IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v71y2016i2p220-229..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age Differences in the Differentiation of Trait Impressions From Faces

Author

Listed:
  • Stacey Y. Ng
  • Leslie A. Zebrowitz
  • Robert G. Franklin

Abstract

Objectives. We investigated whether evidence that older adults (OA) show less differentiation of visual stimuli than younger adults (YA) extends to trait impressions from faces and effects of face age. We also examined whether age differences in mood, vision, or cognition-mediated differentiation differences. Finally, we investigated whether age differences in trait differentiation mediated differences in impression positivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Stacey Y. Ng & Leslie A. Zebrowitz & Robert G. Franklin, 2016. "Age Differences in the Differentiation of Trait Impressions From Faces," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(2), pages 220-229.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:71:y:2016:i:2:p:220-229.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbu113
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer L. Kellough & Bob G. Knight, 2012. "Positivity Effects in Older Adults' Perception of Facial Emotion: The Role of Future Time Perspective," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 67(2), pages 150-158.
    2. Ted Ruffman & Susan Sullivan & Nigel Edge, 2006. "Differences in the Way Older and Younger Adults Rate Threat in Faces But Not Situations," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 61(4), pages 187-194.
    3. Ted Ruffman & Jamin Halberstadt & Janice Murray, 2009. "Recognition of Facial, Auditory, and Bodily Emotions in Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(6), pages 696-703.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah A. Grainger & Julie D. Henry & Louise H. Phillips & Eric J. Vanman & Roy Allen, 2017. "Age Deficits in Facial Affect Recognition: The Influence of Dynamic Cues," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(4), pages 622-632.
    2. Eric D. Leshikar & Jung M. Park & Angela H. Gutchess, 2015. "Similarity to the Self Affects Memory for Impressions of Others in Younger and Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(5), pages 737-742.
    3. Jonathan J. Rolison & Yaniv Hanoch & Stacey Wood & Pi-Ju Liu, 2014. "Risk-Taking Differences Across the Adult Life Span: A Question of Age and Domain," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 69(6), pages 870-880.
    4. Christine Juang & Bob G. Knight, 2016. "Age Differences in Interpreting Ambiguous Situations: The Effects of Content Themes and Depressed Mood," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(6), pages 1024-1033.
    5. Chao Chen & Ye Xu & Yi Sun & Xin Zhang, 2022. "Age differences in facial trustworthiness perception are diminished by affective processing," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 413-422, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:71:y:2016:i:2:p:220-229.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.