic evaluation of a small-scale organic Rankine cycle integrated with a concentrating solar collector

Author

Listed:
  • Milad Ashouri
  • Fatemeh Razi Astaraei
  • Roghaye Ghasempour
  • M.H. Ahmadi
  • Michel Feidt

Abstract

Recently, distributed power systems especially with renewable sources have shown an increasing demand all over the world and have been a technical viable solution to demand growth for electricity. Among these, solar-thermal power plants show a trustworthy source for electricity generation especially for rural areas where small-scale plants are needed. Organic Rankine cycle (ORC) is a suitable power cycle for electricity generation from low-grade heat and has shown a good compatibility with parabolic trough solar collectors (PTCs). In this study, a PTC integrated with an ORC is being studied thermodynamically and economically for small-scale electricity generation up to 100 kW electricity. Four schematics of the cycle including the recuperation and superheating are examined. Effect of superheating and recuperating was investigated on the thermal efficiency and costs of the system. A parametric study shows the effect of key parameters such as turbine inlet temperature and pressure on the characteristics of the system such as net work, thermal efficiency, oil temperature, overall heat transfer coefficient and heat transfer area of shell-and-tube heat exchangers and also on costs of the system. Results show the dependence of the system efficiency and system costs on the operating pressure of heat exchangers. Existence of the Recuperator seems quite effective on increasing the cycle efficiency and, in some cases, lowering the total costs due to lowering the condenser load. A comparison of different working fluids including benzene, butane, pentane, isopentane, R123 and R245fa have been done to cover a wide range of operating pressures and temperatures. Results show that benzene has the best thermodynamic performance among other fluids followed by pentane, isopentane, R123, R245fa and butane. Also, benzene has the highest total cost among other fluids followed by pentane, isopentane, butane, R123 and R245fa. This paper helps to evaluate a solar ORC power plant both thermodynamically and economically.

Suggested Citation

  • Milad Ashouri & Fatemeh Razi Astaraei & Roghaye Ghasempour & M.H. Ahmadi & Michel Feidt, 2017. "Thermodynamic and economic evaluation of a small-scale organic Rankine cycle integrated with a concentrating solar collector," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 54-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:12:y:2017:i:1:p:54-65.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctv025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Ashouri, Milad & Mohammadi, Amin, 2017. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a regenerative two-stage organic Rankine cycle coupled with liquefied natural gas and solar energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 899-914.
    2. Ali Komeili Birjandi & Morteza Fahim Alavi & Mohamed Salem & Mamdouh El Haj Assad & Natarajan Prabaharan, 2022. "Modeling carbon dioxide emission of countries in southeast of Asia by applying artificial neural network [Energy and exergy analyses of single flash geothermal power plant at optimum separator temp," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 17, pages 321-326.
    3. Man-Hoe Kim, 2022. "Energy and Exergy Analysis of Solar Organic Rankine Cycle Coupled with Vapor Compression Refrigeration Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:12:y:2017:i:1:p:54-65.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.