IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v70y2015i5p737-742..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similarity to the Self Affects Memory for Impressions of Others in Younger and Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Eric D. Leshikar
  • Jung M. Park
  • Angela H. Gutchess

Abstract

Objectives. Similarity to the self has been shown to affect memory for impressions in younger adults, suggesting a self-reference effect in person memory. Because older adults show comparable self-reference effects, but prioritize memory for positive over negative information relative to young adults, we examined age differences in self-similarity effects on memory for positive and negative impressions.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric D. Leshikar & Jung M. Park & Angela H. Gutchess, 2015. "Similarity to the Self Affects Memory for Impressions of Others in Younger and Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(5), pages 737-742.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:70:y:2015:i:5:p:737-742.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbt132
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer L. Kellough & Bob G. Knight, 2012. "Positivity Effects in Older Adults' Perception of Facial Emotion: The Role of Future Time Perspective," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 67(2), pages 150-158.
    2. Susanne Scheibe & Laura L. Carstensen, 2010. "Emotional Aging: Recent Findings and Future Trends," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 65(2), pages 135-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Atsunobu Suzuki, 2018. "Persistent Reliance on Facial Appearance Among Older Adults When Judging Someone’s Trustworthiness," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(4), pages 573-583.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth A. Kensinger & Angela H. Gutchess, 2017. "Cognitive Aging in a Social and Affective Context: Advances Over the Past 50 Years," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(1), pages 61-70.
    2. Kathryn Hale & Truls Østbye & Bilesha Perera & Robert Bradley & Joanna Maselko, 2019. "A Novel Adaptation of the HOME Inventory for Elders: The Importance of the Home Environment Across the Life Course," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Carla Estrada-Muñoz & Dante Castillo & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Joan Boada-Grau, 2020. "Teacher Technostress in the Chilean School System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Kimberly McAdams & Richard Lucas & M. Donnellan, 2012. "The Role of Domain Satisfaction in Explaining the Paradoxical Association Between Life Satisfaction and Age," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 109(2), pages 295-303, November.
    5. Stacey Y. Ng & Leslie A. Zebrowitz & Robert G. Franklin, 2016. "Age Differences in the Differentiation of Trait Impressions From Faces," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(2), pages 220-229.
    6. Jonathan J. Rolison & Yaniv Hanoch & Stacey Wood & Pi-Ju Liu, 2014. "Risk-Taking Differences Across the Adult Life Span: A Question of Age and Domain," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 69(6), pages 870-880.
    7. Junji Kageyama & Kazuma Sato, 2021. "Explaining the U-shaped life satisfaction: dissatisfaction as a driver of behavior," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 179-202, July.
    8. Anna Schlomann & Mareike Bünning & Lena Hipp & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2022. "Aging during COVID-19 in Germany: a longitudinal analysis of psychosocial adaptation," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1077-1086, December.
    9. Cara A. Palmer & Amy L. Gentzler, 2019. "Age-Related Differences in Savoring Across Adulthood: The Role of Emotional Goals and Future Time Perspective," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1281-1304, April.
    10. Christine Juang & Bob G. Knight, 2016. "Age Differences in Interpreting Ambiguous Situations: The Effects of Content Themes and Depressed Mood," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(6), pages 1024-1033.
    11. Neda Nasrollahi & Tim Jowett & Liana Machado, 2022. "Emotional information processing in young and older adults: meta-analysis reveals faces elicit distinct biases," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 369-379, September.
    12. Nathalie Hauk & Anja S Göritz & Stefan Krumm, 2019. "The mediating role of coping behavior on the age-technostress relationship: A longitudinal multilevel mediation model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Ottar Hellevik, 2017. "The U-shaped age–happiness relationship: real or methodological artifact?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 177-197, January.
    14. Schlomann, Anna & Bünning, Mareike & Hipp, Lena & Wahl, Hans-Werner, 2021. "Aging during COVID-19 in Germany: a longitudinal analysis of psychosocial adaptation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Online Fi, pages 1-1.
    15. R Asaad Baksh & Sharon Abrahams & Bonnie Auyeung & Sarah E MacPherson, 2018. "The Edinburgh Social Cognition Test (ESCoT): Examining the effects of age on a new measure of theory of mind and social norm understanding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Lourdes Rey & Natalio Extremera & Nicolás Sánchez-Álvarez, 2019. "Clarifying The Links Between Perceived Emotional Intelligence and Well-Being in Older People: Pathways Through Perceived Social Support from Family and Friends," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 221-235, March.
    17. Susan D Shenkin & Roger Watson & Ken Laidlaw & John M Starr & Ian J Deary, 2014. "The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire: Mokken Scaling Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.
    18. Arthur A. Stone & Stefan Schneider & Alan Krueger & Joseph E. Schwartz & Angus Deaton, 2018. "Experiential Wellbeing Data from the American Time Use Survey: Comparisons with Other Methods and Analytic Illustrations with Age and Income," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 359-378, February.
    19. Duberstein, Paul R. & Hoerger, Michael & Norton, Sally A. & Mohile, Supriya & Dahlberg, Britt & Hyatt, Erica Goldblatt & Epstein, Ronald M. & Wittink, Marsha N., 2023. "The TRIBE model: How socioemotional processes fuel end-of-life treatment in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:70:y:2015:i:5:p:737-742.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.